Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Griffin Motorsports


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2015, 09:06 PM   #43
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2023 Expedition
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,375
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503 View Post
Maybe those who want T-Tops or Targa Tops should just join the All Wheel Drive band-wagon....Just lobby for AWD, but only if T-Tops are included.
Don't forget DCT.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation
2023 Ford Expedition SSV (State-Issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2015, 09:27 PM   #44
laborsmith


 
Drives: 1969 Corvair, 2018 Camaro T4 RS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit Metropolitan Area
Posts: 2,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Does this even exist?
None I can think of, likely for the reasons Number 3 offers.

Personally, I did not like T-tops when I had my '96 Camaro, as they were cumbersome and not fun to remove from or return to the roof. But I do not design or engineer cars, Ijust buy and do my best to drive the living daylights out of them.

Laborsmith
laborsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2015, 09:55 PM   #45
FINALLYSATISFIED
Est.1775
 
FINALLYSATISFIED's Avatar
 
Drives: '15 Challenger Hellcat (sold)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,499
Glass roof. Mmmm.
FINALLYSATISFIED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 08:26 AM   #46
RealG
 
RealG's Avatar
 
Drives: 2024 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
You are correct. Given enough capitl, enough piec price increase and enough time, I can do it.

But please everyone that wants T-tops start list everything you want. Bolt in ok? Probably not. 60 pounds per panel? Also likely a no.

So if you want them easy to use, easy to store, you will add so much cost younwouldnt want them.

Would you pay $10,000 for them? Better have thousands say yes for the business case to work.

So yes, I've run the test and yes I've engineered the solution to get cars to pass this test. T-tops would be very nearly impossible to productionize at anywhere near an affordable cost.
I would personally not order them again at this point. However I've had plenty of T-top Trans Ams and Camaros over the years and most people,myself included loved them. I think the engineers can make it work cost-effectively if demand was present which I don't think it is. But it's definitely an interesting concept and would separate the Camaro from other sports cars.
RealG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 08:42 AM   #47
chrisvr6


 
Drives: suzuki
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: swiss
Posts: 2,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradl1982 View Post
Needs pop-up headlights too!!
no
Attached Images
 
chrisvr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2015, 10:02 AM   #48
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealG View Post
I would personally not order them again at this point. However I've had plenty of T-top Trans Ams and Camaros over the years and most people,myself included loved them. I think the engineers can make it work cost-effectively if demand was present which I don't think it is. But it's definitely an interesting concept and would separate the Camaro from other sports cars.
The cost effective solution to having an open air feeling in a coupe body is a sunroof, and there is substantial demand for it.

And yes, I'm sure that its also possible to make it reasonably cost effective. Add a whole bunch of steel and you can make just about any shape incredibly strong. The removable panels would be very difficult for a single person to manoeuvre, and you'd be adding an awful lot of weight in the rest of the roof which is about the worst possible place to add weight in a performance car. In order to amortize the development cost as much as possible (and minimize tooling cost), every single coupe would need to be built with the t-top roof structure. That would help keep cost to a minimum. But now you've got a car that won't handle as well, won't accelerate as quickly, takes a bit of a hit in fuel economy compared, makes the car more expensive, and overall makes the car worse ... all so that some can have t-tops.

This is why people like Number 3 and I say that its impossible to do a T-top Camaro. Its going to be either too expensive, or create too many compromises (or probably a bit of both), to be a viable product.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2015, 07:43 AM   #49
joes407


 
joes407's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1m6 red hot #569
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: florida
Posts: 2,422
Both my 91 and 92 camaros had ttops. On the 91 they were tinted glass and looked great but roasted youre ass when in the sun, my 92 had plexiglass ttops that got heat stress cracks all through them but they stayed cooler than the glass but the glass ones looked better and held up better. None of them leaked but they did creak a bit
joes407 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2015, 08:28 AM   #50
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,310
There is a reason no OEM offers T-tops today, at least none that I'm aware of.

It is much more challenging.

That being said, I believe convertibles now or very soon will have to pass the side pole impact test. I've posted it many times so if you haven't seen it, google it.

Look up roof strength. A removable panel with latches would have to support what is I think 3x the vehicle weight. (Used to be 1.5 check me on the 3)

The most likely path to T-tops would be to petition NHTSA for a change to the classification as a coupe.

But also keep in mind the reason for T-tops is ease of removal and ease of storage. In a bigger car a targa panel is harder to remove and in most cases can't be stored. Keep in mind great care is taken with the Corvette to insure the hatch opening is sized to accommodate the roof panel.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 04:12 AM   #51
songsj

 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS Summit White
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: MPLS
Posts: 798
I am surprised at all the negative opinions about the t-tops. If you check I think almost half of the gen 4 Camaros and Firebirds were t-tops. I would call that demand. I loved them and think the substitute sun/moonroof is kind of a joke. My current Gen 5 has the moonroof and each time I open it i feel like what's the point. Also at the time I think the Camaro and Firebird [maybe the Corvette] were about the only cars with t-tops. Made them unique. Now almost every car offers a moon roof. Nothing unique about that. I had mine open the other day and a guy pulls up next to me with a rusted out Grand Prix with the moonroof open, Gee I really felt special.
songsj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 06:46 AM   #52
bobby97z
 
Drives: 06 Civic (not for long) Retired 97z
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ga
Posts: 10
I agree about a moonroof. My wife's car has one and it's ok, just seems pointless to me. It's amazing the tech, design, and performance that's here and coming to new cars. Gm really needs to continue to differentiate itself from other makers, and it has! T tops would be my wish list. Just pointless with moonroof IMO.
bobby97z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 07:51 AM   #53
Raven87
C'mon- really?
 
Raven87's Avatar
 
Drives: Looking for a ZL1
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nortwestern Ohio
Posts: 1,966
Given the small trunk opening of the Gen 6 Camaro, it might be tough getting a single T-Top panel in there, much less two. Worse yet, a Targa.

I had a couple of cars back in the '80s with T-Tops and always had issues with either leaks, wind noise, etc. Just my two cents but I wouldn't take a T-Top car if it was given to me. I know technology and seals, etc are better today but man, I will NEVER own a t-top car again.
__________________
Steve
2018 Camaro 2SS 1LE Black #3805 - SOLD
Raven87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2015, 01:09 PM   #54
KarFan
 
KarFan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 SGM Camaro 2SS 1LE 6M
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven87 View Post
Given the small trunk opening of the Gen 6 Camaro, it might be tough getting a single T-Top panel in there, much less two. Worse yet, a Targa.
This. Another reason why T-tops or Targa wasn't offered in the 5th among the many reasons is storage. Hatchback 3rd, 4th Gens and Corvettes have broad openings for proper storage. The 5th and 6th Gen Camaro doesn't have this and won't have t-tops.
KarFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 03:24 AM   #55
songsj

 
Drives: 2015 2SS/RS Summit White
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: MPLS
Posts: 798
All of the technology that went into these cars and no one could figure out how to put 2 vinyl bags with a zipper on them and one strap to hold them down in the back. You can come up with 25 reasons/excuses to not have t-tops if you want, and almost as may to have them if you want. For whatever reason/reasons, GM just did not want to offer them in these 2 generations.
songsj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2015, 05:42 AM   #56
classicrockr
Pills are for Pansies
 
classicrockr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 2SS Red Hot Vert Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Citrus Springs FL
Posts: 1,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by songsj View Post
All of the technology that went into these cars and no one could figure out how to put 2 vinyl bags with a zipper on them and one strap to hold them down in the back. You can come up with 25 reasons/excuses to not have t-tops if you want, and almost as may to have them if you want. For whatever reason/reasons, GM just did not want to offer them in these 2 generations.
"Whatever reasons"? have you NOT seen all the posts from past t-top owners? they are NOTORIOUS for leaking! Gee, THAT seems like a pretty GREAT reason not to put them on a car!
classicrockr is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.