Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2020, 08:32 AM   #6987
TheRealJA105

 
TheRealJA105's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 C6Z06
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 1,577
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobbyBeefcake87 View Post
This. Pretty much what everyone with a brain who can reason was saying about VIR full. Run them at VIR grand and it would have probably been similar to what SP experienced.
Yep they had to cater to Ford. Yet, Mustang Fanboizz love to claim that Motor Trend and more so Randy are GM nut huggers.
TheRealJA105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 08:47 AM   #6988
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
Meanwhile, over at Cadillac....

SO, while we are rightfully ooohing and aaaahing over the new C8 release, and high-fiving each other over the Z06 rumors coming true, then there is Cadillac...

Cadillac had a great pair of cars in the CTS-V and ATS-V, but they also had a CTS VSport which wasn't as potent as the CTS-V, as you all probably already know. But now they are going to the CT4, CT5 and CT6. Okay. Then they released a CT6-V, with a Blackwing engine (4.2L V8 TT Hot-V config for 550 HP). So, the CT6-V version ended up with 100 less HP than the old CTS-V, which was disappointing. BUT, they were saying the new "V" is like the old "VSport", and there will be a more powerfull trim in the future perhaps with "Blackwing" in the name...

And, so now, they testing a new CT5 called the "CT5-V Blackwing", So does it have a new version of the Blackwing engine with more HP? NO. It's an LT4. Yes, you heard that right, the new CT5-V Blackwing, does not have a Blackwing engine, instead it has an LT4 that puts out the same 650 HP. Which is more HP than the Blackwing engine, but this is a trim level car named Blackwing.

Anyone confused yet?

You can get a "CT6-V" with a "Blackwing" engine, or you can get a "CT5-V Blackwing" without a "Blackwing" engine.

What a hot mess. Why does GM insist on naming conventions that defy any convention? Trying to figure out all the 1LT, LT1, 1LE, 2LT, etc. is harder than trying to figure out NSA's wifi password. Why does Cadillac insist on having it's own engines, then keep using the LT4? Why not share engines with Chevy, it's not like they aren't kick-a$$ engines that everyone would want in a luxury sedan/coupe.

https://www.motor1.com/news/410117/c...ckwing-650-hp/
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 09:09 AM   #6989
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 1,174
Cadillac has destroyed their naming conventions...will take another decade to recover. Whoever approved any of this should be unemployed.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1994 Camaro Z28 6M - Golen 383 HT
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 09:12 AM   #6990
IneedAZ


 
IneedAZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 & 2021 BMW M340i x Dr
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
Posts: 5,111
Did you see this ?
Model Year Engine Power (est.) Torque (est.) Likely Application
2021 LT2 6.2-liter 16-valve OHV 490-495 hp 465-470 lb-ft RHD Corvettes for export
2022 LT6 5.5-liter 32-valve DOHC 650 hp 600 lb-ft Corvette Z06
2023 LT2 6.2-liter 16-valve OHV hybrid 600 hp 500 lb-ft Corvette Grand Sport
2024 LT7 5.5-liter twin-turbo DOHC 850 hp 825 lb-ft Corvette ZR1
2025 LT7HP1 5.5-liter twin-turbo DOHC hybrid 1,000 hp 975 lb-ft Corvette Zora

https://www.motor1.com/news/414264/c...future-leaked/
__________________
Sold 2012 2LT RS 12.3@112 old setup

Sold 1967 Camaro Pro Street. Ran 10's mild BB on NOS.

2017 HyperBlue ZL1 A10 ** Born 3/17/17**Delivered 4/08/17
2020 Build: Mag2650, BTR Stage2, NW103, BG, 14% lower, 90mm upper, ARH 2" Long system w/no cats, SW Legend mufflers. **807hp/762tq on 93 gas** and **848hp/792tq on e47**

Sold 2018 (Go Mango) Dodge Charger Daytona 392 Daily Driver

Daily Driver 2021 BMW M340i Xdrive
IneedAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 09:33 AM   #6991
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
I don’t see an n/a 5.5l making 600 lb ft of torque. It would probably be quite a bit less.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 09:34 AM   #6992
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by IneedAZ View Post
Did you see this ?
Model Year Engine Power (est.) Torque (est.) Likely Application
2021 LT2 6.2-liter 16-valve OHV 490-495 hp 465-470 lb-ft RHD Corvettes for export
2022 LT6 5.5-liter 32-valve DOHC 650 hp 600 lb-ft Corvette Z06
2023 LT2 6.2-liter 16-valve OHV hybrid 600 hp 500 lb-ft Corvette Grand Sport
2024 LT7 5.5-liter twin-turbo DOHC 850 hp 825 lb-ft Corvette ZR1
2025 LT7HP1 5.5-liter twin-turbo DOHC hybrid 1,000 hp 975 lb-ft Corvette Zora

https://www.motor1.com/news/414264/c...future-leaked/
Yes, but I have some suspicions about accuracy. How would a 5.5L N/A motor make 600 lbft of torque? That's not going to happen. Plus, if you take 600 lbft of torque and multiply by 8000+ rpms (and divide by 5252 to get the correct units), you will get a LOT more than 650 HP.

You can estimate the RPMs that any engine make PEAK HP at by how close or far apart the HP and TQ numbers are. Equal numbers will give a peak near 6,000 RPMS. having 600 lbft and 650 HP suggests a peak HP RPMs of around 6500 or so, which would put redline at 7,000 RPMs. That's a very rough estimate of course, as there are many unknown factors, but any engine that revs to the moon will have MUCH less peak TQ than peak HP. So, the Z06 engine numbers seem to defy physics.
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 10:17 AM   #6993
Martinjlm
Retired fr GM + SP Global
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by IneedAZ View Post
Did you see this ?
Model Year Engine Power (est.) Torque (est.) Likely Application
2021 LT2 6.2-liter 16-valve OHV 490-495 hp 465-470 lb-ft RHD Corvettes for export
2022 LT6 5.5-liter 32-valve DOHC 650 hp 600 lb-ft Corvette Z06
2023 LT2 6.2-liter 16-valve OHV hybrid 600 hp 500 lb-ft Corvette Grand Sport
2024 LT7 5.5-liter twin-turbo DOHC 850 hp 825 lb-ft Corvette ZR1
2025 LT7HP1 5.5-liter twin-turbo DOHC hybrid 1,000 hp 975 lb-ft Corvette Zora

https://www.motor1.com/news/414264/c...future-leaked/
For me, this is almost chuckle-worthy. When I first started working at IHS-Markit, I intentionally did not take on the GM portfolio forecasting. I didn’t have an NDA or non-compete because I retired, as opposed to quitting to take another job, but I still wanted to maintain a 1-yr hands off of GM stuff just to maintain a position of plausible deniability (ie - I didn’t walk in with a basket full of secret documents). But I do have a fairly decent memory.

I took on GM after a year at IHS-M. The guy who had the deck before me had:

LT6 @ 650 hp / 600 lb-ft. I changed it to 600 / 500
LT7 @ 850 hp / 825 lb-ft. I changed it to 750 / 750, 750 / 922 for the hybrid
We agreed on the LT7 hybrid being a total system output of 1,000 / 975

I’m thinking Motor1 got their info from an old report of one of our forecasts. I made my changes about a year ago.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 10:24 AM   #6994
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinjlm View Post
For me, this is almost chuckle-worthy. When I first started working at IHS-Markit, I intentionally did not take on the GM portfolio forecasting. I didn’t have an NDA or non-compete because I retired, as opposed to quitting to take another job, but I still wanted to maintain a 1-yr hands off of GM stuff just to maintain a position of plausible deniability (ie - I didn’t walk in with a basket full of secret documents). But I do have a fairly decent memory.

I took on GM after a year at IHS-M. The guy who had the deck before me had:

LT6 @ 650 hp / 600 lb-ft. I changed it to 600 / 500
LT7 @ 850 hp / 825 lb-ft. I changed it to 750 / 750, 750 / 922 for the hybrid
We agreed on the LT7 hybrid being a total system output of 1,000 / 975

I’m thinking Motor1 got their info from an old report of one of our forecasts. I made my changes about a year ago.
Wow! Thanks again Jim, for your insight!

For the LT6 I was thinking more like 600/450, so your numbers suggest a lower peak HP RPM number than I though too. 8000 rather than 8,500? 500 lbft is a great number for 5.5L.

I'm editing this post regarding the LT7 because I missread Jim's statement. The LT7 should have peak RPMs around 6000 or so, which is good for a turbo, as many turbo engines peak early in RPM band.

Last edited by whiteboyblues2001; 04-23-2020 at 10:53 AM.
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 10:26 AM   #6995
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 1,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyblues2001 View Post
Wow! Thanks again Jim, for your insight!

So the LT7 will have a low peak HP RPM number, common in turbo applications. I'm thinking 5000-5500. For the LT6 I was thinking more like 600/450, so your numbers suggest a lower peak HP RPM number than I though too. 8000 rather than 8,500? 500 lbft is a great number for 5.5L.
8000 is plenty - even the Voodoo only offer 8250 briefly and only for so much time.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1994 Camaro Z28 6M - Golen 383 HT
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 10:32 AM   #6996
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-99SS View Post
8000 is plenty - even the Voodoo only offer 8250 briefly and only for so much time.
Trust me, I WANT less RPMs in the peak number. It means more torque, and more torque down low. I was just going with what I thought the most reliable rumors seemed to indicate. I don't have the industry expertise as Jim, of course...
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 10:56 AM   #6997
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 1,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyblues2001 View Post
Trust me, I WANT less RPMs in the peak number. It means more torque, and more torque down low. I was just going with what I thought the most reliable rumors seemed to indicate. I don't have the industry expertise as Jim, of course...
Agreed - somewhat. If the Z06 is an NA track weapon, I'm ok with high RPM as long as every review and old waxxer that buys one doesn't complain about it...they should have just bought a regular Stingray or wait for the ZR1/Zora.

As always - Jim with the insider edge to clarify the funky info - thanks!
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1994 Camaro Z28 6M - Golen 383 HT
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 10:57 AM   #6998
Martinjlm
Retired fr GM + SP Global
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyblues2001 View Post
Wow! Thanks again Jim, for your insight!

So the LT7 will have a low peak HP RPM number, common in turbo applications. I'm thinking 6000. For the LT6 I was thinking more like 600/450, so your numbers suggest a lower peak HP RPM number than I though too. 8000 rather than 8,500? 500 lbft is a great number for 5.5L.
Actually, it would be simpler for me to "show you my work" as they say in high school. I often use an online HP calculator and then based on what I know and what I assume, I plug and crank. These are my actual workups for LT6 and LT7 with some annotation. I'll fine tune them as I learn more details. For example, I assumed the engine square and backed into a 5.5L displacement. If it comes in under square or over square I'll have to tweak the bore and stroke to get the same displacement and see where that sends my hp estimates.
Attached Images
  
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 11:01 AM   #6999
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-99SS View Post
Agreed - somewhat. If the Z06 is an NA track weapon, I'm ok with high RPM as long as every review and old waxxer that buys one doesn't complain about it...they should have just bought a regular Stingray or wait for the ZR1/Zora.

As always - Jim with the insider edge to clarify the funky info - thanks!
Agreed completely. High RPM screamer is great for road course track car applications, and that has been part of Z06 history. But, my personal preference is a more balanced powerband engine. I totally geek out on the thought of a 5.5L N/A FPC Z06, but if I were in the market for something similar, I would probably wait for the ZR1 version. Or perhaps the Grand Sport, depending on how that turns out...
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2020, 01:41 PM   #7000
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 1,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboyblues2001 View Post
Agreed completely. High RPM screamer is great for road course track car applications, and that has been part of Z06 history. But, my personal preference is a more balanced powerband engine. I totally geek out on the thought of a 5.5L N/A FPC Z06, but if I were in the market for something similar, I would probably wait for the ZR1 version. Or perhaps the Grand Sport, depending on how that turns out...
Same - I actually want to put a H/C LS7 and TR6060 in my Grand Sport eventually. Love the LS7 RPM range AND torque. Just a great NA engine once the valve guides are addressed.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1994 Camaro Z28 6M - Golen 383 HT
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.