Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V8 LT1 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2023, 09:42 AM   #29
SuperSnake1972
 
SuperSnake1972's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 chevrolet camaro 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: arizona
Posts: 96
Crushed

Just not a big fan of back pressure and restrictive flow. How come they don't make a kit for the automatic ?
SuperSnake1972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2023, 10:04 AM   #30
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,665
To answer your question, likely because of the AFM valves interferes and would have to added into the kit which would probably double the cost. Don't know for certain just speculation based on what I seen when I tried to use them. I ended up sending them back and changing the entire X pipe.

Either way, It's a waste of time, effort, and money until your are making A LOT more power than stock.
__________________

2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel
KingLT1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2023, 10:06 PM   #31
MyNameIs
Banned
 
Drives: Camaro SS
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Middle Park East, Liberty City
Posts: 331
Already been tested multiple times, the crushed pipe has absolutely no effect of hurting performance.
MyNameIs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2023, 02:55 PM   #32
oldman


 
Drives: SS 6 speed of course
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hilo, HI
Posts: 4,346
I agree but to a point, as some point in the build even NA, it will cause a restriction, sure it is at the rear where exhaust gasses have lost lots of their energy. My guess on a health NA engine with LT, heads, cam 3 to 10 HP. Stock almost zero, on a health FI build I can see upto 12 HP but we are talking engines reaching 900+ HP. Now if you ask me is there any power going from 2 and 3/4 stock size to 3" dunno about that one, even on 3/4 FI builds...
__________________
Forged short block, large duration sub .600 lift Cam Motion cam, 7200 RPM fuel cut, Pray Ported Heads, 3.85 pulley D1X, stage II intercooler, DSX secondary low side, DSX E85 sensor, Lingenfelter big bore 2.0 pump, ported front cats, 60608 Borla, LT4 injectors, ZL1 1LE driveshaft and Katech ported TB, ported MSD intake, BTR valvetrain, ARP studs, ProFlow valves, PS4 tires.
oldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2024, 08:49 PM   #33
wenlyone
 
Drives: Chevy camaro
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chatham nj
Posts: 13
Was the car retuned and then dyno’ed to see if it really makes no difference? Disturbing the flow with a smaller cross section will affect flow velocity.
wenlyone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2024, 03:00 PM   #34
lt4camaro


 
lt4camaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 LT1 10 speed auto
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigEnos View Post
Mishimoto did a very well controlled back-to-back of the "crushed" pipes vs. a round mandrel bent pipe and showed zero difference between the two. It's in this thread:
http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showth...exhaust&page=4

Note that they did this essentially as an FYI. They have no dog in the fight, but were probably just curious like the rest of us.

Facts:
Oval pipes flow just as well as round.
Factory oval pipe sections do not hurt performance.
Likely helps ground clearance.

If it just bothers you, then fine, change it. Know that you are only changing them and spending money, time, and effort for your own OCD tendencies.

You asked for opinions and I have one, though. Good luck.
But the crushed Zone is not oval, its crushed and does disrupt flow and sound
lt4camaro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.