10-31-2018, 01:55 PM | #15 |
Drives: 2016 M6 2.0T Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 839
|
You may have bought the wrong car..
__________________
RS Package, HD Cooling Package, Brembo 6 Piston Front Brakes, SRP Racing Pedals, Soler Performance Throttle Controller, Dyno Tuned by Trifecta, Velossa Tech Ram Air, Mishimoto Intake, aFe Air Filter, Mishimoto Charge Pipes, ZZP 67mm Throttle Body, Trifecta T40 Stage 2 Turbo, JacFab Recirculation Valve, PTP Turbo Blanket, ZZP Catted Downpipe, Mishimoto Pro Cat-Back Quad Tip Exhaust, Mishimoto Catch Cans, Mishimoto Coolant Reservoir Tank, GM SEMA Grill, Ikon Motorsports Front Fascia Extension, Ikon Motorsports 1LE Spoiler, American Authority ZL1 Side Skirts, AMPP Quad Tip Rear Valance
|
10-31-2018, 02:06 PM | #16 |
Drives: '23 1SS Sharkskin A10 Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,055
|
Don't get me wrong, I love my car. For what I paid and the way it came packaged, I'm very happy. I like modding it and enjoy just looking at it. My other car is a 2016 Mini Cooper Countryman S, so I have nothing against turbos.
With that said, I've always wanted an SS but got a dose of reality when I saw the numbers. I plan on trading her in in a few years and getting into that SS.
__________________
Previously Owned:
2018 Silver Ice Metallic Camaro R/S 1992 Dark Teal Camaro R/S 305 V8 |
10-31-2018, 03:08 PM | #17 | |
Drives: 2016 M6 2.0T Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 839
|
Quote:
__________________
RS Package, HD Cooling Package, Brembo 6 Piston Front Brakes, SRP Racing Pedals, Soler Performance Throttle Controller, Dyno Tuned by Trifecta, Velossa Tech Ram Air, Mishimoto Intake, aFe Air Filter, Mishimoto Charge Pipes, ZZP 67mm Throttle Body, Trifecta T40 Stage 2 Turbo, JacFab Recirculation Valve, PTP Turbo Blanket, ZZP Catted Downpipe, Mishimoto Pro Cat-Back Quad Tip Exhaust, Mishimoto Catch Cans, Mishimoto Coolant Reservoir Tank, GM SEMA Grill, Ikon Motorsports Front Fascia Extension, Ikon Motorsports 1LE Spoiler, American Authority ZL1 Side Skirts, AMPP Quad Tip Rear Valance
Last edited by Start The Machine; 11-01-2018 at 05:30 PM. |
|
10-31-2018, 03:18 PM | #18 | |
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
Quote:
Take his screenshots with a grain of salt if you don't agree with them... We tentatively have dyno time scheduled for the 17th so we can get some actual dyno info. To add to this, I believe the JF valve will react differently based on different tuners tunes. When cooper added the valve, his car would not exceed the boost he is shooting for in his tune. Another customer with a tune from a different tuner put the valve on and it was overshooting the boost they wanted to actually be running by 4psi (on the stock valve, they were peaking to 24 just after a shift, and it would taper off to 22psi by redline, where as when he put the valve on it would peak to 28 and taper off to 26 by redline, he had to go in and modify his tune to get the boost back to where he wanted it after putting the valve on). I feel you. It seems that even some people with the stock tune, and the stock valve are getting a sound, which is further amplified by adding a cold air intake. We never designed this part with sound in mind, only performance. Unfortunately eliminating the leaky factory valve only further amplifies the sound that even some stock guys are getting. With a stock intake airbox, I rarely notice it, but I don't currently have a cold air intake to test with at the moment. I am currently running a "stock version" prototype on my car, and with the addition of trying to keep the check engine light off on the stock tune, I am also making an attempt to kill the sound, but seeing as how even some stock valve people are already complaining about the sound, it may not be possible to fix. Last edited by Jason@JacFab; 10-31-2018 at 05:25 PM. |
|
10-31-2018, 03:37 PM | #19 | |
Drives: '23 1SS Sharkskin A10 Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,055
|
Quote:
Sincerely speaking, you cannot go wrong with any of the 3 available engines. There's a price point for everyone without sacrificing performance. I don't plan on racing or immediately tuning mine but I do enjoy the modding, even though it's been minor cosmetic stuff with the exception of the Flowmaster exhaust. Before this I had a 2015 Kia Soul, so as you could imagine, these days I'm like a kid in candy store.
__________________
Previously Owned:
2018 Silver Ice Metallic Camaro R/S 1992 Dark Teal Camaro R/S 305 V8 |
|
10-31-2018, 03:45 PM | #20 |
Drives: '23 1SS Sharkskin A10 Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,055
|
I feel you. It seems that even some people with the stock tune, and the stock valve are getting a sound, which is further amplified by adding a cold air intake. We never designed this part with sound in mind, only performance. Unfortunately eliminating the leaky factory valve only further amplifies the sound that even some stock guys are getting. With a stock intake airbox, I rarely notice it, but I don't currently have a cold air intake to test with at the moment. I am currently running a "stock version" prototype on my car, and with the addition of trying to keep the check engine light off on the stock tune, I am also making an attempt to kill the sound, but seeing as how even some stock valve people are already complaining about the sound, it may not be possible to fix.[/QUOTE]
No worries Jason, you're doing an amazing job and you deserve a lot of credit. I thank you. As soon as stock becomes available for the no-tune version, I will be picking one up. I don't have a CAI, just a K&N high flow air filter so it shouldn't be a deal breaker considering the gain.
__________________
Previously Owned:
2018 Silver Ice Metallic Camaro R/S 1992 Dark Teal Camaro R/S 305 V8 |
10-31-2018, 05:22 PM | #21 |
Drives: 2016 camaro 2.0t gray Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Jacksonville,Fl
Posts: 399
|
I heard a rumor about feeling the wind in your face is that true? @jac fab
|
11-01-2018, 12:04 AM | #22 |
Drives: 2016 M6 2.0T Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 839
|
I think it's just me..... I actually like the sound this thing gives off.
__________________
RS Package, HD Cooling Package, Brembo 6 Piston Front Brakes, SRP Racing Pedals, Soler Performance Throttle Controller, Dyno Tuned by Trifecta, Velossa Tech Ram Air, Mishimoto Intake, aFe Air Filter, Mishimoto Charge Pipes, ZZP 67mm Throttle Body, Trifecta T40 Stage 2 Turbo, JacFab Recirculation Valve, PTP Turbo Blanket, ZZP Catted Downpipe, Mishimoto Pro Cat-Back Quad Tip Exhaust, Mishimoto Catch Cans, Mishimoto Coolant Reservoir Tank, GM SEMA Grill, Ikon Motorsports Front Fascia Extension, Ikon Motorsports 1LE Spoiler, American Authority ZL1 Side Skirts, AMPP Quad Tip Rear Valance
|
11-05-2018, 10:39 AM | #23 |
I wants 1.
|
|
11-05-2018, 02:33 PM | #24 |
Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Vert Summit White Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 113
|
|
11-22-2018, 10:07 AM | #25 |
Drives: 17 Camaro lt, 22 Camaro LT1 Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Beaver, PA
Posts: 411
|
Just put mine on and its awesome! Car rips off idle now and pulls almost to 6k. Little jumpy off idle but I got used to it in a few minutes. Also, its makes the flutter noise almost after every shift but I kinda like it. Still have yet to throw a CEL but did get a service engine soon warning twice. Nice job Jason!
|
11-23-2018, 12:48 PM | #26 | |
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
Quote:
Glad to hear you like it, aside from your weird issue. |
|
11-24-2018, 12:26 PM | #27 |
Drives: 16 2.0 red Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: bloomsburg pa
Posts: 73
|
ats jacfab valve
received a jacfab valve last week, been waiting a while, I have a 16 ats with boost guage, after the install went for a ride, really can;t feel a difference, if anything car doesn't feel as good as with the factory valve. made a couple wide open runs didn't even get a light, I got a tuned valve and the car is not tuned. reason for the tuned valve, I all ready how a valve that leaks, or so that's what i read. Took the valve back off to make sure everything was installed right. the only thing i saw was the cylinder that moves back and forth was sticking, anyone else have that problem. if i knew what i know now, I would,n bought it.
|
11-24-2018, 02:21 PM | #28 | ||||
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
Quote:
To respond to a couple other of the things you said: Quote:
Quote:
To add to this statement of yours. I never get a check engine light after, or during a wide open throttle run. You can do WOT runs all you like, and you probably won't get a check engine light. At least in my experience, and especially now that I know under what conditions, and when a CEL generally pops up, the CEL generally only comes on in the low the mid range operating area, under aggressive part throttle operation, not under WOT. I can drive like a normal guy with the occasional quick burst of fun for weeks and not get the check engine light. But if I'm testing something, or some change, or if I just want to see the light pop up, I CAN drive in such a way to make it pop up at some point during the day, but to get the light to come on, it never involves a wide open throttle run. Quote:
I rigged up an automated arduino cycle test a month or two back to easily test for issues and/or failures, and the valve moved as commanded, when commanded, with no faults, and no leaks. We ran this test for around 30,000 cycles which put the "sticking" theory to rest. As long as it is in the car, and there is boost and/or spring pressure its fine. You've been kind of negative about it for a while, perhaps you were expecting it to do more than it does, so you feel let down. If you want to send it back for inspection, I will gladly cover the shipping costs just to make sure its adjusted and working properly. We set up every single one IN a factory turbo to make sure the everything is correct. I wouldn't mind checking it out if you're not happy, as like I said, you're the only not happy one, and coincidentally, the only one that has been negative about it before even getting one. So I'll leave it up to you, send it back for a full refund if you're not happy, or send it back for inspection and a potential adjustment or replacement. Typically I've found if I put it on and the car feels slower, I've done something wrong. Remove and replace. Generally fixed. Last edited by Jason@JacFab; 11-24-2018 at 04:24 PM. |
||||
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|