JANNETTY RACING 2016 CAMARO SS LT1 AUTO STOCK DYNO NUMBERS - Page 3

JANNETTYRACING · 12-08-2015, 10:27 AM

Looking over the data and the Air flow in LB. per minute is reaching 46.65.

We know engines make 10 HP per lb of air, so 466.5 Crank HP is realistic.

Somewhere around 12-13% drive train loss depending if your multiplying up or down.

Ted.

*mlee* · 12-08-2015, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUMMIT WHITE SS

Are these numbers SAE corrected?

My question as well

Memphis43 · 12-08-2015, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlee

My question as well

Said it was

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

*mlee* · 12-08-2015, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Memphis43

Said it was

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JANNETTYRACING · 12-08-2015, 12:02 PM

Numbers are Standard Temp and Pressure.

corrects to 60 degree, dry air, 29.92 Barometric pressure.

I have the ability to print out SAE, STP, Actual (uncorrected) or dynojet numbers but stick to STP because it is repeatable at the track.

Everything is calculated from the measured number then the correction factor is applied to bring it back to what it would make on a standard day.

My correction factor for yesterday was 0.990 or 1% less than actual.

Where SAE would be 0.951 or about 4.9% less than actual

Actual numbers were 418 RWHP 435 RWTQ.

Ted.

IOMike · 12-08-2015, 12:31 PM

Wouldn't that be std, not stp. Unless you have the Stone Temple Pilots hanging out at the shop.

STD explains the slightly higher numbers. Would have been 408-410 sae.

JANNETTYRACING · 12-08-2015, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IOMike

Wouldn't that be std, not stp. Unless you have the Stone Temple Pilots hanging out at the shop.

STD explains the slightly higher numbers. Would have been 408-410 sae.

No sir it is in fact, STP Standard Temperature and Pressure.

Ted.

LOBBS · 12-08-2015, 12:58 PM

Our R&D auto car put down 397 to the rear wheels on our stingy Mustang dyno. That'd be pretty much in line with 414 on a Dynojet or different correction methods.

huggercamaro21 · 12-08-2015, 01:26 PM

These cars are simply amazing guys.

JANNETTYRACING · 12-08-2015, 04:57 PM

Got the Auto trans tuning software today

huggercamaro21 · 12-08-2015, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

Got the Auto trans tuning software today

Oh boy. Tune, stall, and trans tune with DRs maybe 11.5.....

Memphis43 · 12-08-2015, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huggercamaro21

Oh boy. Tune, stall, and trans tune with DRs maybe 11.5.....

Probably faster than that.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GMGP5X · 12-08-2015, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

Got the Auto trans tuning software today

Awesome!

huggercamaro21 · 12-08-2015, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Memphis43

Probably faster than that.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's nuts. Full bolt ones with stall, trans tune, and DRs are gonna be in the 10s.....Jebus

12-08-2015, 10:27 AM	#29
JANNETTYRACING Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6 Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT. Posts: 15,415	Looking over the data and the Air flow in LB. per minute is reaching 46.65. We know engines make 10 HP per lb of air, so 466.5 Crank HP is realistic. Somewhere around 12-13% drive train loss depending if your multiplying up or down. Ted. __________________ www.jannettyracing.com Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705 email tedj@jannettyracing.com

12-08-2015, 12:02 PM	#33
JANNETTYRACING Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6 Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT. Posts: 15,415	Numbers are Standard Temp and Pressure. corrects to 60 degree, dry air, 29.92 Barometric pressure. I have the ability to print out SAE, STP, Actual (uncorrected) or dynojet numbers but stick to STP because it is repeatable at the track. Everything is calculated from the measured number then the correction factor is applied to bring it back to what it would make on a standard day. My correction factor for yesterday was 0.990 or 1% less than actual. Where SAE would be 0.951 or about 4.9% less than actual Actual numbers were 418 RWHP 435 RWTQ. Ted. __________________ www.jannettyracing.com Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705 email tedj@jannettyracing.com

12-08-2015, 12:58 PM	#36
LOBBS Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2014 Location: Independence, MO Posts: 472 View My Garage	Our R&D auto car put down 397 to the rear wheels on our stingy Mustang dyno. That'd be pretty much in line with 414 on a Dynojet or different correction methods. Last edited by LOBBS; 12-08-2015 at 01:15 PM.

12-08-2015, 04:57 PM	#38
JANNETTYRACING Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6 Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT. Posts: 15,415	Got the Auto trans tuning software today __________________ www.jannettyracing.com Celebrating 39 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705 email tedj@jannettyracing.com

12-08-2015, 12:31 PM	#34
IOMike Drives: 2022 F150, 87 Monte Carlo Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: MN Posts: 1,267	Wouldn't that be std, not stp. Unless you have the Stone Temple Pilots hanging out at the shop. STD explains the slightly higher numbers. Would have been 408-410 sae.

12-08-2015, 01:26 PM	#37
huggercamaro21 Sales Manager for Chevy Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: DFW, Texas Posts: 1,313	These cars are simply amazing guys.

User Name		Remember Me?
Password