|
|
#29 | ||||
![]() Drives: Corvette C5 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 177
|
2016 American muscle cars Crash Test - Video
2016 American muscle cars Crash Test
2016 Camaro Crash Test 2016 Challenger Crash Test 2016 Mustang Crash test |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
Did they make the automatic emerg. braking mandatory? I thought it was a voluntary compliance thing they announced a few months back..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 F150 Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,850
|
Quote:
NHTS press release: http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Pre...n-aeb-03172016 This includes a commitment from brands that have a lot of performance cars in their lineup: Audi, BMW, Jaguar, Maserati, Mercedes, and Porsche. The remaining 1% that didn't commit are probably low volume nameplates. Maybe Ferraris and Lamborghinis, although Lamborghini is owned by Audi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() Drives: 2017 2SS, 2000 Trans Am Firehawk Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: upstate, NY
Posts: 502
|
If Auto braking is mandatory I'll just quit buying new cars. It's bad enough now.
__________________
I am a sarcastic SOB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
I'm curious how they're going to figure out how to do the automatic braking with manual transmissions...that seems like a sure fire way to ensure stalls for everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Posted twice already...
http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=453763 |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2SS/RS - SIM Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,189
|
Wow - thanks for posting the videos!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,361
|
One thing this should put to rest is that all of these cars fare MUCH better than their 1960s- pre-airbag 1990s pre-cursors. I still hear people say "old cars are much better in an accident because they weigh more, have more steel, less plastic, and are bigger", yada yada yada.....
In all 3 of the 2016 models, while the driver will probably sustain some injuries, they will survive. With the old cars there is a good chance you could die, or at minimum be in critical condition for a while. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
|
Quote:
This now famous video shows that clearly... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Spring
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,564
|
The Camaro had the least amount of glass flying around in the side impact portion. Thank goodness for all that "poor visibility"...lol...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,361
|
Yes, exactly.
I'd like to see a 1967 Camaro head to head offset with a 2017 Camaro. Don't ruin a collectible though..... use some base straight 6 with a 2 speed powerglide and drum brakes and a base turbo 4 1LT automatic with no options lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|