03-23-2021, 07:39 PM | #57 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
|
03-23-2021, 08:36 PM | #58 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS, 2011 Corvette GS Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Erlanger, Kentucky 41018
Posts: 821
|
Quote:
Edelbrock makes a good kit. There are others as well. The centrifugal kits like a Procharger are also excellent. Either one are awesome. |
|
03-23-2021, 10:16 PM | #59 |
Drives: 2019 F150 Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 203
|
Decision is dependent on the use of the car.
Supercharger: Get stuck in stop and go traffic the supercharger drains the gas tank fast. Centri: No experience myself but from what I read ppl like them until the belt slips at higher boost levels. Turbos: Performance commuters choice in larger metropolitan areas |
03-23-2021, 11:18 PM | #60 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: '21 Wild Cherry ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 2,082
|
Quote:
I like you. |
|
03-24-2021, 02:14 AM | #61 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
If that was the case then my tank would always be empty considering how I drive to and from North Bergen and typically sit in traffic 3-4 times a week. I haven't noticed anything critical or anything at all in stop and go traffic. Maybe this was a thing in the old days. But with the tuning and tech we have at our disposal these days I'm gonna go ahead and say this shouldn't sway anyone away from a supercharger. In fact if you're sitting in traffic long enough to burn thru a tank of gas then the best thing to do is drive a commuter car or something more practical and fuel efficient to work.
|
03-24-2021, 07:12 AM | #62 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
|
03-24-2021, 07:48 AM | #63 | |
Drives: Turbo 6.2 Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
|
Quote:
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100 |
|
03-24-2021, 08:18 AM | #64 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
I got that. But again, it is not anything drastic. I haven't noticed any differences in my fuel consumption. It does run off the engine. However at idle it will be very minimal. And inching thru traffic won't be much of an issue. At least not enough to sway someone one way or another.
|
03-24-2021, 09:18 AM | #65 | |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,839
|
Quote:
Second, with Boost, Ethanol is worth 70-100whp over 93 octane depending on the FI application. Ethanol + Meth his worth 120whp +. So just octane and fueling alone can make up the difference H/C gains on 93. Third, I could take a stock LT4, 2650 swap it, do FIC +30 injectors, LPE DI pump, Cordes low side, run E60 and make more power more consistently then a H/C 2.3 stock blower build on 93. That is why I don't believe you need a cam first thing even on a LT4 engine. A H/C LT4 with stock blower is very octane limited on 93. The money it cost to do H/C would buy the fuel system and likely have money left over.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
|
03-24-2021, 10:04 AM | #66 |
BAMF SS
|
Boost sucks... Stay N/A
__________________
2016 1SS A8: FBO + Circle D + P1X + Meth + Tuned by Pray Performance
Stock Longblock 800 SAE rwhp. 9.4 @ 145 mph. |
03-24-2021, 10:19 AM | #67 |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,839
|
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
03-24-2021, 10:56 AM | #68 |
Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,622
|
Agreed, which is why I started by suggesting that he would be well advised to stay the naturally aspirated, direct injection, LT1 engine design and do a custom valve train, heads, headers, and hi-flows, and gain close to 30% in hp.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10.
LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct. 1116/967. 1.35/9.25/151 at 3500 ft. 15" conversion/MT ET Street R 325/50R15. Last edited by JSH; 03-24-2021 at 11:37 AM. |
03-24-2021, 10:57 AM | #69 |
Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,622
|
Since I own one, typing "LT4" has become habit. Also, I've never in any post recommended changing the short block (rotating assembly) in any way.
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10.
LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct. 1116/967. 1.35/9.25/151 at 3500 ft. 15" conversion/MT ET Street R 325/50R15. |
03-24-2021, 11:36 AM | #70 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS, 2011 Corvette GS Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Erlanger, Kentucky 41018
Posts: 821
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Tags |
boost, pro charger, speed, super charger, turbo charger |
|
|