Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-31-2020, 06:18 AM   #15
wnta1ss

 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NH
Posts: 1,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ajs16400 View Post
So you can run a magnuson 2300 (states 6psi on website) with a lt4 low pressure pump, high pressure pump and injectors on e85 and still not max it out?
Probably not. The example that KingLT1 was referencing from ADM Performance was done with the smaller 1740 blower (slowed down from Z06 spec), not a 2300. Quite possible that the bigger 2300 blower with it's base 98mm pulley takes more to run (crank drag) than that slowed-down 1740 did, which means that more fuel would need to be burned.
wnta1ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2020, 08:37 AM   #16
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,798
The difference in parasitic pumping loss between the 1.74 and 2300 is minimal...especially at 6psi. Aside from that if Ted Jenetty was able to run E60 @ 9psi with a Whipple 2.9, then I am pretty sure you could turn it down to 5-6psi and run 17% more ethanol being most pump E85 is actually E77. I also have done quite a bit of experimenting with different ethanol percentages and boost levels on my car so I have seen first hand how much fueling demand changes when adding boost or reducing Ethanol percentage. And even if for some reason the OP came up short on being able to run full pump E85, then it's really easy to mix. 70/30 ratio usually nets E60 and it would still make more power then running 7-8psi on 93 octane.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA

Last edited by KingLT1; 10-31-2020 at 08:52 AM.
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2020, 09:18 AM   #17
ramairroughneck
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 239
LT4 is the cheapest, has the best power band in the range you seek, and is the lightest
ramairroughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2020, 10:40 AM   #18
gtfoxy
Account Suspended
 
Drives: '21 Wild Cherry ZL1
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 2,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
The difference in parasitic pumping loss between the 1.74 and 2300 is minimal...especially at 6psi. Aside from that if Ted Jenetty was able to run E60 @ 9psi with a Whipple 2.9, then I am pretty sure you could turn it down to 5-6psi and run 17% more ethanol being most pump E85 is actually E77. I also have done quite a bit of experimenting with different ethanol percentages and boost levels on my car so I have seen first hand how much fueling demand changes when adding boost or reducing Ethanol percentage. And even if for some reason the OP came up short on being able to run full pump E85, then it's really easy to mix. 70/30 ratio usually nets E60 and it would still make more power then running 7-8psi on 93 octane.
Do all states switch to ~E70 winter blend or is that just us northern states?
gtfoxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2020, 12:38 PM   #19
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,798
Not sure but I think it's mostly the snow belt region.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2020, 07:06 AM   #20
laynlo15
 
laynlo15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
My stations will probably go down to about E50 this winter in Missouri so I'll switch over to 93 so I can drive it all winter when the weather is good. You really don't want to have a full tank of E and leave it set a long time as alcohol is hard on everything it touches.
The biggest problem with the Lt4 is heat soak, it maybe the cheapest but by for not even close to the best. That's why so many Zl1 and Z06 guys get rid of them.
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2020, 07:16 AM   #21
Ajs16400
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS Convertible
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Wentzville Missouri
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by laynlo15 View Post
My stations will probably go down to about E50 this winter in Missouri so I'll switch over to 93 so I can drive it all winter when the weather is good. You really don't want to have a full tank of E and leave it set a long time as alcohol is hard on everything it touches.
The biggest problem with the Lt4 is heat soak, it maybe the cheapest but by for not even close to the best. That's why so many Zl1 and Z06 guys get rid of them.

With that said isnt to much heat in the cylinders the main cause of failure to the lt1 piston rings?
Ajs16400 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2020, 08:00 AM   #22
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,798
I don't believe heat soak would be a issue with the LT4 when turned down. Keep in mind the LT1 makes more power per lb of boost then a LT4 because it has a 1.5 point higher compression. So it will make the same power as as LT4 on 6-7psi vs the 9-10psi. The Caveat is you have to use a lot more octane to maintain that advantage once you get above 600whp or so because the LT1 runs into a octane wall on 93 pump at about 8-9psi.

I do agree tho I would start with a larger supercharger if going through all the effort of installing one. I seen some used 2300's for 5k which isn't a bad deal. However if the OP is truly content on staying under 600whp then the LT4 supercharger turned down to 5-7psi on E60-E85 would perform really well. None of the larger superchargers really hold any advantage at these lower boost levels. I prefer to run more timing and octane with less boost. Only add more boost if you can still maintain MBT timing.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2020, 08:17 AM   #23
laynlo15
 
laynlo15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
I met a guy at the track yesterday with a stock zl1 and Roto Fab and he was going to do a 2650 Maggie this winter and that was his biggest complaint, heat soak and his was bone stock. He had considered a ported Lt4 and they make good power but you can't change the cooling issues it has. I would agree it won't be as bad with lower boost but it will still be there when you push it hard.
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2020, 08:17 AM   #24
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
The difference in parasitic pumping loss between the 1.74 and 2300 is minimal...especially at 6psi. Aside from that if Ted Jannetty was able to run E60 @ 9psi with a Whipple 2.9, then I am pretty sure you could turn it down to 5-6psi and run 17% more ethanol being most pump E85 is actually E77. I also have done quite a bit of experimenting with different ethanol percentages and boost levels on my car so I have seen first hand how much fueling demand changes when adding boost or reducing Ethanol percentage. And even if for some reason the OP came up short on being able to run full pump E85, then it's really easy to mix. 70/30 ratio usually nets E60 and it would still make more power then running 7-8psi on 93 octane.
A lot of info in this thread so I just want it to be clear that was With an LT4 fuel System, not LT1 fuel system.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2020, 08:19 AM   #25
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
With an LT4 fuel System, not LT1 fuel system.
That is what I said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
No that is the LT1 fuel system. ADM performance documented a few years that you can run e85 with the LT4 fuel system up to 6psi of boost on a otherwise stock LT1 engine. The Ted Jenetty also documented that you can run up to 9psi on E60 with the LT4 fuel system on a LT1. The LT4 engines can get up to E70 or so at stock boost(9-10psi) because the LT4 cam has a larger fuel lobe to drive the high side pump.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2020, 08:21 AM   #26
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
That is what I said.
I see that, I just didn't want that detail to get lost in the thread.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2020, 08:30 AM   #27
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
I see that, I just didn't want that detail to get lost in the thread.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2020, 08:50 AM   #28
Juiced1
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2012 2SS CAMARO 45th
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 18,663
The LT4 swap will be your cheapest route and as you've read above you can make solid power with it. If you don't love the idea of tossing a LT4 blower on we can get some amazing deals on Whipple and Magnuson
Juiced1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.