09-24-2011, 06:34 PM | #1 |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
Which first gen. Camaro was top dog?
Which first gen. PRODUCTION Camaro was top dog? This topic has been argued on these and many other forums thousands of times. I was browsing through some '69 Chevrolet brochures online and came across this:
"We'll start with our strongest. Z/28 Camaro." That tells me that Chevrolet considered the Z/28 to be the top dog, that's good enough for me! Clyde Last edited by wildpaws; 09-25-2011 at 07:23 AM. Reason: Text addition |
09-24-2011, 06:53 PM | #2 |
Camaro owner since 1982
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS-RS Conv IBM L99 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,651
|
I'd say an SS396 with aluminum heads was top dog. Try finding an original of those!
__________________
2012 Camaro RS-SS Conv IBM, L99
1968 Camaro RS Coupe 327 AT 1968 Camaro RS-SS Conv, sold 1993 |
09-24-2011, 06:55 PM | #3 |
Drives: 2 LT/RS YELLOW, AUTO., VIN NO. 602 Join Date: May 2010
Location: LAVAL (10 min. north of Montreal), CANADA
Posts: 3,526
|
1969 ZL1 COPO
__________________
T2 Facia, ACS TL1 Hood, ACS Winglets. G5CR CAI. Hotchsic Strut Brace and more...
|
09-24-2011, 07:08 PM | #4 |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
Read Chevy's own ad copy, I'm telling you what they thought. Yes the ZL1 in '69 was a brute, raw horsepower and great for 1/4 mile runs. Obviously though, an obscure engine package that was not a general production package (remember, only 69 ZL1s were made that year) could not be the top dog production model. I don't think anyone argues that the COPOs or the Yenko, Balwin/Motion, etc. Camaros were the top dog production package either. I think the Z/28 qualified as a general production package since a little over 20,000 of them were made in '69. The argument by many has always been that the SS (especially the BB 396cid versions) were the top dog production Camaro back then, this brochure from Chevy back then seems to say otherwise in Chevrolet's opinion (and they do mention BB 396 in the text).
Clyde |
09-24-2011, 07:09 PM | #5 |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
|
09-24-2011, 07:37 PM | #6 |
Institutionally Insane
|
Yenko 427 ZL-1 COPO
__________________
It's got a cop motor, a 440 cubic inch plant, it's got cop tires, cop suspension, cop shocks. It's a model made before catalytic converters so it'll run good on regular gas. What do you say, is it the new Bluesmobile or what?
|
09-24-2011, 08:24 PM | #7 |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
|
09-24-2011, 09:05 PM | #8 |
Drives: GMC Acadia, Chevrolet Camaro Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Winter Springs FL
Posts: 1,657
|
This is framed hanging in the garage.
You know how I'm voting. Last edited by Fightinfire921; 07-28-2012 at 04:08 PM. |
09-24-2011, 09:33 PM | #9 |
Too Many Great Choices
Drives: Grand Sport/Z07 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: A Mountain Road
Posts: 7,454
|
I'm with you Clyde. The Z28 was a OEM racecar for the street/masses. No other regular production Camaro was.
|
09-24-2011, 10:15 PM | #10 |
Don't Like it? Suggit.
|
Personally I love the look of the 68s... If I can land one, the sky's the proverbial limit when it comes to performance
__________________
"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!" A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp |
09-25-2011, 12:10 AM | #11 | |
Drives: 2019 F150 RCSB Abyss FX4 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,277
|
Quote:
|
|
09-25-2011, 12:23 AM | #12 |
Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP 2010 Traverse LTZ Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roanoke,TX
Posts: 665
|
L78 396.
|
09-25-2011, 07:25 AM | #13 | |
Drives: 1999 Blazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
|
Quote:
Clyde Last edited by wildpaws; 09-25-2011 at 07:26 AM. Reason: text correction |
|
09-25-2011, 07:40 AM | #14 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 89 IROC 350 Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Back roads, southern Ohio
Posts: 12,504
|
Who gives a crap... You will never get a definite answer. Some will say SS, some will say Z/28... It was 45 years ago, no one the was around at GM then likely still is.
Z/28 - track car built for performance. Crappy road manners. SS - came in many forms... I.e. Power plants. Better car for on the street but the Z was probably a little more race oriented. IF and a huge IF there is a looming Z release, it will likely be a race inspired car, built for performance, low, loud, rough and bad to the bone. Look up a Cobra R. Like that. No ac, no radio, no back seat... lots of power... lots of money... few made. Last edited by IROCanSS; 09-25-2011 at 07:51 AM. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PEDDERS SUCCESSFULLY FITS 305s ON ALL 4 CORNERS! | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 467 | 06-11-2013 09:45 PM |
GT5 Camaro pics | brantley847 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 93 | 05-27-2013 08:35 PM |
Think about this and the Z28 5th gen | 13F20 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 41 | 09-04-2010 12:59 AM |
The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 106 | 10-19-2009 06:08 PM |