04-28-2017, 01:31 AM | #113 |
Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lomita,CA
Posts: 806
|
IMHO with the sales performance thus far for the 6th generation Camaro we might see more of a departure from the current styling trend. I can also see them making more of a focus on the lower end of the pony car market as well in order to cover both bases.
Also considering how many previous BMW owners the 6th generation Camaro is getting maybe they can also focus on the high end interior and replace some of the hard plastics. |
04-28-2017, 02:28 AM | #114 |
Drives: Volvo XC60R, VW Eos, Fiat 500e Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 48
|
Z28?
Cosmetically, I think they'd get the most bang for the buck by enlarging the coupe's rear windows to the size used on the convertible, but this would be more costly than putting on a new front fascia.
__________________
Toys of the Past: Porsche Boxster S (987.2), Mazda Miata (gen I), Mazda Rx-7 (gen I), Porsche 914 2.0, Ford Mustang GT convertible, Ford Mustang Convertible, MGB (2x), VW Scirocco (gen I)
|
04-28-2017, 07:01 AM | #115 |
Drives: 1979 Z28 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 4
|
I've been wanting to get into a new Camaro since the 5th generation. Performance is above and beyond my current Camaro. However, visibility is just horrible. I was so hoping that the sixth generation would of improved it. However, it may of taken a step back. If they just raised the roof and improved outward visibility, I think the car would appeal to many more people. Also as a father, if the back seat was just 50% usable I could make a better case. The utility of the challenger has to be why it has done pretty well. I'm hoping GM is listening.
|
04-28-2017, 09:52 AM | #116 |
Drives: 2017 Summit White Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 36
|
As someone who is currently looking to buy a 2017, between the updated Mustang coming later this year and the apparent 2019 Camaro refresh, I can't help but think that the rest of the 2017s and the 2018 Camaros are going to be a little harder to sell. I do not keep up with the Mustang, but the 2018 looks to be loaded with the latest tech (an Audi-like dash and LED headlights) and has caught up to the Camaro with the adaptive suspension and dual mode exhaust (forgive me if those are available on non-GT350 Mustangs now, but they don't seem to be). It seems like these cars are heading into more luxury territory than ever before.
|
04-28-2017, 10:19 AM | #117 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 2SS/ RS INFERNO ORANGE L99 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Alliston Ontario Canada
Posts: 9,057
|
Now people are dictating what vids can be posted. And are concerned over alleged money that they wont be gettng anyway. Let the people that run the show be the show. I dont care to read your whining posts.
|
04-28-2017, 11:00 AM | #118 | |
Drives: HB 2SS Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 518
|
Quote:
|
|
04-28-2017, 11:18 AM | #119 | |
Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lomita,CA
Posts: 806
|
Quote:
|
|
04-28-2017, 11:22 AM | #120 |
Drives: 2020 LT1 Black Join Date: May 2013
Location: MO
Posts: 562
|
I see a Gen6 anytime I get on the highway in Missouri. Really it should have the LOWEST sales of the three since its still the most expensive and most performance-oriented rather than practical.
To me the biggest aeshtetic issue is the headlights and front fascia area. The hood bump needs to come back. If Chevy improves those two in the refresh I'll trade my '16 in. |
04-28-2017, 11:40 AM | #121 | ||
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
Quote:
If visibility is the only hold out for you, maybe you need to spend some time behind the wheel of a 5th or a 6th gen. I have never had an issue navigating traffic in my Camaros. Set the mirrors CORRECTLY (not everyone knows how to do this...here is a hint...if you can see the side if your car in the side mirrors, you are doing it wrong) and take a good test drive. Otherwise, if you have driven them, and you still can't stand the visibility, you'll be waiting and hoping for a change in the 7th gen. I'm a father also. The backseat in my 5th gen sucked. In the 6th gen it sucks just a bit more-so. That's just how it is. My point? If we want to Camaro to stay relative to its current size and weight without going the size and weight of the current Challenger, it will not improve. If you need the room, get a challenger, or get a four door sports sedan (Charger, SS, G8, etc.) Not trying to be a negative nancy, but I feel your hold outs are going to keep you out of this car indefinitely. Quote:
On a side note, I know everyone's opinions are different, so that's fine. But your two complaints on looks seem to be areas that most people are pretty happy with.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
||
04-28-2017, 02:15 PM | #122 | |
Drives: C8 Corvette Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 641
|
Quote:
or a car that looks like that: The facelift mustang seems to really get a lot of upgrades on the technical side. But I think they totally ruined the design of the car |
|
04-28-2017, 02:24 PM | #123 |
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
Both engines look like shit with those covers on there, but the Mustang has managed to improve on what was an already sexy design.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear |
04-28-2017, 03:17 PM | #124 | |
Drives: Volvo XC60R, VW Eos, Fiat 500e Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
I think killing the V6 is a mistake, and I just couldn't live with the Ecoboost. A buddy bought a V6 Mustang with an automatic. I had one as a rental when they first came out two years ago. It was disappointing. I'll be interested to see if metallurgical shocks tighten the handling gap between the Camaro and Mustang. The Camaro still offers a sunroof, although I think the Mustang would look good with a pano roof like on VWs or Mercedes. For some reason, even though similarly sized, the Camaro seems bigger than the Mustang. Maybe it just appears to be more blockish in opaque colors. (I'd like to see both of them downsized.)
__________________
Toys of the Past: Porsche Boxster S (987.2), Mazda Miata (gen I), Mazda Rx-7 (gen I), Porsche 914 2.0, Ford Mustang GT convertible, Ford Mustang Convertible, MGB (2x), VW Scirocco (gen I)
|
|
04-28-2017, 03:26 PM | #125 | |
Drives: HB 2SS Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 518
|
Quote:
|
|
04-28-2017, 03:27 PM | #126 |
|
Magnetorheological dampeners are just one component of a suspension system. They are not a miracle system that will even the playing field in track handling between the two. In fact if I remember correctly the difference in lap times between a non-MRC and MRC equipped SS was tiny. So no Ford giving GT owners the option of MagneRide will not make a difference. They need to make the PP much more aggressive to improve it. And honestly the chassis differences probably account for more of the handling gap, and that's not something that can really be corrected for a refresh.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|