View Poll Results: What do you think will power the Z/28? ( | |||
Small (5 - 5.5L range) high revving engine | 26 | 8.10% | |
LT1 with minor power bump (CAI, exhaust, etc) | 10 | 3.12% | |
Heavily reworked LT1, similar to the LS6 from the C5 Z06; ~500 hp | 65 | 20.25% | |
Large displacement sucessor to the LS7, ~550 hp | 129 | 40.19% | |
LT4, same as from the ZL1, CTS-v, and Z06 | 50 | 15.58% | |
'super LT4' with a bigger blower or turbos making 700+ | 31 | 9.66% | |
Other (please specify) | 10 | 3.12% | |
Voters: 321. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply
|
|
Thread Tools |
05-22-2016, 04:39 PM | #43 | |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,428
|
Quote:
The main advantage I see is the new platform for the 6thGen. There probably isn't as much room now to differentiate between a ZL-1 and the Z/28 as there was with the 5thGen....The weight loss, suspension, brakes, etc., etc., of the 5thGen really set the Z/28 apart from the others. I see nothing wrong with using all the hp the LT4 can provide and bump up the suspension and track-worthiness, etc., etc., in a Z/28 that would make it a stand alone track car. It would validate the proof that heat-soak, complexity, etc., any other issues of S/C for the track have been eliminated... We can all cherry-pick the traditions, dna, heritage that suits an argument, but honestly that ship has sailed, and even with the 5thGen, it was way different than the original....It can still be a Z/28 if it is the best performing track car that Camaro can offer, even if it uses the same engine as the ZL-1. All Camaro models are a progressive improvement over the other. The Z/28 sales will be the least of all of them. An LT4 will fit in just fine... Could be all wrong....no worries regardless of what they put in it....Just my rambling thoughts...Peace... |
|
05-22-2016, 04:44 PM | #44 | |
Drives: SS 6 speed of course Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hilo, HI
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
__________________
Forged short block, large duration sub .600 lift Cam Motion cam, 7200 RPM fuel cut, Pray Ported Heads, 3.85 pulley D1X, stage II intercooler, DSX secondary low side, DSX E85 sensor, Lingenfelter big bore 2.0 pump, ported front cats, 60608 Borla, LT4 injectors, ZL1 1LE driveshaft and Katech ported TB, ported MSD intake, BTR valvetrain, ARP studs, ProFlow valves, PS4 tires.
|
|
05-22-2016, 04:46 PM | #45 | |
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
|
Quote:
I think GM will make it highly capable on the track regardless.
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod
|
|
05-22-2016, 05:10 PM | #46 | |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,428
|
Quote:
As far as cost, the Z/28 will still be the most expensive of all....if the LT4 can help keep it reasonable with it's "track competition" all the better....I just see a unique engine of some sorts in a Z/28 adding significantly to that cost... |
|
05-22-2016, 05:51 PM | #47 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
05-22-2016, 08:49 PM | #48 |
Moderator.ca
|
Alright, poll added. I tossed the flat plane crank idea in along with the small displacement engine.
I almost included a DOHC option as well, but then realized that there isn't anything that would prevent any of the 'new' engines from being DOHC on top of whatever else they might be. My personal opinion is that it will probably be an 'LT7' style engine. A new generation of large displacement NA small block glory. But I'm not even 50% confident that its going to go that way. If the car is actually a 'ZL1 ultra' instead of a Z/28, I could definitely see it coming with a new forced induction engine that makes a lot more power.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
05-22-2016, 09:12 PM | #49 |
Drives: the 2nd amendment home Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
|
I voted different just because you two pegged the needle on the LS7 option.
I know Al O. commented he'd like to play with the flat plane crank, so there's that. Cam/head/exhaust work on the LT1 might wake it up pretty well, I'm going with that and a nice N/A HP bump to the existing engine.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin |
05-22-2016, 09:14 PM | #50 |
Remember the Charleston 9
Drives: 2004 KME PREDATOR, 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summerv1LE SC
Posts: 5,381
|
I voted small displacement because a 302 would be badass but I would be thrilled with an LS7 replacement. An upgraded LT1 wouldn't be bad but I don't think it would necessarily be worthy of a Z/28. If they used that motor and it kept the price down I think people would grow to love it but an LT7 or a 302 would be an instant legend.
__________________
BRING BACK THE B4C POLICE CAMARO!
2002 V-6 5 speed rally red (current camaro) Also driven:1992 Z-28 305 auto Red w/ black stripes (anniversary), 2001 V-6 auto light pewter metallic,1991 RS V-6 auto Black |
05-22-2016, 09:32 PM | #51 |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
It probably will be 6.2 liters but I wouldn't expect it to be any smaller.
I'm hoping it's a large displacement V8 that revs to at least 7k rpm and makes 550 hp and 500 tq.
__________________
|
05-22-2016, 09:32 PM | #52 |
Drives: Slow Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 669
|
LT7, or maybe a slightly larger ci motor than the LT1 (6.4-6.6), but hopefully LT7
__________________
2016 Toyota 4Runner
2017 Camaro ZL1 |
05-23-2016, 08:39 AM | #53 | |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,024
|
Quote:
|
|
05-23-2016, 09:44 AM | #54 | |
Moderator.ca
|
Quote:
And weight plays a role in any type of acceleration: forward, backwards (ie, braking), and lateral. A more powerful engine doesn't do a whole lot to make a car turn better. So even if the ZL1 gets a better advantage in accelerating, it will be at a bigger disadvantage when slowing down or cornering. Plus there are other smaller factors, like weight distribution. The 6th gen is already fairly nose heavy, sticking a blower under the hood isn't going to help any. But if they can (somehow) front-bias the weight savings on the Z/28 it could have a dramatic affect on the relative handling of the two cars.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
05-23-2016, 10:04 AM | #55 | |
Drives: the 2nd amendment home Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
|
Quote:
Today, the ZL1 can scoot AND handle, but it's gonna be heavy. Depends on how much weight they can drop from the Z/28. It's gonna be tougher to find weight reduction this time around, I believe.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin |
|
05-23-2016, 11:09 AM | #56 | |
Moderator.ca
|
Quote:
A lot of the other stuff generally removed weight from the rear, which I think the team might want to avoid this time due to the existing front weight bias. They might look into do things like aluminum or maybe even carbon fibre front fenders instead of doing things like removing sound deadening and shaving the rear glass. Then again, it wouldn't make too much sense to setup tooling for just Z/28 front fenders when they could just as easily be used on a ZL1 as well. Point is, there are plenty of opportunities to cut weight on the Z/28. While doing the exact sames things as last time might not achieve the same weight loss ... I don't expect them to do the exact same things this time.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|