|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '91 RS Vert, '11 Grand Cherokee Join Date: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Rice Harvester
Drives: 2014 Bright Yellow 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Plainview, TX
Posts: 1,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS/RS Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 441
|
I think it looks more like a 6th Gen camaro concept than a cuda....I see a lot of similarities in the wide ass and rounded fenders that make me think camaro....Looks like they took the 5th gen and raked the front end and put a trans am grille on it....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I believe that it's time for all these cars to go beyond their past.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Anthrax Popcorn User
Drives: 2013 GT500 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,286
|
I think it's just a matter if time before we see the actual designs then some will like, some will hate.
Happens every redesign. I disliked the '99 Mustang redesign, then turns out my first Mustang was a '99. Then wasn't sold on the '05 redesign and bought a '13. Of course, you nuts have been crazy for the 5th gen Camaro forever so you wouldn't understand
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '91 RS Vert, '11 Grand Cherokee Join Date: May 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 10' IOM 2SS/RS, 13' GB Shelby GT500 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 2,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
The Dart and Charger have nothing to do with the original cars. Like the GTO, it's just the name slapped on something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 10' IOM 2SS/RS, 13' GB Shelby GT500 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 2,180
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: St. Joseph
Posts: 1,283
|
So the Grand Cherokee will be ONLY an SRT car, or will there be a "Jeep Grand Cherokee" too?
It will be retarded if there was both an "SRT Grand Cherokee" and a "Jeep Grand Cherokee". It's like having a Chevy Camaro and a Cadillac Camaro. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 10' IOM 2SS/RS, 13' GB Shelby GT500 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 2,180
|
Quote:
It's more likely that it would be named the SRT Cherokee. The SRT division is all performance.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|