Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2015, 11:43 AM   #1
Roto-fab 1



 
Roto-fab 1's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS w/ Roto-fab CAI
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,682
Roto-fab CAI vs. Z28 CAI

We've seen many questions about the Z28 intake and how it stacks up against some of the aftermarket CAI systems. We can't speak for others, but here is some good information shared with us about a head to head comparison of the Roto-fab CAI and the stock Z28 CAI.
The following is the actual email we received from Lethal Racing about their testing. In comparison to the Z28 CAI he Roto-fab CAI showed an improvement of about 4 HP and 6 ft/lb tq. Keep in mind this is a comparison of the Roto-fab and the Z28 intake, NOT the standard Camaro intake.

From: Lethal Racing [mailto:lethalracing219@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 11:35 AM
To: sales@roto-fab.com
Subject: Fwd: roto compare

Hi,

Here is the graph showing the rotofab intake on a 2015 Z28 VS the stock Z28 intake(which is pretty good from the factory). The blue line is the Rotofab, Purple is the Stock intake.

Mods on the Z28 are:
Ported heads
ported intake and tb
Lethal Racing Phantom cam
Yella Terra rocker arms
Coated 1 7/8"headers without cats
LR dyno tune
93 octane




thanks,
nick
--
337-258-7692
lethal@lethalracing.com






Roto-fab 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 12:11 PM   #2
Sales@Phastek



 
Sales@Phastek's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,817
Very nice!!!

Always great to see improvements!!

Thank you,
Ricardo
__________________
Sales@Phastek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 12:14 PM   #3
GONIF


 
GONIF's Avatar
 
Drives: 73 VETTE ,, 05 2500hd diesel,14 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The Left lane PHOENIX AZ
Posts: 2,626
Never doubted the Rotofab was better.
__________________
OLD GUY FLYING FAST AND LOW
GONIF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 01:09 PM   #4
Camarotobeornottobe
 
Drives: 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
I'm not a Rotofab hater, and this is good info. But, it is done on a Z28 with multiple mods. Before everyone jumps to conclusions, it is worth noting that the results cannot be applied to LS3s or L99s, particularly with no mods. The results might be totally different there.
Camarotobeornottobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 01:10 PM   #5
Camarotobeornottobe
 
Drives: 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
I would love to see a back-to-back comparision of the Rotofab versus Z28 intake on an otherwise unmodded SS (with no tune).
Camarotobeornottobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 01:17 PM   #6
krisprz2010camaross

 
krisprz2010camaross's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2ss/Rs Transformers
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Yorba Linda, California
Posts: 1,564
How about roto-fab vs vararam intake tune and non-tune model. That is something I would like to see.
__________________
YouTube:Krisprz garage
Insta:kris__perez & krisprz_garage
LS3 conversion
Vararam intake(tune model)
Kooks LT headers & cats delete
Corsa ZL1 3" exhaust
RedBarn Racing Tune
CMS Stage 3 Cam
AFR CNC ported heads
MSD Spark plug wires
LNC-2000 Launch controller
NGK TR6 Spark Plugs
1le strut tower brace-TPIS spacers
Nick Williams 102mm throttle body
Fast lsxr 102 intake manifold
Slp 25% UDP
Katech Tensioner Pulley
Circle D 3600-3700 multi disk Stall
GM 3.91 gears
DDS carbon fiber driveshaft
ZL1 fuel pump & injectors
Flex fuel sensor(91/E85)
https://wheelwell.com/kris-perez
krisprz2010camaross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 01:22 PM   #7
Camarotobeornottobe
 
Drives: 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by krisprz2010camaross View Post
How about roto-fab vs vararam intake tune and non-tune model. That is something I would like to see.
It would have to be for the non-tune version to get a real comparison. Introducing tunes to both intakes would introduce additional variables that would make the comparison invalid.
Camarotobeornottobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 05:43 PM   #8
Joseph1LE

 
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS 1LE, 2001 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Miami
Posts: 836
That engine bay though...
__________________
2017 GMC Canyon All Terrain- daily driver/dirt bike hauler

2015 Camaro SS 1LE- sold
2001 Camaro SS SOM M6- sold
1999 Firebird Formula A4- sold
Joseph1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2015, 03:24 AM   #9
MrChrisLS3


 
Drives: 2018 1SS M6
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,617
$400 for 4 ponies...pass
MrChrisLS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2015, 04:19 AM   #10
el ess A
Older Than Dirt
 
el ess A's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 & 2013 Camaros
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrChrisLS3 View Post
$400 for 4 ponies...pass
You're missing the point. The comparison was against a Z/28 intake which costs about $400 (if you're not dumb enough to pay retail) vs. a rotofab which costs about the same. The claim is rotofab is 4 hp and 6 ft/lb > than Z/28 intake.

Which, to me, based on one single test, (one point a trend does not make) means the Z/28 intake works about as good as the other aftermarkets making my choice even easier.

Because what you DO get with the Z/28 intake that the others don't give you is an already-installed MAF and a DRY filter and a PERFECT fit. The MAF alone is around $75 or more retail and the worry about over-oiling a filter is a thing of the past.

No knock on rotofab, as they're intakes function as well as look good, too.
__________________
2010 2SS TE, 1 of 822/2013 Camaro ZL1 vert, 1 of 54

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=26108&dateline=142898  4774
el ess A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2015, 08:37 AM   #11
Msingh
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 12 Black Camaro LS M6
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 336
I love my rotofab.. we picked up 3 of them over the c5 fest in KY. 3 different people in my club.
Msingh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2015, 09:20 AM   #12
Roto-fab 1



 
Roto-fab 1's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS w/ Roto-fab CAI
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msingh View Post
I love my rotofab.. we picked up 3 of them over the c5 fest in KY. 3 different people in my club.
I'm glad you like the products and we certainly appreciate your support. I remember your group from the Fest.
Roto-fab 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2015, 11:24 AM   #13
Roto-fab 1



 
Roto-fab 1's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS w/ Roto-fab CAI
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarotobeornottobe View Post
I'm not a Rotofab hater, and this is good info. But, it is done on a Z28 with multiple mods. Before everyone jumps to conclusions, it is worth noting that the results cannot be applied to LS3s or L99s, particularly with no mods. The results might be totally different there.
Good points. Again, this isn't a test we conducted-just sharing some results found on one particular application. However, it certainly shows our intake is competitive or in some cases better than one of the popular alternatives to the stock SS intake.
In addition to performance, our intake offers you the ability to customize to your tastes or match the theme you have under the hood. With tons of Camaros out there it's nice to pop the hood and have something a little different than the guy next to you.

Last edited by Roto-fab 1; 08-24-2015 at 10:39 AM. Reason: typo
Roto-fab 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2015, 12:55 PM   #14
dontlift19
 
Drives: 2012 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by el ess A View Post
You're missing the point. The comparison was against a Z/28 intake which costs about $400 (if you're not dumb enough to pay retail) vs. a rotofab which costs about the same. The claim is rotofab is 4 hp and 6 ft/lb > than Z/28 intake.

Which, to me, based on one single test, (one point a trend does not make) means the Z/28 intake works about as good as the other aftermarkets making my choice even easier.

Because what you DO get with the Z/28 intake that the others don't give you is an already-installed MAF and a DRY filter and a PERFECT fit. The MAF alone is around $75 or more retail and the worry about over-oiling a filter is a thing of the past.

No knock on rotofab, as they're intakes function as well as look good, too.

Why not both? Lol



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dontlift19 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.