[sr71bb]

Originally Posted by cmitchell17

Thanks, and yeah that makes sense that you can still get away with aggressive camber since you have to have the combination of toe in/out with camber to create faster wear rate. In this case I think I got good life from the front NT05 regulars considering their treadwear rating. Of course I'm sure the biggest factor is how much aggressive turning you do and of course above all if you do a burnout you can literally see money flying out the window.

Do you think increasing camber more towards zero in the back, considering not caring about cornering performance and only straight line, will help that much with straight line traction?

I would also think having the slight negative (-0.9 degrees) may get more right as you get squat and weight transfer though? So maybe it gets more flat when the rear squats?

Well for straight line acceleration you want camber basically at ZERO The whole concept of NEGATIVE CAMBER is to get a bigger tire contact patch when the car is CORNERING and is working with HIGH lateral G forces.

WATCH the video below VERY carefully and you will see a car that is perfectly set up and as it wrinkles the slicks and transfers all of the energy in a forward motion as it carries front wheels off the ground. This is the fastest LT4 stock blower ZL1 car in the world.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CYE1Rp5L0FU/