![]() |
#43 |
376 cubic inches of fun
|
I like the Gen 2, but I think GM designers can do a much better jop than the OP pictures.
Imitating the Gen 2 body style would help them package a smaller AND LIGHTER car. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 5.7L Tundra Double-Cab X-SP Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 2,031
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Account Suspended
Drives: Green Dream Machine Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Waterloo, IA AUN
Posts: 296
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 173
|
![]()
__________________
2010 2SS SIM LS3, GM Ground Effects, Cherrybomb Extreme Axle-Back |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Bumblebee1961
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS Transformers Edition Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Czar, Alberta
Posts: 1,118
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Oldbie that nobody knows
|
I doubt this is going to happen since the retro movement is supposedly on its way out. Just like how the 5th gen was a response to the Mustang's success, the 6th gen will be a response to whatever path Ford takes with the 2015 'Stang.
I'm gonna miss the retro movement if it really does fade away, lol. I'd much rather own a classic car than a new one because they looked so much better to me. Maybe this is a calling that I should finally go and, well, get a classic! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
The LS3 is on its way out and will be replaced by the LT1. Please GM, do not make it look like that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Wind Rider
Drives: ZL1 19 White; Jeep 5.7 GC 15 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muscat
Posts: 2,059
|
Hell NO
__________________
Im not Gray any more !!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Est.1775
Drives: '15 Challenger Hellcat (sold) Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,502
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2002 Z/28,1968 Chevelle convert. Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Phila.,PA
Posts: 1,141
|
I like it, i really do...Would buy one in a Heart Beat...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Camaro's, always have, always will. Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Home of the brave
Posts: 4,851
|
....I personally would not buy any stock in that theory. Look at the C7 'Vette, and the rebirth of the Stingray name for example. I am not sure anyone could argue there are any styling clues in association with the name, it is much farther a design forward, rather than anything backward incorporating any retro design. Retro is passe.
__________________
In Scott We Trust...all others must show proof.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
![]() Drives: '13 ZL1 IOM M6 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: South Carolina Swamps y'all
Posts: 211
|
The '70-style ROCKS!
But not a fan of the 'rendition'...hopefully, the artist was having a bad-day ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Anniversary Edition Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 36
|
I think it looks pretty sharp. As for any tweeking, would be interesting.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
![]() Drives: Red Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Temecula
Posts: 296
|
The front doesnt look right... make the beak more pointy, add fog lights, get rid of the bottom vent, add some halos... i bet it would look a lot better.
Posted from Camaro5.com App for Android |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|