|
|
#15 |
![]() ![]() Drives: future 2016 SS Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 847
|
I am certain it is a collaboration. AEM made the nismo intake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6 Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
|
I wonder what the filtering efficiency is of the performance intake vs. the stock airbox?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS/M6 Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 225
|
Just received an email from CAI Inc. about there Gen 6 Camaro intake and it reminded me of this dumb argument from a while back. See the similarities now??
__________________
Suck Squeeze Bang Blow
Last edited by kannon; 03-01-2016 at 06:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() Drives: future 2016 SS Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 847
|
Have they flat out said they make the intake for GM performance? I saw the other threads but I may have missed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
The Dogfather
Drives: #1 off the line for a customer. '16 Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Andover, KS
Posts: 2,621
|
Quote:
This is just my assumption derived from my own research and experience. I didn't make either filter nor was I in the inner circle of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,522
|
Seems to me that the only thing that would require a tune is if the cross section of tube around the MAF is a different circumference than the stock setup. Nothing else about the cold air intake should affect any aspect of tuning as the engine would adapt to any beneficial colder air and you're not ramming air in so there's no issue with positive intake pressure.
So that would suggest that either the GM Performance intake has a larger intake tube than stock and C.A.I's is not or that the tune, if there is one, is tweaking something else that could be done regardless of the intake. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|