|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 310
|
More air requires more fuel. How are the fuel demands on the ProCharger kit being met? I can't imagine the 30% fuel lobe on aftermarket camshafts is sufficient for 800+rwhp...or is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Drives: Many C7's Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 573
|
Quote:
On this particular Zl1, I am sure it will get a cam and supporting fuel modifications once its back in the hands of its owner. (Vengeance Racing) This one in the photos is actually Rons personal car. So you KNOW its going to be going BIG, like he usually does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Camaro Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 514
|
I'm running stock fuel system on 93 with two 15gph nozzles making 774/680
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() |
This is on a ZL1 so it's the LT4 fuel system and the LT4 engine has a raised fuel lobe already. I highly doubt just the lobe on an LT1 will support that HP level. I have the cam and flywheel estimated at 757hp with no fuel issues. I also wouldn't ask much more out of this fuel system.
Last edited by Chevy71; 05-25-2017 at 09:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: ex-wife's car Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 258
|
What's the cost on this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 Audi TT RS Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Navarre, Florida
Posts: 1,915
|
How much did that add to the cost of the system? Also, are we tracking if the gains are worth it over the stock manifold or even an MSD?
__________________
2018 Audi TT ▊RS
2.4X 0-60, 1.6X 60', 120+mph 1/8th, 4.XX 60-130, 150+mph traps on 255/35/18 R888R tires on the street (unprepped). 2019 Audi RS3 About as fast as the TT RS 2019 Camaro ZL1 1LE Sold 2018 Camaro SS 1LE Sold 2019 Corvette Z06 Sold 2021 Charger Hellcat Redeye Widebody Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() Drives: 2017 Nightfall Grey Auto 2SS Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Blue Springs MO.
Posts: 525
|
Quote:
As for gains I don't care about them over the other intake. I went with it so I could do a direct port meth set up. Maybe Procharger can answer the power gains or loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Drives: Many C7's Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 573
|
I am not going to debate our intake vs others....
Starting with....we are not an intake company, and really don't want to be. BUT, we needed something that was kick butt to go in the place of the factory blower on the LT4 cars we swap. And didn't find any other option that worked well under forced induction at the time. So thus we are here. Sadly it takes us SO long to make these darn things, its not really a "profit" item for us. But they work really really well, from low HP to even well over 1,000+ |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 1,138
|
Quote:
__________________
2018 ZL1…Many mods to come
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 310
|
Quote:
Quote:
In time, I am sure that a reliable fuel system will be developed. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Drives: 2016 2SS Camaro Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 541
|
We install tons of these intakes at Vengeance. I'd say it's rare for us to do a C7 Procharger that doesn't use the intake. It works!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Carolina, PR
Posts: 47
|
That's debatable, as if you calibrate to be meth dependent it would never go into the dangerous lean zone... It will be so lean, like over stoich, that the engine will not produce any power and will flat in its face and will not even accelerate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
This is awesome!!! I sure hope to see this car at Camaro Fest in July.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|