11-21-2016, 04:36 PM | #85 |
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
That all depends on the tuner and what they're willing to risk. There can be zero or near zero drop off between runs, but may not be in the best long term interest of the owner/car. I'm sure the stock tune on the ZL1 is super conservative with pulling timing due to sensitivity to heat.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear |
11-21-2016, 04:36 PM | #86 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Altoona Iowa
Posts: 90
|
The ring time was done during manufacturers week.
__________________
2017 2SS Black NPP A8 - 422 HP 427 TQ
|
11-21-2016, 04:39 PM | #87 | |
FASTER!
Drives: Challenger Hellcat, 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,245
|
Quote:
|
|
11-21-2016, 04:41 PM | #88 | |
Dyno Show Queen LOL
Drives: 16 SS & 17 ZL1 Both Yellow Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,345
|
Quote:
After looking at the LT4 ZL1 it looks like they are using engine coolant for the blower vs stand alone tank/ reservoir and heat exchanger is this correct?
__________________
Kong Ported 2650, Crawford Racing Port Injection, Weapon X 112mm Adapter, NW112mm TB, Livernois Ported LT4 Heads, Lingenfelter GT32 stealth cam, Haltech Elite, and Carbon by Trufiber |
|
11-21-2016, 04:48 PM | #89 |
FASTER!
Drives: Challenger Hellcat, 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,245
|
The Magnuson box stock tunes for the Challengers have been excellent as well.
Good question on the coolant for the blower on the ZL1. |
11-21-2016, 06:03 PM | #90 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
I think this is cool to see the ZL1 on the dyno....er..."read" about the ZL1 on the dyno.
That said, I think some folks need to (wait for it...)....cool it. The OP clearly stated that this was not a well-documented, or prepped dynamometer session...Very very very few conclusions can be made with the data we see, aside from the fact that the car makes more than 500 rwhp. I've heard assurances from multiple big-shots on the Camaro team that heat will not be a problem with this car. This is not a new engine, and it's been mildly improved over time...let's look to the past... http://nineballgarage.com/dyno-teste...2014-viper-ta/ "...The Viper intake manifold actually got colder by 12F after the pulls. The Z06 was still impressive though, the supercharger housing (intake manifold) only increased 1 degree, after 4 consecutive pulls. Both good, in that regard. The IAT values were another story. The Viper increased in measured Air Intake Temp by 13F. The Z06 did much better, with both IAT1 (pre-blower) and IAT2 (post-blower) both reducing after the 4 consecutive runs. GM did a great job on the cooling efficiency on this blower..." |
11-21-2016, 06:18 PM | #91 |
Dyno Show Queen LOL
Drives: 16 SS & 17 ZL1 Both Yellow Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,345
|
E85 and upper pulley 637 hp first modded ZL1
__________________
Kong Ported 2650, Crawford Racing Port Injection, Weapon X 112mm Adapter, NW112mm TB, Livernois Ported LT4 Heads, Lingenfelter GT32 stealth cam, Haltech Elite, and Carbon by Trufiber |
12-03-2016, 04:12 AM | #92 |
Drives: New : 2017 SS 1LE Old: 2012 TTRS M6 Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Calgary/Vancouver
Posts: 810
|
and add about 80 lbs in weight... according to MT ( posted 3950 for auto)
__________________
.
. https://www.wheelwell.com/profile/56...ed9c3a/garage/ . . Project 1LE Wraith: http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=474068 |
12-03-2016, 10:59 AM | #93 | |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
Chevy says the auto adds 61 lbs over manual on the coupe... Yet only 35 lbs over manual in the convertible... Why such a big difference? nevertheless, while it's more weight...it's positioned as low and as centered as you can get. The best place to add mass...if you had a choice. |
|
12-03-2016, 11:32 AM | #94 |
Drives: 2017 ZL1 HBM, M6 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 264
|
Again, i'm new to a lot of this. How do they decide which gear to use on a dyno pull? Wouldn't gear selection make a difference on HP numbers? Do they just pick the one that is closest to 1-1?
|
12-03-2016, 04:02 PM | #95 |
Life's Short, Live Fast!
Drives: 2017 Hyper Blue A10 ZL1 Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: London, KY
Posts: 2,015
|
HP is derived from twisting force (torque) and RPM. The dyno reads both no matter what gear the car is in, but they are typically tested in drive (1:1) or as close as they can get to it.
__________________
Life's Short, Live Fast! https://youtu.be/rTUv2p4T7OA 10.94 at 128 mph, 11.13 at 127mph 870 DA, https://youtu.be/e_X_LcpFp50 11.19 at 127mph 1100 DA, https://youtu.be/OXQiCQdQuH4 11.40 at 125mph 1800 DA
https://youtu.be/uWba1qs8M6Q 11.52 at 123mph 3500 DA TZQPHG '17 ZL1 HBM|A10|Nav|PDR|CFW Hood|ZL1 Mats 12/26/2016 Ordered! 2/8/2017 Built!! 3/2/2017 Brought Home!!! |
12-03-2016, 07:12 PM | #96 |
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
A DynoJet does not read torque. It reads HP and calculates torque based off of that. If it read torque, you would see some crazy numbers when lower gears are used.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear |
12-03-2016, 07:13 PM | #97 | |
Drives: 2007.5 Duramax Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Houston
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
Having said that, my old low compression motor mad around 350whp and went 11.7 in my 3600lb camaro. My car should have made over 400whp but his dyno said otherwise. Good tune, numbers are not everything.
__________________
Built C6Z 600whp NA - SOLD
Built LSX 96SS - SOLD 68 Camaro - 6.2/10l80, self built and tuned. |
|
12-03-2016, 07:14 PM | #98 |
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
|
As close to 1:1 is usually best since it'll give the most accurate reading. Other gears may be either too short, or too long where the drums are being spun to near 200mph.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtqT56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|