Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-02-2016, 11:29 AM   #43
KEL995
 
Drives: 2016 1SS Manual
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by KyleL View Post
I'm not too far from orange, tx. I'd be ok with letting y'all use my car
I myself am very close to Orange Texas

-Keith

225 in the house! Geaux Tigers>!!
KEL995 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 09:32 AM   #44
Aaron at SDPC
 
Drives: Camaro Z28
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 36
Very nice work. Look forward to seeing some more results.
Aaron at SDPC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2016, 12:37 PM   #45
E-Ray

 
E-Ray's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Nightfall Grey
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sulphur La.
Posts: 1,680
You guys are just 20 min. from my house, I need to come and if you can beef up my Edelbrock E-Force tune. Would be nice to know how much power the canned Edelbrocks tune is putting out.
__________________
2016 Camaro 2SS, Nightfall Grey,
MRC, NPP, S/R, Nav, A8,
E-Force Supercharged.



Last edited by E-Ray; 09-07-2016 at 01:06 PM.
E-Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2016, 12:06 PM   #46
Gmanuel
 
Drives: 2007 335i
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dallas
Posts: 144
Any news on this kit?
Gmanuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2016, 04:10 PM   #47
Ian SS

 
Ian SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS, 2017 JKU Wrangler
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 876
Thought they were going to give production and pricing info back in July, its been a while.
__________________
SLO 1SS - sold
1SS MRC NPP 6MT

2018 Ram Rebel 4x4 5.7
Ian SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 09:09 AM   #48
DJGold
 
DJGold's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro 1SS 2017
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Quebec City, Canada
Posts: 66
I guess this is dead.
__________________
Camaro 1SS 2017, M6, NPP, white.

Mods:
Secondary Cat Delete
BMR Lowering Springs
Lexani Wraith BG Wheels
20x8.5, 20x10
DJGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2016, 02:52 PM   #49
Ian SS

 
Ian SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS, 2017 JKU Wrangler
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 876
Trying to be patient
Attached Images
 
__________________
SLO 1SS - sold
1SS MRC NPP 6MT

2018 Ram Rebel 4x4 5.7
Ian SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2016, 10:08 PM   #50
750x
 
Drives: Charger Hellcat
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDCoon View Post
Yes it does seem like this is taking a while to build and test. We have been testing several different waste gate configurations and working on the tuning side. We want this to be the most thought through and well designed kit you could ask for. We have worked with several different turbo companies on other vehicles and never like to fight the fitment or quality.

We are using a custom manifold on one side and a stock manifold on the other.
Wouldn't that affect tune etc running a better flowing manifold on one side of the motor/bank and the other far more restrictive??
750x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2016, 10:53 PM   #51
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by 750x View Post
Wouldn't that affect tune etc running a better flowing manifold on one side of the motor/bank and the other far more restrictive??
No. the turbo is the greatest restriction so it ends up being equal for both banks.
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2016, 11:45 PM   #52
750x
 
Drives: Charger Hellcat
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 19
How's that? I've seen in the past where bad flowing manifold has lead to high egts etc, causing some cylinders to run lean and go crazy on knock.. if you gonna swap manifolds just do both I find it half ass to have one better flowing and running a OEM manifold lol.. like running one long tube header with the other being OEM.. foolish..
750x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 01:24 PM   #53
strokerls1
 
Drives: 2015 Charger Hellcat
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Flowery Branch, GA
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by 750x View Post
How's that? I've seen in the past where bad flowing manifold has lead to high egts etc, causing some cylinders to run lean and go crazy on knock.. if you gonna swap manifolds just do both I find it half ass to have one better flowing and running a OEM manifold lol.. like running one long tube header with the other being OEM.. foolish..
I would agree with this but doesnt the lt1 already use a tubular style manifold? I ran the on3 kit on my 5th gen 1le and it used a similar design except the ls3 manifold was a lot more restrictive. I would think this kit would be better designed. On a side note, how do you like the charger hellcat? Ive had mine for about 3 months and have been fighting a cel for fuel pressure for a month now. '15 charger.
strokerls1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 02:39 PM   #54
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
It isn't uncommon to have a plan 2-1 pressure ratio with a basic turbo kit. That means at 8psi of boost there will likely be 16psi of pressure in the manifolds pre turbo. All they have to do is direct the exhaust gases to the turbo. There is no scavenging or anything special going on. I have made over 1000rwhp on a similar set up. Stock manifold feeding into the back of a log feeding into the turbo(pt88). Nothing seemed optimal but it worked fine.

You can spend days trying to optimize a kit but in the end you use what fits and guess what, It works.
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 03:39 PM   #55
750x
 
Drives: Charger Hellcat
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by strokerls1 View Post
I would agree with this but doesnt the lt1 already use a tubular style manifold? I ran the on3 kit on my 5th gen 1le and it used a similar design except the ls3 manifold was a lot more restrictive. I would think this kit would be better designed. On a side note, how do you like the charger hellcat? Ive had mine for about 3 months and have been fighting a cel for fuel pressure for a month now. '15 charger.
I've never had any issues with the fuel or cel. Have you taken it to dealership?
750x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2016, 05:14 PM   #56
Perdieu
 
Perdieu's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Nightfall Grey Auto 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Blue Springs MO.
Posts: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by parish8 View Post
It isn't uncommon to have a plan 2-1 pressure ratio with a basic turbo kit. That means at 8psi of boost there will likely be 16psi of pressure in the manifolds pre turbo. All they have to do is direct the exhaust gases to the turbo. There is no scavenging or anything special going on. I have made over 1000rwhp on a similar set up. Stock manifold feeding into the back of a log feeding into the turbo(pt88). Nothing seemed optimal but it worked fine.

You can spend days trying to optimize a kit but in the end you use what fits and guess what, It works.
He's 110% correct..

This was the set up on my GTO.. ran 9's drove it everywhere ,put over 30,000 miles on it with out any issues..
Attached Images
 
Perdieu is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.