Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-18-2019, 03:48 PM   #6259
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2020 Colorado
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,371
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
Apparently an 8+ liter gasoline V8 is in the works for future GM/Navistar commercial trucks.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation
2020 Chevrolet Colorado W/T Extended Cab (State-issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2019, 04:04 PM   #6260
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Apparently an 8+ liter gasoline V8 is in the works for future GM/Navistar commercial trucks.
That will take LS/LT factory displacement to a whole new level! I suppose Ford's 7.3 gasser has some influence, but I am surprised to see them going to that extent after announcing the 6.6 and using the 6.0 for over 15 years.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2019, 04:13 PM   #6261
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Apparently an 8+ liter gasoline V8 is in the works for future GM/Navistar commercial trucks.
Which would be in the 500ish cubic inch range
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-99SS View Post
That will take LS/LT factory displacement to a whole new level! I suppose Ford's 7.3 gasser has some influence, but I am surprised to see them going to that extent after announcing the 6.6 and using the 6.0 for over 15 years.
Yeah, it is a surprise. But if its going to be for the medium duty (4500/5500/etc) type trucks I can see a case for it.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2019, 04:58 PM   #6262
Martinjlm
Retired from GM
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-99SS View Post
That will take LS/LT factory displacement to a whole new level! I suppose Ford's 7.3 gasser has some influence, but I am surprised to see them going to that extent after announcing the 6.6 and using the 6.0 for over 15 years.
I would be very surprised if it is done off the small block. The 7.0 was about as far as anyone dared stretch the small block. There used to be an 8.1L big block V8 for Medium Duty back in the late 80s early 90s. I would expect a modernized version of something like that.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2019, 07:34 PM   #6263
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinjlm View Post
I would be very surprised if it is done off the small block. The 7.0 was about as far as anyone dared stretch the small block. There used to be an 8.1L big block V8 for Medium Duty back in the late 80s early 90s. I would expect a modernized version of something like that.
Good point. The special tall-deck LSX block maxes out at 454 cubes I think (7.4L). But given all that they had to do to hit those kinds of numbers, I don't see how GM could go with small block architecture for an 8L plus heavy/medium duty truck engines. Maybe if they did a small block based V10 ... but that would probably be more work than just doing a new big block V8 line.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 08:00 AM   #6264
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinjlm View Post
I would be very surprised if it is done off the small block. The 7.0 was about as far as anyone dared stretch the small block. There used to be an 8.1L big block V8 for Medium Duty back in the late 80s early 90s. I would expect a modernized version of something like that.
Another "modernized" BBC...that would be surprising. The LSx 454 already has the tall deck block capable of over 500 cubes. I would be much more surprised to see another "new" BBC from GM, than a big bore LS/LT.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 09:03 AM   #6265
lbls1


 
lbls1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS SOM; 2015 Malibu LTZ
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,021
^Didn't GM halt production of their big block motors altogether? I could understand if an extreme duty, off road vehicle would require an engine at that size and torque, but my understanding was that GM was doing just fine with their 6 liter duramax motors for high torque applications. I would love to see the big motors made again, but with the state of the automotive industry (even with CAFE and fuel requirements in limbo) I highly doubt that there are plans to manufacture large and inefficient engines.
__________________
'02 CAMARO SS SOM; 5.7L LS1/FLS6B
'08 TBSS AWD Black Granite Metallic
'15 Malibu LTZ 2LZ Turbo

'14 CAMARO ZL1 Blue Ray Metallic
lbls1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 09:41 AM   #6266
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbls1 View Post
^Didn't GM halt production of their big block motors altogether? I could understand if an extreme duty, off road vehicle would require an engine at that size and torque, but my understanding was that GM was doing just fine with their 6 liter duramax motors for high torque applications. I would love to see the big motors made again, but with the state of the automotive industry (even with CAFE and fuel requirements in limbo) I highly doubt that there are plans to manufacture large and inefficient engines.
So the 8.1 BBC based Vortec has been dead since 2010.

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/gm-v...n-big-brother/

No way will a Vortec/BBC meet today's emissions standards.

6.0L was a great engine, but terrible on fuel. Hoping the new 6.6L gasser does better, even though I would never own an HD truck without the 6.6L Duramax diesel.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 11:41 AM   #6267
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbls1 View Post
^Didn't GM halt production of their big block motors altogether? I could understand if an extreme duty, off road vehicle would require an engine at that size and torque, but my understanding was that GM was doing just fine with their 6 liter duramax motors for high torque applications. I would love to see the big motors made again, but with the state of the automotive industry (even with CAFE and fuel requirements in limbo) I highly doubt that there are plans to manufacture large and inefficient engines.
I'm 99% sure that all trucks over 8500 lb (10,000 for vans & SUVs) gross vehicle weight rating (curb weight + payload) are exempt from CAFE . So basically anything bigger than a half ton doesn't contribute to an automakers CAFE score. I think it has something to do with vehicles of that size being considered commercial rather than passenger vehicles.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 11:50 AM   #6268
Martinjlm
Retired from GM
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbls1 View Post
^Didn't GM halt production of their big block motors altogether? I could understand if an extreme duty, off road vehicle would require an engine at that size and torque, but my understanding was that GM was doing just fine with their 6 liter duramax motors for high torque applications. I would love to see the big motors made again, but with the state of the automotive industry (even with CAFE and fuel requirements in limbo) I highly doubt that there are plans to manufacture large and inefficient engines.
Ironically, it was one of the first two or three “end of production” programs I led in my first middle management job. As Manager - Engine Service Operations, one of my assignments was to take old programs out of production while maintaining capability for customers to get service parts. My first three programs were the Big Block V8s (7.4L / 8.1L / 8.2L), the original 4.3L V6, and the THM400 transmission. I just don’t remember what order they were in.

Fun Fact: The Chief Engineer for the Big Block engine when I took it out of production was Bill Large. At the same time I was working with a guy named Bruce Bruce and a buyer whose name was Les Purchas. I can’t make that stuff up.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 12:46 PM   #6269
lbls1


 
lbls1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS SOM; 2015 Malibu LTZ
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,021
^I'll stay tuned then. Not everyday we actually get someone directly involved in the mfg. of the cars/trucks/products. Very good to know.
__________________
'02 CAMARO SS SOM; 5.7L LS1/FLS6B
'08 TBSS AWD Black Granite Metallic
'15 Malibu LTZ 2LZ Turbo

'14 CAMARO ZL1 Blue Ray Metallic
lbls1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 12:47 PM   #6270
lbls1


 
lbls1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS SOM; 2015 Malibu LTZ
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
I'm 99% sure that all trucks over 8500 lb (10,000 for vans & SUVs) gross vehicle weight rating (curb weight + payload) are exempt from CAFE . So basically anything bigger than a half ton doesn't contribute to an automakers CAFE score. I think it has something to do with vehicles of that size being considered commercial rather than passenger vehicles.
Good to know. I wasn't sure.
__________________
'02 CAMARO SS SOM; 5.7L LS1/FLS6B
'08 TBSS AWD Black Granite Metallic
'15 Malibu LTZ 2LZ Turbo

'14 CAMARO ZL1 Blue Ray Metallic
lbls1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 01:13 PM   #6271
lbls1


 
lbls1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS SOM; 2015 Malibu LTZ
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
GM-trucks.com posted up a rumor in reference to an LT4 powered Silverado SS.

Keyword rumor.
I just stumbled onto this. That would bring a lot of excitement to the brand.

But (apologizing for my honesty) they must do something with the design. The Silverado is a nightmare. It needs some consolidation at the front clip. The body and side profiles actually are good. I would spring for a 460hp LT4 or vortex twin cab Silvie (uh boy....here we go again....).
__________________
'02 CAMARO SS SOM; 5.7L LS1/FLS6B
'08 TBSS AWD Black Granite Metallic
'15 Malibu LTZ 2LZ Turbo

'14 CAMARO ZL1 Blue Ray Metallic
lbls1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2019, 02:27 PM   #6272
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbls1 View Post
I just stumbled onto this. That would bring a lot of excitement to the brand.

But (apologizing for my honesty) they must do something with the design. The Silverado is a nightmare. It needs some consolidation at the front clip. The body and side profiles actually are good. I would spring for a 460hp LT4 or vortex twin cab Silvie (uh boy....here we go again....).
460 LT4? You can get an 18 or 19 6.2L with 420hp already. 40hp is easy to add to these truck 6.2s.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Tags
fenwickhockey65, gm questions, questions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.