Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2015, 10:13 AM   #43
Jeb114

 
Jeb114's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 300
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 968
Thank you in all your responses the topic was more of a Let's think about this, instead of shooting from the hip. Enjoyed reading. You all had great points. I think the ZL1 is the best road car ever built. I have owed a SRT 392 Challenger, A GT 500 Mustang. They do not handle the Highway as good as the ZL1. But I am going to order a GT 350 because the change in the car intrigues me.(The ZL1 will stay in the garage and will not be traded)
Jeb114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 10:56 AM   #44
DenverTaco07


 
DenverTaco07's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb114 View Post
Thank you in all your responses the topic was more of a Let's think about this, instead of shooting from the hip. Enjoyed reading. You all had great points. I think the ZL1 is the best road car ever built. I have owed a SRT 392 Challenger, A GT 500 Mustang. They do not handle the Highway as good as the ZL1. But I am going to order a GT 350 because the change in the car intrigues me.(The ZL1 will stay in the garage and will not be traded)
He's alive!!!

Good things come to those who wait - I like the GT350, but now that i've seen what I believe is the ZL1, i'm liking ZL1 and very excited to see how it turns out, i have no doubt the ZL1 will be the better car.

The GT350 is awesome, I think the Voodoo will be great, hope there isn't' too much vibration on it though.
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod
DenverTaco07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 11:51 AM   #45
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
If anyone recalls, I listed what was needed in my opinion to make the Gen 6 a huge success.

GM hit it on every count but 1, styling.

They elected to go for a solid single rather than swing away. Of course you can win a game with a single as well. It's just nearly as dramatic.

This car is also the 2021 Camaro folks and it looks too much like a rendition of the car I drove to California way back in December 2008.

JMO
...and styling is KING....(or very close to it lol) over all else, even performance. Why in the world, would the more expensive, heavier, slightly slower car (5th gen Camaro) outsell the 2011 - 2014 Mustang....except that people actually liked the styling??? Haters will say the car looks terrible, or it is "cartoonish" but I'll be damned...it sold very well! So people liked it...period, end of story.

So we have to hope that people like the new styling as well and it is enough to carry the car forward. I think once we start seeing these cars in person, and on the road the difference will be more apparent than they are coming across in photos. The new Mustang for instance has a nice wide and low profile that really looks great and grabs your attention (although I still think the car looks awkward from certain angles). Hopefully 6th gen Camaro will touch on that same page, although the 5th gen was already closer to this than say the 5th gen Mustang was.

A refresh is only going to do so much...front and rear-end changes, but that side profile is going to remain the same throughout its run.

Again going back to my previous comments, aside from styling (in some opinions), they did everything they needed to do and then some.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 12:02 PM   #46
newb

 
newb's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
...and styling is KING....(or very close to it lol) over all else, even performance. Why in the world, would the more expensive, heavier, slightly slower car (5th gen Camaro) outsell the 2011 - 2014 Mustang....except that people actually liked the styling??? Haters will say the car looks terrible, or it is "cartoonish" but I'll be damned...it sold very well! So people liked it...period, end of story.

So we have to hope that people like the new styling as well and it is enough to carry the car forward. I think once we start seeing these cars in person, and on the road the difference will be more apparent than they are coming across in photos. The new Mustang for instance has a nice wide and low profile that really looks great and grabs your attention (although I still think the car looks awkward from certain angles). Hopefully 6th gen Camaro will touch on that same page, although the 5th gen was already closer to this than say the 5th gen Mustang was.

A refresh is only going to do so much...front and rear-end changes, but that side profile is going to remain the same throughout its run.

Again going back to my previous comments, aside from styling (in some opinions), they did everything they needed to do and then some.
I understand that the side profile is what it is as far as roofline. But the only complaint I have really heard is the rear end (tails and bumper) and front fascia. So they can be changed pretty drastically.
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.

Delivered 21 Jan 2013

newb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 12:49 PM   #47
Dfault

 
Dfault's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 988
I don't think a bunch of you gents know how car buying works. It's designed to be this way for a reason. A fully loaded Camaro will cost almost what a base Vette will cost, however once a person becomes committed to buying a vette because it costs a little more than the Camaro, that's when the sales person will be able to go in and see if they can push the sale and get some options thrown in. Besides, it's only a bit more than the Camaro and you get to have a corvette. Before you know it, that $55k Corvette ended up being $70k.
Dfault is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 01:30 PM   #48
Enders
 
Drives: 2015 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 17
I only agree with you on the design aspect, mechanically I think the car is great (LT1 with the the Tremec, options for NPP and MRC that you can't even get on a Mustang).

The front looks great (aside from a few of the unnecessary lines on the hood) so they clearly spent a majority of their time on that, while the the rear got left behind and barely changed at all. For some that may not be a problem, but for me it is because I actually preferred the initial quad tail lights the 5th gen had. Then they had the mid-cycle refresh which was a step backwards.

Again though, will have to see it in person to truly gauge how I feel about it. Needs to hit the lots already!
Enders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 01:47 PM   #49
Bassment
 
Drives: 2016 Red Hot 2SS M6
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ontario
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dfault View Post
I don't think a bunch of you gents know how car buying works. It's designed to be this way for a reason. A fully loaded Camaro will cost almost what a base Vette will cost, however once a person becomes committed to buying a vette because it costs a little more than the Camaro, that's when the sales person will be able to go in and see if they can push the sale and get some options thrown in. Besides, it's only a bit more than the Camaro and you get to have a corvette. Before you know it, that $55k Corvette ended up being $70k.
That's pretty much how I ended up ordering a 2SS. I convinced myself up from a $20k car to a base $30k camaro to a $50k camaro
Bassment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 02:48 PM   #50
LesserO2Evils
GM repeat offender...
 
Drives: 16 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Grandview, Texas
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by kain279 View Post
This C5/C6 talk is not making sense. The C5 looked more like the C4 than the C6......the C6 got rid of the flip up headlights and had sharp, angular edges/corners everywhere the C5 was soft or rounded.
Yeah.. Idk that was a good analogy. Or even a good MEMORY. The C6 was BLASTED for the DIFFERENCES from the C5. Non popups, tail lights, etc... The C6 was quite different from the C5 and caught a ton if flack bc of it.
__________________
'16 2SS, Summit White. A8. MRC. NPP.
Ordered:09/03/15. Received 12/22/15

INCOMING: ‘22 ZL1, Satin Steel. A10. PDR.
Ordered: 03/02/22.
LesserO2Evils is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 03:08 PM   #51
laborsmith


 
Drives: 1969 Corvair, 2018 Camaro T4 RS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit Metropolitan Area
Posts: 2,881
Must be my memory going. I do recall the controversy about abandoning the pop up headlamps.

Laborsmith
laborsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 03:48 PM   #52
Dr. Love2
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2016 SS;2010 Camaro SS/RS; 2015 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Gallatin
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dfault View Post
I for one am glad that they kept the iconic look of the Camaro. Think about it, up until the 4th gen you could see one coming down the road and say, "LOOK A CAMARO" and then the 4th gen happened and sales went down hill. If they would have completely done a redesign and got rid of the iconic look of the Camaro, sales probably wouldn't be as good as I think they're going to be or as good as the 5th gen was. Here is another question I am thinking about. People bought the 5th gen because it was a new Camaro to many of the people out there. Now that many people have the current 5th gen, how many of those people are really going to be upgrading to a new camaro come the release of the 6th gen?

I am keeping my AMB 5th Gen and getting a new Hyper Blue 6th. I think the styling of the exterior is nice but not ultimately that huge of a difference. The thing that attracts me to the 6th is that it is pretty much the same as a Corvette if you get the SS option. I really like all of the new technology in my 'vette, so now I can have it in my new Camaro. If I weren't so sentimentally attached to my 5th gen, I might trade up. I figure a lot of 5th gen people who bought early on will trade up, though. The 6th gen is a nice improvement on what they already love. Why not?

Last edited by Dr. Love2; 09-18-2015 at 04:04 PM.
Dr. Love2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 03:53 PM   #53
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dfault View Post
I don't think a bunch of you gents know how car buying works. It's designed to be this way for a reason. A fully loaded Camaro will cost almost what a base Vette will cost, however once a person becomes committed to buying a vette because it costs a little more than the Camaro, that's when the sales person will be able to go in and see if they can push the sale and get some options thrown in. Besides, it's only a bit more than the Camaro and you get to have a corvette. Before you know it, that $55k Corvette ended up being $70k.
Don't disagree, but I have to say.

If you are someone considering a 45K 2SS (so lets say automatic transmission and one or two other things also) and you let yourself be talked into a 70K Corvette you are either:

1) Plenty wealthy and it doesn't matter
2) An idiot with no financial responsibility.

Those that actually care about the cost of a 2SS with a few options and a griping about cost aren't going to be moving into a Corvette, especially one with options.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 04:00 PM   #54
Dr. Love2
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2016 SS;2010 Camaro SS/RS; 2015 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Gallatin
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
Don't disagree, but I have to say.

If you are someone considering a 45K 2SS (so lets say automatic transmission and one or two other things also) and you let yourself be talked into a 70K Corvette you are either:

1) Plenty wealthy and it doesn't matter
2) An idiot with no financial responsibility.

Those that actually care about the cost of a 2SS with a few options and a griping about cost aren't going to be moving into a Corvette, especially one with options.
My Z06 was $106,000. A lot of the same options that are on it are on the new SS. That is a huge value. People who are griping about the price need to really get out there and see how much Corvettes with these options really costs. To get a fully decked out track ready car for mid 40s is nothing to sneeze at, especially with the magnetic ride, track modes, and optional six piston front brakes.
Dr. Love2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 04:02 PM   #55
wakespeak

 
wakespeak's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,381
Whatever you think of the Gen6 styling, its clearly a break with being a muscle car. I think that may be what the OP is feeling.
__________________
2020 ZL1 1LE [Moroso SC Expansion Tank, otherwise stock]
wakespeak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2015, 04:10 PM   #56
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakespeak View Post
Whatever you think of the Gen6 styling, its clearly a break with being a muscle car. I think that may be what the OP is feeling.

Sorry the 5th gen was no more a muscle car than the 6th gen is. Both are 2+2 and have the largest displacement engine. Not even going to get into the muscle/pony car argument because the history is plain enough to see.

In reality, only the Challenger is closest to being a muscle car by the original definition, but then of course the Challenger was a pony car too.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.