07-08-2016, 09:58 AM | #57 | |
Banned
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1LS M6 Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
1. Aluminum deep skirt block from the LFX mill. Check! 2. A forged steel crankshaft. Check! 3. High strength connecting rods with polymer coated pistons. Check! 4. Oil spray piston cooling. Check! 5. Variable Valve Timing. Same with LFX except for "Intermediate Park Feature". 7. 60 degree bank angle. Check! 9. Integrated exhaust manifolds inside the heads. Check! 10. DOHC 24 valve 3.6L displacement with direct injection. Check! It's more similar to the LFX than the LT1 is to the old LS3 or L99, especially since the LGX block is "based" off the LFX "mill". |
|
07-08-2016, 10:41 AM | #58 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
If you just want to argue semantics, then go for it. Far more things different in that small list than there are that are the same. http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=438242 |
|
07-08-2016, 02:39 PM | #59 | |
Drives: 2018 1LE SS "Silver Bullet" Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 619
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 06:21 PM | #60 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Topeka KS
Posts: 892
|
So what he is saying is...there IS a valve job in my future. This really sucks!
__________________
Life after retirement |
07-08-2016, 09:21 PM | #61 | |
Banned
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1LS M6 Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
It also has 11.5:1 compression ratio (just like the LFX) which neatly dove tails right into your argument about these engines not needing premium fuel to run the best. They do require premium to run at full capacity just like the old LFX. Sure, they'll run on 87 regular or whatever crap gas you can find, but the drivability will be lousy running on the low octane fuel tables and retarded spark timing and that's what this whole thing was about. The new LGX is no different than the LFX in this regard. |
|
07-08-2016, 09:21 PM | #62 | |
Big Samoan ina little car
Drives: 2016 camaro Join Date: May 2014
Location: Tofiga Island
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
You all are just panicking too much and making it far bigger of an issue than it really is... It was manageable on the LLT engine from 2010-2011, it was manageable on the LFX engine from 2012 to 2015. It'll be manageable on the LGX. just simply stay up on your maintainence
__________________
Don't sit around and watch everyone else live YOUR dreams...DO SUMPT'N
When I see posts asking "whats the best intake, exhaust, etc" .... the answer to that is like a grandfather telling his grandkids "if you put salt on a birds tail, it'll let you catch it" #ThinkAboutIt "Winning Tip: Don't take my (or anyone else's) word for it. GO TEST IT!" - Dennis Grant |
|
07-09-2016, 08:44 AM | #63 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
As for the 3.6 displacement here is the actual size of the engines. Almost a 100cc separate the two. LFX: 3564 LGX: 3649 Again, if you want to argue the semantics go ahead and continue. The engines share very little with each other and the actual parts are pretty different. |
|
07-10-2016, 05:27 PM | #64 | |
Banned
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1LS M6 Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: U.S.
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
Your original argument stating that REGULAR 87 is all these engines ever need and running a higher grade fuel is a complete waste of money, is incorrect. Both have high compression, 11.5:1, and probably similar ECU programming values regarding the high and low octane fuel tables. All of the major features and basic architecture between the two engines are practically the same. A few changes here and there to make interchange swaps a no go, but they are more similar than different except for the AFM feature and the very very slight bore increase. Sure, the parts won't interchange directly, but that doesn't mean the two engines are not based off one another. The article states, right there in the first sentence, that the LGX block was borrowed from the LFX mill. |
|
07-10-2016, 07:06 PM | #65 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Article also states what is all different. If you are insistent on them being the same, some be it.
Have a good one. |
07-10-2016, 11:36 PM | #66 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,494
|
Well, got about 300 hundred miles in on the car since installing the catch can. Still nothing showing up on the gauge tube.
I'll report back in 1000 more miles or sooner if i see anything. |
07-11-2016, 03:47 PM | #67 | |
Big Samoan ina little car
Drives: 2016 camaro Join Date: May 2014
Location: Tofiga Island
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
That's the side I noted oil from when I took off the tube to mess with the tb
__________________
Don't sit around and watch everyone else live YOUR dreams...DO SUMPT'N
When I see posts asking "whats the best intake, exhaust, etc" .... the answer to that is like a grandfather telling his grandkids "if you put salt on a birds tail, it'll let you catch it" #ThinkAboutIt "Winning Tip: Don't take my (or anyone else's) word for it. GO TEST IT!" - Dennis Grant |
|
07-11-2016, 04:53 PM | #68 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,494
|
Quote:
The tube to the right that you're talking about seems awefully like the intake tube to the air pump that feeds the cats on cold starts. I'd know soon for sure if the stupid service manual would go on sale. |
|
12-19-2016, 08:02 AM | #69 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2LT-217CI Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Wantagh, NY
Posts: 170
|
did you purchase the service manual
Quote:
thanks |
|
12-19-2016, 10:26 AM | #70 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,494
|
Service manual isn't on sale yet. helminc.com will sell it when it finally is released.
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|