12-21-2023, 05:53 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,388
|
Update for my car
So just got the dyno numbers back.
Rebuilt Engine: Spun rear rod bearing+ cracked crankshaft Modifications: 2" SE LT Headers 3" SE X-Pipe K&N Typhoon CAI LT2 ported intake - NEW 95mm ZR1 TB - NEW DIY E85 3" MBRP Axle back (finally) - NEW BTR Stage 1 220 cam - NEW DOD Delete - NEW TCM Tune - (unsure have to find out if they were able to do this) On a heartbreaker dyno:
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | K&N Typhoon CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | DOD Delete | BTR Stage I Cam | ECM, TCM & E85 |Tuned by: Shane Hinds | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq
Last edited by FlukeSS; 12-21-2023 at 06:54 PM. |
12-21-2023, 05:58 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Stansbury Park, Utah
Posts: 1,092
|
And....................
__________________
2016 2SS, MRC, NPP, A8. Procharger P-1X,Stage II,std bypass, 3.9, Alky Meth - 10.84 @129 - DA+2000
New Mods - GPI drop ins, Kooks 2", LT4 fueling, Cam, Circle D Converter, 3.5 pulley & dual nozzle meth. |
12-21-2023, 06:02 PM | #3 |
Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,388
|
And I should be able to pick it up next week?
I guess what you might be looking for is: Assuming a 10% difference from a dynojet Before LT2 Intake + TB + Cam on the Mustang dyno: 413.1 rwhp 429.3 rwtq After mods on the Mustang dyno: 510 = 96.9 rwhp gained 472 = 42.7 rwtq gained
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | K&N Typhoon CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | DOD Delete | BTR Stage I Cam | ECM, TCM & E85 |Tuned by: Shane Hinds | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq
Last edited by FlukeSS; 12-21-2023 at 06:39 PM. |
12-21-2023, 06:22 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2004 BMW 330CI, 2022 1SS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: NC
Posts: 746
|
pretty good bump over stock + 100 HP.
|
12-21-2023, 06:45 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,388
|
Does that seem about right then?
I am not on the same dyno as before, My car dyno'd on a dynojet at 459 rwhp and 477 ft/lbs I was assuming a 10% difference between this mustang dyno and that dynojet. But, I'm having a hard time believing I gained almost 100 rwhp with just the LT2 + TB + Cam?
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | K&N Typhoon CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | DOD Delete | BTR Stage I Cam | ECM, TCM & E85 |Tuned by: Shane Hinds | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq
|
12-21-2023, 08:58 PM | #6 | |
Drives: 2004 BMW 330CI, 2022 1SS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: NC
Posts: 746
|
Quote:
|
|
12-21-2023, 09:26 PM | #7 | |
Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
The base pull was never done before I got the first set of mods. So don't know what the dynojet would say but given the gains shown at 85 hp at the crank, it would have base dyno'd on a dynojet for about 395 rwhp. On a mustang dyno assuming 10% difference it would have base dyno'd for about... 355.5 rwhp. Note: The difference between a mustang dyno and dynojet can range from about 5-15%. I assumed the average of 10%. So all the mods together on that mustang dyno would have given me a gain of about 145rwhp give or take a few from stock. I am asking if those numbers sound about right on average?
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | K&N Typhoon CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | DOD Delete | BTR Stage I Cam | ECM, TCM & E85 |Tuned by: Shane Hinds | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq
|
|
12-21-2023, 09:50 PM | #8 |
Drives: 2004 BMW 330CI, 2022 1SS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: NC
Posts: 746
|
Yeah sorry, no idea I don't know or have any experience with those mods to give you an answer.
|
12-22-2023, 07:43 AM | #9 |
Drives: 19' ZL1 A10, w/pdr Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: S.W. ohio
Posts: 1,557
|
Yes the Mustang dyno can be a heart breaker but, then it just a tool for tuning and with a good tuner very capable. Many variables are used in making that tune and some say the Mustang dyno may be better. I know my numbers really don't match up with others with a similar build but, the seat of the pants performance I get says otherwise. Good luck and happy running on your new build.
__________________
BTR Stg II cam w/ 38% fuel lobe, ARH 2" headers into 3" w/cats, AWE Touring, Kong X port, Weapon X triple ht exchangers, NW 103, Rotofab big gulp, DSX lowside, TCM tune, BMR Lockout, Mustang dyno 720 rwhp, 634 rwtq on 93 pump.
|
12-22-2023, 07:49 AM | #10 | |
Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | K&N Typhoon CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | DOD Delete | BTR Stage I Cam | ECM, TCM & E85 |Tuned by: Shane Hinds | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq
|
|
12-22-2023, 09:13 AM | #11 |
Drives: 2011 GMC Sierra 1500 Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Alabama
Posts: 415
|
^THIS. Glad to hear you got everything sorted.
__________________
2023 LT1 Coupe M6 - Black (GBA) on Black (H1T)
Blade spoiler (5ZU), Recaro seats (AQJ), Technology pack (Y3W) LT1 PBC engine built by Shane Parker Current mileage: 310 |
12-22-2023, 09:52 AM | #12 |
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
|
Good numbers in my opinion and not all Dynjets read higher than Mustangs. There are a whole lot of factors that go into to it. Temps, DA, SAE, Standard on the day of the pulls. I actually talked to Chad this morning and he was telling me that his Zr1 made lots of pulls on a Dynojet before he got his own Mustang Dyno and the numbers were very close to each other so it's not always accurate that the Mustang is stingy in every case. He did drive it on the street also to make sure it was all good and was going to get it on the street again before you pick it up. He was very happy with the results so I know you will be also.
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff
|
12-22-2023, 10:34 AM | #13 |
Drives: like an old lady Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: indiana
Posts: 2,396
|
meh take it back to the track. it trapped 120 before? id look for 128+ now.
__________________
2016+ camaro: everyone’s first car
|
12-22-2023, 01:21 PM | #14 | |
Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
Will find out when the weather turns some time next year.
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | K&N Typhoon CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | DOD Delete | BTR Stage I Cam | ECM, TCM & E85 |Tuned by: Shane Hinds | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|