Homepage Garage Wiki Register Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2015, 06:04 PM   #85
oklapike
 
oklapike's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 45th Anniversary SS Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbls1 View Post
It is reaching; I feel that it isn't necessarily the design that is keeping Malibu behind. The american cars have had to contend with a lingering reputation of poor quality and design that, until roughly a decade or more ago, has gone unanswered. IMO GM started answering the poor quality of their products as long ago as 1995, with better ignition systems and more integrated engine management electronics. Its not amazing that it has taken nearly 20 years for the company to begin to shed its bad skin from the horrible late 70's and 80's. Once GM can universally change customers' impression of their products, I feel that we should see an improvement in sales of its mainstream cars like Malibu. GM and Chevy are getting the message; It wasn't long ago that buyers had to suffer with a marginal design for almost a decade without change. GM is really trying to get back in the forefront of the industry.
Yeah...I posted during my lunch break and might've been in a bit of a hurry. I think I missed what you said about the design.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
behind accord. Fusion is number 3 Altima 2 and Camry is #1.

250K is the sales goal? That is quite the goal, last year they only sold 188K Malibus. even the year before was 200K. I don't think its going to gain 50-70K in sales in one year, maybe in a few but not the first. Like otehr have said the public needs to see how good of a car it is before it starts climbing in with the big boys
Yup, Fusion had a really good March. I was going off of 2014's end of year numbers when I said Fusion was in fourth place.
oklapike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 08:29 PM   #86
shaffe


 
Drives: 2012 Focus
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Burr Ridge
Posts: 4,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by oklapike View Post
Yeah...I posted during my lunch break and might've been in a bit of a hurry. I think I missed what you said about the design.



Yup, Fusion had a really good March. I was going off of 2014's end of year numbers when I said Fusion was in fourth place.
touche
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 09:34 PM   #87
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 ATS 2.0T & '17 Buick LaCrose
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firefighter View Post
Yeah, I don't get why they keep detuning it...

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Repeat after me, "thank you benevolent government for giving us the gift of CAFE, the gift that keeps on giving"
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley Link to Every Camaro photo I've taken in Hi-Resolution
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 09:36 PM   #88
roorback
 
Drives: V8 permagrin
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: here
Posts: 567
i like it but it's too much of a mini-impala. I get why it's done but I wish each model had some character. If one didn't like the impala then they wouldn't consider this either. I hope it does really well but I'm not a buyer.
roorback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 10:41 PM   #89
camaro2lt
 
camaro2lt's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT VR/RS CGM Rally's
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Palmyra, PA
Posts: 5,711
Saw it today in New York and it looks great
Attached Images
    
__________________
camaro2lt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 06:03 AM   #90
King T

 
King T's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS, 2011 Buick Regal Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,379
__________________
King T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 06:32 AM   #91
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Boss 302 RR
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 2,722
Much better than the present model.
__________________
2013 Boss Mustang - Present Toy
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 09:11 AM   #92
SSJ455

 
SSJ455's Avatar
 
Drives: "Blue Saber" 2017 2SS HBM
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lower Hudson Valley
Posts: 1,677
The more I look at the less I am liking it. The front looks too much like a Chrysler 200.
__________________
Lead me not into temptation. I already know the way.
Lana? Lana? LANA! LAAANAAAA!!!!
What?
Dangerzoooooone.

SSJ455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 12:57 PM   #93
King T

 
King T's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS, 2011 Buick Regal Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,379
(Car And Driver)






2016 Chevrolet Malibu
We'd tell you to forget the old Malibu, but that's likely already taken care of.
Quote:
When Chevrolet last redesigned the Malibu, for 2013, the result seemed steeped in indifference—especially compared with the increasingly inventive competition such as the stylish Hyundai Sonata and the Ford Fusion. The Chevy was bland, and worse still, its back seat was more cramped than the preceding model’s. Chevrolet immediately whipped up a slightly improved Malibu the very next year, but it couldn’t fix the itty-bitty back seat—or the car’s basic meh-ness. Now, just three short years later, the Malibu is all-new again, and this time, it sports a fresh look, fresh underpinnings, and fresh engines.

This is One Hot AARP Cardholder
It could be argued that the Malibu’s longevity—this is the ninth generation since the nameplate first appeared in 1964—has everything to do with its inoffensive nature. That’s great for middle America and rental fleets, but today’s mid-size sedan party requires a different sort of costume. Right on cue, the Malibu has inherited a body so stylish, so crisp, that not only will the previous model’s visual Novocain be dissipated, but the Ford Fusion, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Mazda 6, and even the newly sassy Toyota Camry should actually be concerned.

The designers appear to have gotten the memo that the most recent Impala is good-looking, as there is a lot of that car’s styling baked into the 2016 Malibu. Starting with its proportions, the Malibu adopts a “four-door coupe”-ish swept roofline à la Ford Fusion and mixes it well with a long hood and clipped overhangs. The Malibu’s face is sleek, although from some angles, the severe horizontality of the headlights’ top edge lends the mug a droopy appearance. Overall, though, the crisp lines, body-side creases, and neat stance almost left us forgetting the old Malibu’s Play-Doh-squeezed-through-sadness look.

It’s no accident that the Malibu looks longer and lower than the old car—Chevrolet stretched the wheelbase by 3.6 inches, resulting in a nominal 2.3-inch bump in overall length. Width remains the same as before at 73.0 inches, but the hood and cowl are lower, giving the impression of added girth. The size increase really pays off inside, where there’s 1.3 additional inches of rear-seat legroom back-seat passengers no longer need to fold themselves to enter and exit. While the sexy roofline cuts into rear-seat headroom somewhat—the headliner is scooped out to make space for occupants’ noggins on models with the sunroof—legroom is wholly acceptable. Refreshingly, Chevy toned down the Malibu’s interior just enough to banish the old version’s cornucopia of materials and textures, but not so much as to leave the cabin dull and barren. It’s a nice place to occupy, no more, no less.

Underneath the Malibu sits GM’s all-new E2XX front-drive architecture (the outgoing Malibu used the shorter-wheelbase version of the aging Epsilon II platform), a change that results not only in better looks and interior room, but less weight, too. Chevy claims that the 2016 Malibu is more than 300 pounds lighter than before, with a third of that weight savings having come out of the car’s structure. If that weight reduction holds true when we confirm it with our own scales, that would put the new Malibu in the 3200–3300-pound range, which is on the light side of the mid-size class.

Double the Turbo, Double the Fun
If the Malibu’s 300-pound weight reduction sounds good in a vacuum, it’ll sound even better when paired with either of the sedan’s two available gasoline engines. (The hybrid model returns, too—get the full details here.) Last year’s base 2.5-liter four-cylinder is supplanted by a turbocharged 1.5-liter four from GM’s new Ecotec small-engine family. Mated exclusively to a six-speed automatic, the engine comes with auto stop-start, direct fuel injection, and a turbo running a maximum 17 psi of boost. Output stands at 160 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque, which is down 36 horses and 2 lb-ft relative to the previous car’s 2.5-liter four—but real-world performance shouldn’t suffer too much thanks to the Malibu’s diet. Fuel economy, predictably, is up—GM estimates 27 mpg in the city and 37 mpg on the highway, increases of 2 and 1 mpg.

The Malibu’s optional engine is largely carryover: It’s the same 2.0-liter turbocharged four offered on last year’s car, but it has been re-tuned slightly. Just as the 1.5-liter Ecotec is less endowed than the engine it replaces, the 2.0-liter sees some of its might clipped for 2016. The turbo makes 250 horsepower and 258 lb-ft—decent figures that also happen to be 9 horsepower and 37 lb-ft weaker than the outgoing Malibu’s 2.0-liter turbo. Again, the new car’s weight savings should help it keep parity, as should the 2.0-liter’s only transmission, a new eight-speed automatic. It is derived from GM’s 8L90 (seen previously in the Corvette, the Silverado/Sierra, and the big SUVs), albeit turned sideways and adapted for transverse, front-drive applications. We’re told the transmission in this form doesn’t have provisions for hooking up to a transfer case, meaning the Malibu will be strictly front-drive. The Malibu’s lead engineer assures us that this was no accident: No all-wheel drive means the design team didn’t need to beef up the car’s rear end for aft drive components, saving more weight.

Chevrolet people insist that driving enjoyment was a goal for the latest Malibu, something we’re taking with a grain of salt given the old model’s utter lack of passion in such matters. Efforts to imbue the ’Bu with some spice include a dual-motor electric-power-steering setup, which is said to offer greater precision, as well as swapping some of the suspension’s steel pieces for aluminum ones. Oh, and of course there’s the weight loss; reducing weight typically enhances a vehicle’s dynamics.

Never Fear, Safety-Bu is Here
Of greater importance to mid-size sedan buyers than horsepower figures and suspension tuning is the 2016 Malibu’s roster of safety features. Pedestrian detection with automatic braking, lane-keeping assist, lane-departure warning, blind-spot monitoring, forward-collision warning with automatic braking, rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear parking sensors, automatic parking, automatic high beams, and adaptive cruise control are all available. Ten airbags are standard, too, and Chevy is offering a new PIN-protected Teen Driver feature that allows parents to monitor their kids’ driving and set speed-limit warnings, reduce the maximum sound-system volume level, and more, if you’re into that sort of thing.

The system’s various functions are accessible via a new optional eight-inch MyLink infotainment touch screen. With the bigger screen—a seven-incher is available on lower trims—you get navigation, as well as a slightly updated version of MyLink with a faster processor. We sampled this system briefly in a preproduction Malibu, and the new menu structure seems intuitive (it’s the same in the seven-inch setup but without the quicker brain), while inputs are dispatched quickly and without fuss. To our utter disbelief, we were informed that the new MyLink’s basic underpinnings were pilfered from Cadillac’s maligned CUE infotainment system, proving that you really can polish a . . . you get it.

Pricing for the Malibu has yet to be released, but buyers will be offered four trim levels: L, LS, LT, and a new “Premier” spec that replaces the now-defunct LTZ. Every Malibu will come with GM’s 4G LTE data connection with a wireless hotspot and three months of free data. The LS comes standard with a backup camera, active grille shutters, and the smaller of the two MyLink touch screens; the LT adds LED running lights; and the Premier gets LED taillights, two rear-seat USB ports and a 110-volt power outlet, a wireless phone charger (integrated nicely in the form of a center-console charging “slot” that you simply drop your phone into), leather seats, ventilated seats, and the eight-inch MyLink setup.

When it goes on sale in the fourth quarter of this year, the 2016 Malibu should set Chevrolet back on course in the mid-size race. Final judgment, however, will need to wait until we drive the new sedan. Only then will we know how much the competition should have to fear from Chevy.
__________________
King T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 01:12 PM   #94
2SScamaro2010
 
2SScamaro2010's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS M6
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 267
That actually looks pretty good. Too bad I already bought a fusion for the wife
__________________
Mods: SW Retro Chambered cat back, CAI cai black, APEX scoop and ww tank, RX catch can, APEX Skip-shift Eliminator, Hurst short throw, Speeddawg knob, Kooks 1 7/8 headers high flow cats, BMR trailing arms and toe rods, Livernois dyno tune, ZL1 grill and side skirts.WHP: 415 WTQ: 407
2SScamaro2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 02:02 PM   #95
roorback
 
Drives: V8 permagrin
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: here
Posts: 567
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSJ455 View Post
The more I look at the less I am liking it. The front looks too much like a Chrysler 200.
I tend to agree. The more you look at it the more you see the resemblance.
roorback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 02:38 PM   #96
stoopid

 
Drives: 4 wheels
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: anyplace, USA
Posts: 1,177
The new Malibu looks like the new Chrysler 200, which looks like an Impala, which looks like a Chrysler 300, which looks like a Lincoln...
stoopid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 05:14 PM   #97
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 ATS 2.0T & '17 Buick LaCrose
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,430
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoopid View Post
The new Malibu looks like the new Chrysler 200, which looks like an Impala, which looks like a Chrysler 300, which looks like a Lincoln...
Which looks like a 57 Chevy Bel Air......................BA BINGGGGGGGGGG, mother and father of all great Chevrolets
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley Link to Every Camaro photo I've taken in Hi-Resolution
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 05:28 PM   #98
Q'smuscle
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro VR 2SS/RS & Impala
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Riverside,ca
Posts: 5,342
Ugly! The current one has it's on identity and looks more sportier . This is too much like the okay looking impala but neither car looks like anything . I guess Chrysler and Ford stole all the great idea's. I hope it sells like GM think it will. Lol....
Q'smuscle is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.