|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: 2022 Camaro LT1 Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 33
|
I didn't realize that was a possibility, so I didn't think to ask. Maybe it's something I should look into but unfortunately I don't have an answer now
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 23 ZL1 A10 Rapid Blue Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: MO
Posts: 2,243
|
That tuner device looks interesting to me, I haven't been all that interested in HP tuners or any of the remote tuning services, I didn't want to data log and go back and forth, more of a canned tune. I was more interested in running E85 but then I only have one station with Ethanol in my direct vicinity. I run and can run 93 but then there's only two options close by, too, so I've been a little on the fence about a tune like this. Impressive gains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2021 LT1 10 speed auto Join Date: May 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,355
|
Thats the difference between rear wheel horsepower versus horsepower at the flywheel. 400 rear wheel horsepower (car is on a chassis dyno) equates to approximately 460 flywheel horsepower ( manufacture's rating)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|