Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-16-2017, 11:12 AM   #113
speedraider
 
speedraider's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Z06, 2017 ZL1
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 305
All 4 corners on mine are at 2 1/8 in. to the goodyear line
speedraider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 11:37 AM   #114
bobby35ny


 
bobby35ny's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedraider View Post
All 4 corners on mine are at 2 1/8 in. to the goodyear line
When was you build date?
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
bobby35ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 12:18 PM   #115
RedCamaroZL1
 
RedCamaroZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 281
Checked the other side. 2.5 all around to the line. Not going to change it. It's already low enough that curbs are an issue and my ramps need extenders. If it's a safety or performance issue, then I may change my mind.
__________________
2017 Camaro ZL1 Red Hot A10, PDR, Nav, ECF
RedCamaroZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 12:26 PM   #116
bobby35ny


 
bobby35ny's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedCamaroZL1 View Post
Checked the other side. 2.5 all around to the line. Not going to change it. It's already low enough that curbs are an issue and my ramps need extenders. If it's a safety or performance issue, then I may change my mind.
You are fine, that's where you are supposed to be...
The problem cars are at 2 1/2 rear and 3 and change up front.

-Bobby
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
bobby35ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 12:34 PM   #117
Infern0
Bring It
 
Infern0's Avatar
 
Drives: In Between
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,929
For those that do have the gaps and are not intending to do the replacements, I'm curious about that decision. GM doesn't do anything for free unless they have determined NOT doing something will end up costing them more in the end. As a result, this would seem like much more than a "looks" correction.
__________________

2017 Camaro ZL1 M6 - Everything but the sunroof - Sold

2010 Camaro SS - 650RWHP Daily Driver - Traded
Infern0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 02:20 PM   #118
FringBirdAloha
 
Drives: Pre-production ZL1 M6
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Sunbelt
Posts: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infern0 View Post
For those that do have the gaps and are not intending to do the replacements, I'm curious about that decision. GM doesn't do anything for free unless they have determined NOT doing something will end up costing them more in the end. As a result, this would seem like much more than a "looks" correction.
Almost an inch of front end height can make a noticeable aerodynamic difference.
FringBirdAloha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 03:50 PM   #119
Artos

 
Artos's Avatar
 
Drives: A10 LT4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Deep South TX
Posts: 1,094
This is what I would like clarification on...if it's looks, I don't care.

If it was going to cost them more then I would think it would be a recall?? Wish someone in the know could confirm...I'm also assuming the taller springs were run at the ring' & the ones on all the initial testing?? If so, I have to feel it is cosmetics.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Infern0 View Post
For those that do have the gaps and are not intending to do the replacements, I'm curious about that decision. GM doesn't do anything for free unless they have determined NOT doing something will end up costing them more in the end. As a result, this would seem like much more than a "looks" correction.
Artos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 05:12 PM   #120
Bakilman
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 17
All finished up. 27 1/2 from floor to fender.
Bakilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 07:51 PM   #121
bobby35ny


 
bobby35ny's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bakilman View Post
All finished up. 27 1/2 from floor to fender.
That's GREAT news! The magic inch, LOL
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
bobby35ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 07:58 PM   #122
mdmoore23
 
mdmoore23's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Graniteville,SC
Posts: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infern0 View Post
For those that do have the gaps and are not intending to do the replacements, I'm curious about that decision. GM doesn't do anything for free unless they have determined NOT doing something will end up costing them more in the end. As a result, this would seem like much more than a "looks" correction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artos View Post
This is what I would like clarification on...if it's looks, I don't care.

If it was going to cost them more then I would think it would be a recall?? Wish someone in the know could confirm...I'm also assuming the taller springs were run at the ring' & the ones on all the initial testing?? If so, I have to feel it is cosmetics.
Guys,listen. I used to be a technician for Ford. Bulletins like this indeed come out all the time. It can be strictly for a cosmetic reason. There doesnt have to be a catch22 or other reasoning behind it. I don't know how GM arrived at the decision but there's no need in questioning it. Someone saw that some cars sit too high in the front. They adjusted it. And now we have the ability to correct it if we want. It's that simple.
mdmoore23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 08:35 PM   #123
Biscuit.fr

 
Drives: Red hot ZL1 A10 2017
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: MS Back to France (29)
Posts: 804
My TPW was 04/10
I have the new ones....
May be if they changed the springs on the12th, I may be part of the first ones!
....
Biscuit.fr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2017, 11:39 PM   #124
attilio209
I love my '69.
 
attilio209's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Summit White ZL1
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Modesto, Ca
Posts: 11
The date on my door sill sticker says 04/17.
Measurement from floor to fender:
Rear 28"
Front 28"
The front gap is larger by about .50" from the rear.
Will new springs change this front measurement?
attilio209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 10:35 AM   #125
KLR ZL1
H-Town Camaro Club Member
 
KLR ZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 Hyper Blue Metallic KLR-ZL1
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pearland Tx.
Posts: 2,035
Ok, I just measured mine and the fronts are 2 7/8" and the rears are 1 7/8". So is that correct or not? Build date end of March.
__________________
KLR ZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 11:25 AM   #126
ZED SLED


 
ZED SLED's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Mosaic Bk ZL1 M6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South of Raleigh, NC
Posts: 9,477
Guessing the key here is to measure with the car on a flat level surface like your garage floor. First time i measured was in the parking lot at work. 2 and 3/4 on the front. Sounded too low for old springs and too tall for new ones. Later I measured with it in the garage. 2 and 1/4 on all 4 corners. Build date was 4/13. Looking at parking lot there is a slight incline and a couple of impressions the rears may have been sitting in.
__________________

ZED SLED is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.