04-20-2015, 10:37 PM | #309 |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,466
|
I recall a reputable and knowledgeable member was an eyewitness to some testing with the camo on....He stated his best estimate was the new Camaro appeared to be about 10-15%, not much (his words), smaller than the 5th Gen....
|
04-20-2015, 10:40 PM | #310 |
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
|
Just for the sake of the size topic...
i would call an FR-S with a 101in wheelbase...small, maybe even very small. Also, as much as i like the 5th, it is on the big side, so trimming it up is welcomed IMO. Nice comparison photo Angrybird...can't argue with that one very much considering it is almost in the same exact spot as the prototype. Scale looks pretty damn right on.
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod
|
04-20-2015, 10:49 PM | #311 | |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
So the CTS uses the longer wheelbase version of the platform. And ATS uses the shorter wheelbase version. Once the core parts are chosen and integrated, there's a good amount of unique changes that can be made for each application such as track width, roofline, etc, etc. And of course all the equipment that gets bolted onto the new "skeleton" can (and usually are) unique and custom-matched to the application. When you think size and how it relates to weight...you must think about all the metal that can be removed. If you keep the same wheelbase (length of the chassis between wheels) as the current car, all you're going to be able to shrink is the trunk and engine compartment. That's not going to do much in terms of weight savings, and would probably result in crappy proportions and an odd design. A lot of the material on the ends of the car is lightweight plastic, anyways. If you shrink the wheelbase a bit, now you've chopped away frame rails, cut inches of an entire unibody, fuel lines, prop-shaft, wiring, door length, etc. annnnnd...tugged the heavy parts of the suspension (wheels, brakes, and knuckles) closer to the center of gravity, making the car less resistant to yaw/rotational changes when, oh say, going into or coming out of a corner real fast. This will make the car feel more nimble, light, and reactant to driver input. |
|
04-21-2015, 12:56 AM | #312 | |
Drives: 2018 1SS M6 Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,617
|
Quote:
So, they start out with this basic architecture, and adjust the ends to fit the desired wheel base. So how can they make the car roughly the same size and still lose weight? Tech has come a long way in just a few short years. How they stiffened the Corvette, using lighter material and still making stiffer is a great example. Instead of making the frame rails all one thickness, they reinforced the critical areas with extra thickness, and the non critical with less. Thus they were able to make a an aluminum frame 60% stiffer then the old steel frame, while losing nearly 100 lbs off the assembled chassis. Basically getting more done with less is the product of this technology. The other benefit is being able to incorporate lighterwieght materials throughout the car. Things like composite suspension pieces, lighter sheet metal, or adding more composite parts. |
|
04-21-2015, 06:32 AM | #313 |
Hail to the King baby!
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,214
|
Guys, I hope I am incorrect on this. But this car will be smaller no doubt in my mind. If it isn't it will simply be because they put wider wheel offsets on it and designed the body around it. If they do that...........it's mass. They may elect to pick and choose elements of CTS and ATS variants to size the car just right. But if they pick the CTS, as I mentioned, it weighs nearly the same as my Zeta based SS. And I don't think the Camaro gets premium materials at a $22,000 starting point.
But we'll see soon.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
|
04-21-2015, 06:33 AM | #314 |
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,632
|
The gen5 is a big car compared to any pervious gen. When I drive it, my impression is that the car is wide compared to the 04 GTO I drive every day. My mother in-law walked through my garage last Friday and said "oh, what a big car". She is in no way car interested... at all.
Is it possible for Alpha to be narrower and not feel cramped?
__________________
"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Ronald Reagan - |
04-21-2015, 07:57 AM | #315 |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,957
|
I've said it before, I'll say it again. A Camaro that is a tad-bit smaller than the 5th gen sounds perfect to me, and I think that is what we are getting here. The 5th gen is larger than every other generation of Camaro...so I see nothing wrong with shrinking it back down a bit.
Sure, a few might complain, but those are the guys that really like the big long wide muscle car body types....the same type that loves the Challenger for its size. I'd say that most of us don't fall into that category...I know I don't. The only thing I might miss a little are the super wide hips on the 5th gen, assuming the 6th gen's are visually smaller, and from the spy shots they appear to be. This car isn't going to be BRZ/FRS/370Z small. Its going to be ATS sized, with likely a wider track and wider body and I think that will be absolutely perfect. Bring it on.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) Last edited by KMPrenger; 04-21-2015 at 10:21 AM. |
04-21-2015, 09:09 AM | #316 |
36.58625, -121.7568
|
I just can't wait for May
|
04-21-2015, 09:54 AM | #317 | ||
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
|
Quote:
Quote:
ATS-V 109.3 CTS-V 114.6 5Th Gen 112.3 6Th Gen ~110.5 (around M3 territory) - cut some of 5th Gen's huge @ss off, and trim the front a little, you get an overall smaller car, but not by much. Smaller + advancements in design and materials = AT LEAST (lets not forget that qualifier) 200Lbs lighter. BTW, new stang is 107.1, smaller than ATS-V wheelbase. So...IDK, As long as i can fit in it comfortably, it's all good.
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod
|
||
04-21-2015, 10:20 AM | #318 | |
Drives: 2018 1SS M6 Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,617
|
Quote:
Keep in mind that the "premium" materials you are speaking of, are those put into the Cadillacs, which is competing in a totally different market. The leather, the gadgets, etc. Just for example, the car a traded in for my '11 SS was an '06 STS. My STS was more of a base model, v6, no nav. But it had passive entry, push button start, remote start, valet mode, auto climate control. Although the dash and much of the interior pieces were indeed plastic, it was a soft touch sort of plastic, and of course it was as quiet as a church mouse. So, the base Camaro will have cloth seats, and the bare essentials in creature comforts. The Camaro lives in a completely different, and much larger market than the Cadillacs. They will also sell many,many more Camaros. In the world of mass production, the more you make and sell, the lower the per unit cost comes out to be, and you can price them a little closer to vest on the profit margin. |
|
04-21-2015, 10:25 AM | #319 | |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,957
|
Quote:
But they can add track width more easily, and in the case of the Camaro it was already stated that they have.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
04-21-2015, 11:40 AM | #320 | |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
In that respect, Number 3 was suggesting it would be difficult to keep the car affordable at the V6, T4 levels. |
|
04-21-2015, 12:18 PM | #321 |
Drives: 2003 accord Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 4
|
There is a 3rd alpha wheelbase...China has available an ats long wheelbase sedan. Here's a write up from autoblog. http://www.autoblog.com/2014/07/29/c...hina-official/
According to the article, the ats-l has a wheelbase of 112.5 inches. That splits the difference between the regular ats and cts. Although it's China only as ats, could work for gen 6. |
04-21-2015, 12:24 PM | #322 |
Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,035
|
The thing that worries me as Number3 alluded to is size. Everytime I have sat in an ATS I have felt cramped. I don't know if its the lay out, but it feels tiny on the inside to me.
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|