You are browsing camaro6 
04-29-2017, 06:08 PM
|
#29 |
      
|
I will admit the CAI does look much better. I am curious what one performa better head to head
__________________
 |
|
|
|
04-29-2017, 06:11 PM
|
#30 |
|
|
Is there a performance difference between a dry or an oiled filter for the intake?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2017, 07:28 PM
|
#31 | |
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS w/ Roto-fab CAI Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,682
|
Quote:
Our system has performed at the top in multiple head to head tests, showing gains from 6-14 HP. Michael |
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2017, 10:05 PM
|
#32 |
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Summit White Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 29
|
RotoFab for me with the sound tube delete. Absolutely love it!
|
|
|
|
|
04-30-2017, 12:05 AM
|
#33 |
    
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 Coupe Join Date: May 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,875
|
SSTony, check out Cold Air Inductions website if you are interested in their system. Mine was worth the money I spent for it. I really am impressed with the look, fit and finish. You seem to be getting biased info from the RotoFab folks on this posting. The RotoFab is very good system but I wanted a closed box. I had a similar looking CAI on my 2010 SS made by SLP Performance called a Blackwing that was open and sealed to the underside of the hood just like the RotoFab.
__________________
ZL1 Coupe, PDR, Exposed carbon fiber hood insert, My Link with Nav, M6 6 speed and Silver Ice Metallic. Mods done: ceramic window tint, GM Accessories Camaro floor mats and Roto-Fab CAI.
|
|
|
|
|
04-30-2017, 02:34 PM
|
#34 |
|
|
Yea it seems like everyone talks about rotofab
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
