[SpeedIsLife]

Originally Posted by strykerg8gt

Car looks great and has a ton of potential. I'm still saddened by the fact that they put cylinder deactivation aka DOD in it. Please GM its a supercar, make this right and drop it for next model year.

If it's messing with your universe so severely..tune it out (and nuke your warranty in the process).

Otherwise..I think you'll survive

[sycraft]

Gen 8 vette already in the works

[strykerg8gt]

Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife

If it's messing with your universe so severely..tune it out (and nuke your warranty in the process).

Otherwise..I think you'll survive

I'd prefer not to have to tune it out and void the warranty. Plus I don't trust any DOD lifters. They don't exactly have a quality reputation in high HP applications.

Oh and if my posts are messing with your universe so severely that you feel the need to respond like you did then feel free to tune them out. Quite frankly responding to your post is a waste of my time since you added nothing constructive and only felt like bashing someone else's opinion/preference.

[Stingray]

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65

All Z06 models get clear taillights.

Originally Posted by shaffe

BAD ASS
but is it just me or does it look like its sitting a little high? or not filling out the wheel well?

It can be dropped up to an inch using the stock bolts... I did.

[rocket403]

The Vette looks good until I see the backend it's just to busy just not a fan of that rear end treatment.

I like this rear end treatment just much cleaner, sometimes less is better.

[newmoon]

Originally Posted by rocket403

The Vette looks good until I see the backend it's just to busy just not a fan of that rear end treatment.

I like this rear end treatment just much cleaner, sometimes less is better.

I agree the car is really nice except for that awful rear-end view. I have no idea what Chevy was thinking but whomever the designer was he/she needs to be fired.

[SS 376]

Originally Posted by rocket403

The Vette looks good until I see the backend it's just to busy just not a fan of that rear end treatment.

I like this rear end treatment just much cleaner, sometimes less is better.

I'm sure there will be round taillight bumper conversions out there.

[Stingray]

If I wanted those lamps I'd get a C6... I like the change, it's for the better IMO... but different strokes for different folks. I prefer this look... the way GM engineers designed it, for the present & future not the past.

[DDoug]

Hey, that's Michigan Avenue!

Good to see they're out and about, hopefully start seeing them buzzing around the Tech. Center.

[FenwickHockey65]

I'm glad they changed the taillights. The new ones are so much better.

[ilirg]

Love the taillights, looks so bad ass in person

[Drumminxx]

me too...love the tail!

[Stingray]

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65

I'm glad they changed the taillights. The new ones are so much better.

Originally Posted by ilirg

Love the taillights, looks so bad ass in person

Originally Posted by Drumminxx

me too...love the tail!

And the C7 taillight hating is a dead beaten horse long time ago... now just repetitive drama IMO.

More test mule pics of those Z06's in the wild....


With Jim Mero on the Shark Gray (GM Engineer/Driver... he drove the C6 ZR1's impressive ‘ring time of 7:19.63 back in 2011)


Night Race Blue


Laguna Blue

[hotlap]

Originally Posted by rocket403

The Vette looks good until I see the backend it's just to busy just not a fan of that rear end treatment.

Originally Posted by newmoon

I agree the car is really nice except for that awful rear-end view. I have no idea what Chevy was thinking but whomever the designer was he/she needs to be fired.

Neither are Chevy fans. The new Vette is stunning IMO