|
|
#407 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,991
|
Quote:
I figure replacing the trans with the brakes should keep the price about the same.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#408 | |
![]() Drives: 2018 Colorado ZR2 Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 557
|
Quote:
Either way, I'm sure the 1LE will be a good value package. |
|
|
|
|
|
#409 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,991
|
Quote:
I'm not sure if the PDR will be included or not.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#410 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Chevy Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 794
|
Quote:
Those wheels look so good Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#411 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 771
|
Just watched Jay Leno's video about his GT350R... and the chief engineer at Ford thinks MRC has significant benefits on the track, so does Ferrari and Porsche apparently. I still haven't heard a reasonable explanation of why a lot of you seem to think it doesn't. The only reason not to opt for it is custom tuning or a dedicated (as in no street use at all) track car where rules don't allow MRC.
Also, does anyone know if 1LE parts will be sold separately (or as a package) by GM performance? The gen5 1LE added a lot of cool upgrades; going as far as transmission and ZL1 suspension components... |
|
|
|
|
#412 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 ZL1 6M, Silverado High Country Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 2,101
|
I can't wait till they release the details on the 1LE. I'm thinking recaros will be part of the package for sure and a square tire setup and a 3.91 rear end. They will Probably bring back the black hood as well. I'm not ruling out MRC either. My guess will be around $4500 for the package.
__________________
Previous Camaro's - 2002 Z28 6 spd manual, T tops, Sebring Silver - 2010 2SS 6 spd manual, Cyber Gray Metallic
Current Vehicles - 2018 ZL1 Red Hot 6 spd manual, Carbon Hood, Sunroof 2019 Silverado High Country, Daily Driver |
|
|
|
|
#413 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 16 Camaro, 11 Stryker, 00 Explorer Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,214
|
Quote:
__________________
NGM, 2SS, 6MT, NPP, MRC, Nav, Kalahari, Grey Wheels
1100 12/14/2015 3000 1/8/2016 (TPW 2/1) 3800 2/1/2016 5000 3/5/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
#414 | ||
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Quote:
As for Ferrari, they added MRC to satisfy the people who wanted a better ride, but not alienate those who want a good track set up. Ferraris track based cars do not have MRC. GMC added MRC to their full size trucks as an option too...you think that's for track based handling? It's for the ride improvement. I'm not knocking MRC, but so many don't understand it fully. As far and it's features and benefits...for a daily driver it's fantastic, for a track day car there can be better choices. Quote:
They have in the past, so I could see it happening, but not for at least a year or so after release. It took a few years with the 5th gen before the parts were sold as a package if I recall. Some stuff is only available if you buy the car though... |
||
|
|
|
|
#415 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,045
|
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't almost all of the reviews praise the MRC for allowing the ZL1 to handle so well??? Or were they just praising it bc it was so much better than the GT500 set up lol
EDIT: NVM just pulled up the article all the suspension praise was on the street with the MRC, track stuff was mostly chassis |
|
|
|
|
#416 |
![]() Drives: Future Gen 6 owner Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Fresno, Ca
Posts: 51
|
__________________
Saving for a 6th gen SS/1LE
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#417 | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
Quote:
The ZL1/GT500 review debacle has kind of faded from the Camaro collective memory, it seems. http://www.motortrend.com/news/2012-...-shelby-gt500/ Here MT praises the MRC for it's comfort and performance prowess.. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#418 | |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#419 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 771
|
Quote:
They didn't have to put MRC on the R if it didn't add to track performance, especially since it's such a track oriented car (even has no rear seats). Same with other manufacturers. I read... but all those points come down to tuning. If MRC actually responds to adjustments 1000 time per second, it's all down to software tuning... there's no reason it can't replicate how a conventional shock works. Imagine being able to adjust the shocks just by clicking around on the screen vs having to jack up the car or going under the hood/trunk. I hope they do. Also, any chance of a hi-per strut setup on the 1LE..? That would be amazing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#420 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,794
|
i guess you weren't on here yesterday, heres the cliff notes.
the opinion of the few here believe if you want MRC then you dont need more agressive aero, wheels/tires, alignment, sways, possible PDR, possible eLSD, possible 3.90s if you have a problem with that, buy an SS with MRC and source all the parts, and install them. the 911 GT3 RS has mag ride, but hey what does porsche know. if you're not modding, MRC is better than regular shocks. DSSV is better for the track than MRC. again, MRC doesn't belong on a 1LE even as an option, according to some here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed Thread
|
|
|