|
|
#43 | |
|
Long hauler
|
I still remember the 2019 refresh ‘reveal’ that they had CBS do. I struggle to even find a good quality reveal video now…
__________________
2022 2SS 1LE - Window Sticker - Cold Air Inductions Elite Carbon CAI
2016 1LT v6 - Totaled Happiness: Infinite |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2ss 6mt Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: dallas
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
The camaro has no more or less visibility than my trans am, supra, 3000gt, gto. Kids that went from their moms old camry to a camaro definitely had a big change to adjust to but nothing out of the ordinary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
![]() Drives: 2023 Camaro RS Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 12
|
Not just amaro
Quote:
With Camaro, it hurts us because it hit closer to home. I bought mine when I did because it was my last chance after a number of Mustangs over the decades. But it was not because the Camaro was state of the art. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | ||
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 6,197
|
Quote:
Quote:
That said, I’d much rather do what I do now lmao. That sports car daily stuff is not for old-version of me haha
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2021 Camaro LT1 Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Tampa FL area
Posts: 846
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,301
|
lol, prices of everything are too high. And Mach E prices are even higher
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,301
|
Quote:
For starters your Trans Am has a lower belt line without the Camaro slammed roof. It’s better (and I’ve driven both over the years). Supra and and the longgggg gone 3000gt? GM considered those Corvette competitors for most tif the time. And 3000gt? Gone. Supra? Cancelled. And lastly, the Mustang is just wayyyy better. And if all you want is a sporty coupe and you aren’t willing to make the trade offs V8 buyers are, you’ll probably buy the Mustang. Otherwise, I need someone to explain, if it wasn’t visibility, trunk space and rear seat room why the better looking and wayyyy better performing Camaro is gone and you can still get a Mustang. And DONT say advertising as the Mustang advertised as much (or little) as the Camaro.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2ss 6mt Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: dallas
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
Try and make that make sense. Like i said dumb kids that just came from a sedan have problems, no one that knows how to adjust a seat and use mirrors will have problems any more than any other coupe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 SS A8 Hyper Blue/White Stripes Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Arlington, TN.
Posts: 1,883
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 Camaro 2SS Hyper Blue
2011 Camaro 2SS 2004 Corvette CE SOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
![]() Drives: 2023 Camaro 1SS 1LE 6MT Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 552
|
Yeah I'm not getting it either..
Visibility between the 4th and the 6th gen isn't that drastic. The rear window of my 4th gen TA was horrible to see out of, it cuts off the top and the bottom of your view. When you factor in the 6th gen has a backup camera, it's way easier to back up with the 6th gen. The higher side windows does make it slightly harder to see out the side/rear 3/4 I suppose, but the situation isn't drastically improved when hopping in the 4th gen. Storage, the 6th gen has more of it, hands down. The smaller trunk opening could be a pain, sure, but the actual space in there is pretty large. In the 4th gen, back seats were just as useless, and while it has a hatch, you had one small deep well in the back (which you lost if you took the T-Tops off). There was a tiny space between the well and the rear seat which was useless for basically anything, and then you had the rear seats. You can fit larger more awkward things in the 4th gen because of the hatch. I took home a 6' step ladder in it which I know I couldn't do in the 6th gen. If I had to go on a trip and pack a bunch of stuff though, 6th gen hands down is better. Yes you can put a drink in the door pocket of a 4th gen, but you lost the cup holder in the center console (I will laugh in your face if you try to tell me the 1/2" deep "cup holder" is usable for anything but a bit of change). |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2021 Camaro LT1 Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Tampa FL area
Posts: 846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
![]() Drives: 2020 Camaro LT1 Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Kansas City Metro
Posts: 642
|
I think Advertising is the big one. Dodge put out amazing ads for their cars everywhere during the time the Camaro was around and still do now. They also kept upping the Horsepower over time as well. Chevy did nothing in advertisement and didn't participate in the 700+ hp car building like Ford and Dodge did. Dodge successfully sold a car on a platform that was around since Bush was president and put hellcats in it outselling both the Mustang and the Camaro until the end of that generation a year or two ago.
As far as visibility goes I can tell you there are other cars on the market with the same or worse visibility including peoples dream cars I hear talked about while bashing the Camaro that has the same visibility. Putting the con on the Camaro though probably hurt it but not as much as what I said above. I personally do not think the visibility in the Camaro is bad and I have had the car for over five years now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
![]() Drives: 22 SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: MD
Posts: 45
|
For me the Camaro cockpit is too tight and the seating position is Corvettish, too low, but I think that is the way the Camaro has always been, more of a down low recliner like driving position. I like the S650 and S550 seating position better, it is more upright.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Retired fr GM + SP Global
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 5,945
|
Quote:
One week I had two Mustang press cars back to back. First was a Bullitt. Second was a GT350. I couldn't wait to give back the keys to the Bullitt. Seating position was way too high and accentuated the cars suspect handling. It felt like sitting on top of the car. If you tossed the car around, it tossed you twice as hard. And the MT82 had sloppy, long throws with almost no detent feel. Hated that transmission. The Shelby had a lower seating position and Recaro's that hugged you tight. And the Tremec was TIGHT!. Every shift was "Snick! Snick! Snick! I begged for more time with that car. Didn't get it.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|