10-09-2014, 06:02 AM | #72 |
Pills are for Pansies
Drives: 2023 2SS Red Hot Vert Camaro Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Citrus Springs FL
Posts: 1,296
|
Looks like the lower L & R insert/foglight areas should be a little less wide & just a bit taller
|
10-09-2014, 08:38 AM | #73 |
Drives: 2011 2LT IBM / SIM stripe 6M Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: STL
Posts: 863
|
Dud..............Reload !!!! I'm going to be extremely disappointed as a Gen1, Gen2, and Gen5 owner if the Gen6 is that close to a Gen5.
__________________
|
10-09-2014, 12:03 PM | #74 |
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
|
Any of you that don't like what you see so far, would you rather have this?
|
10-09-2014, 12:46 PM | #75 |
Drives: C8 Corvette Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 641
|
|
10-09-2014, 01:17 PM | #76 |
Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro 2LT / RS / Auto Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rutherford, NJ
Posts: 905
|
I dont see a real big difference from the 5th Gen
I thought it was going to look a bit smaller since it's based on a different and smaller Alpha Platform. The wheel base looks identical to the actual one. Maybe I'm mistaking. |
10-09-2014, 01:32 PM | #77 | |
Drives: 2008 Malibu V6 Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
Overall length is probably a bit less than the current car... maybe 4 or 5 inches. Of course, if you look at 4-5 inches on a ruler, you see that it's not a huge difference. So if 4 or 5 inches are gone, we wouldn't expect the new car to look dramatically smaller. We're not talking about going down to Scion/Subaru length or anything. |
|
10-09-2014, 03:02 PM | #78 |
Drives: Sedan Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 233
|
Color variants
|
10-09-2014, 03:11 PM | #79 |
Drives: 1992 Camaro Z28 Showcar Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 171
|
I have to admit, it appears you did outline the sketch really good (laid it in photoshop and you got it pretty darn on) however once in color on an actual "model", I'm not all that excited anymore.
The sketch looked so much more better than the "Actual" thing even tho it's placed the same. Now it looks nothing more to me than a 2014 with a different hood and a single LED strip.
__________________
1992 Camaro Z28. Blue/silver, Custom Blue/Silver Leather seats, Rebuilt Engine, Cammed, Headers, TT ][ Rims ...
NEW WWW.CAMAROSOURCE.CA Camarosource.ca FACEBOOK PAGE - EXCLUSIVE INFO On upcoming Camarosource.ca V5.0 and More!! |
10-09-2014, 03:20 PM | #80 | |
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
|
Quote:
I'm just feeding the trolls. |
|
10-09-2014, 03:28 PM | #81 | |
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
|
Quote:
From really early on, the official GM statement has been "Evolotionary, not revolutionary", to expect revolutionary is The fact that it does look very similar to the current car, and 99% of the people bought the car cuz it looks awesome, is a fact that I think GM took to heart and purposely did NOT stray far from current design. Is this going to please everyone? Hell no, but I'm impressed by the subtle changes, and looking forward to final reveal. |
|
10-09-2014, 03:32 PM | #82 |
Drives: 1992 Camaro Z28 Showcar Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 171
|
oh no I just mean the sketch itself looked so much more different but then you lay the sketch on an actual drawing like chazcron did and it looks so much more different than the sketch. Amazing how when you connect the dots and add color that it changes. :-)
The sketch looked like a lot of changing to the front, but then you lay it with paneling and it looks nearly identical to 5th gen's current front end in which the sketch didn't ;-)
__________________
1992 Camaro Z28. Blue/silver, Custom Blue/Silver Leather seats, Rebuilt Engine, Cammed, Headers, TT ][ Rims ...
NEW WWW.CAMAROSOURCE.CA Camarosource.ca FACEBOOK PAGE - EXCLUSIVE INFO On upcoming Camarosource.ca V5.0 and More!! |
10-09-2014, 04:38 PM | #83 |
Drives: Camaros................ Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seven Fields, PA (Pittsburgh)
Posts: 4,523
|
That's right - -I have a fleet of 'em (black suburbans)
__________________
|
10-09-2014, 06:16 PM | #84 |
Drives: Sedan Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 233
|
There are advantages and disadvantages to each approach. Rdesign's line work is stellar and clean. Mine is more akin to a colored clay. It shows the general light and shade, but lacks real reflections. This generation redesign was intended to be evo not revo, and to my eye, has a definite softening of all the cut lines, especially in the hips. Mine invokes the softness, whereas the line art reinforces sharpness. My lack of what will likely be fabulously designed headlight buckets turn sigs and fogs is detracting from the freshness of this redesign.
Short of monetary inducement and some insider info, I'm not likely to model this in 3D because there is not enough reference to the proportions with respect to the need for front rear side and top views. My experience modeling the 2015 Mustang reminds me that you only have to be a little wrong to be WAY off. I may decamo a rear view if RDesign does the line work for me. |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|