03-16-2013, 07:44 PM | #15 |
Moderator
|
I strongly doubt that this will happen.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN. warn 145:159 ban |
03-16-2013, 09:24 PM | #16 |
Remember the Charleston 9
Drives: 2004 KME PREDATOR, 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Summerv1LE SC
Posts: 5,381
|
The base Corvette or the 5.3L making its way into a 6th gen Camaro?
__________________
BRING BACK THE B4C POLICE CAMARO!
2002 V-6 5 speed rally red (current camaro) Also driven:1992 Z-28 305 auto Red w/ black stripes (anniversary), 2001 V-6 auto light pewter metallic,1991 RS V-6 auto Black |
03-16-2013, 09:30 PM | #17 |
Cajun Mariner
Drives: 10 Camaro SS/RS 15 Camaro Z/82 AGM Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Real Cajun,Golden Meadow, LA.
Posts: 673
|
Y'all talk about the 5.3 like it's a piece of trash but the COPO Camaro only comes with 2 engines, supercharged 5.3 and LS7. Don't forget about the ZL1 engines in the Camaro there were a few of them and I think the L88 427 made it into a few Camaro's also
__________________
'10 Camaro 2SS/RS Red Jewel VVTLS3/A6
'15Camaro Z/28 Ashen Gray |
03-16-2013, 10:02 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
COPO engines are a completely different animal than production motors.
|
03-16-2013, 11:13 PM | #19 |
I think it might not be a bad idea, I mean it's a 327, depending on the internals a nice "smaller" displacement v8 that can rev might be something that hits market that the lt1 may miss.
__________________
|
|
03-17-2013, 01:38 AM | #20 | |||
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
|||
03-17-2013, 04:19 AM | #21 |
redleader
|
I never understand why a 3.6 doesn't get near twice the MPG of a 6.2. Hopefully the new Gen will ?
|
03-17-2013, 11:06 AM | #22 |
|
I think the 5.3 in the Camaro is the worst idea I have ever heard. A twin turbo V6 would be so much better, let the NA guys have the LT1 and give the FI guys a TT engine. Although Dodge did it successfully with the RT and SRT lineups. I guess it isnt the worse thing afterall but I still prefer a TT to mod the hell out of easily.
__________________
Used Racing Brake 2 Peice Rotors for sale:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=344754 Summit White 2014 2SS 1LE Recaros, NPP exhaust, Nav 2010 2SS A6 - sold. |
03-17-2013, 12:01 PM | #23 | |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,957
|
Quote:
There are 4 cylinder cars that don't get twice the highway mileage of the SS and especially the Vette. Gas mileage doesn't directly correlate to the size of the engine. If you feel it does you have much learning to do my friend. As for the talk of this 5.3...I don't understand some of the comments here. First off let me say that I'm not at all convinced the 5.3 will make its way into the Vette OR Camaro. But lets say it does. Take a look at the Ford 5.0 V8. In truck form, the 2011 model made 360 HP, and that same year it made 412HP in the Mustang. So if Chevy does the same, I don't see why we couldn't have a 375 horse truck version and a 420HP version in the next gen Camaro. It uses much of the same direct injection tech that the current V6 uses, and the LT1 uses, and they both have nice flat wide torque curves....so I'm guessing the 5.3 does as well. I'd love to see the LT1 in the next Camaro, but I have no doubts that a properly factory tuned 5.3 in the ligher next gen Camaro couldn't stomp on the current 6.2 in this gen.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
03-17-2013, 12:54 PM | #24 |
redleader
|
I'm just niave :-(
Thanks for the Xtra info. |
03-17-2013, 01:24 PM | #25 |
THE ROD MAN
Drives: 2010 ABM 2SS/RS #631 Join Date: May 2010
Location: TENNESSEE
Posts: 558
|
Cant wait to find out
__________________
|
03-17-2013, 02:42 PM | #26 |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,957
|
No problem....sorry if it came out as bashing. Not my intent, but you lurk around here for very long and you will learn a lot!
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
03-17-2013, 03:13 PM | #27 |
Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
|
I am definitely thinking the 5.3L DI would outperform the current LS3 with all the tech it will have in it..stop thinking of it as "only a truck motor" it is completely redesigned and the LT1 has been compared to the LS7, the DI most certainly plays a factor in this and torque rating should not suffer due to lower displacement size!
|
03-17-2013, 03:21 PM | #28 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
I've got to point out.....I just had chills. Reading through....re-reading out of curiosity....I had this flashback of a 2008 thread.
We were discussing - almost identically as we are right now - how Chevy should put the L76 (361hp) from the then-current G8 GT into the base V8 car, and the LS2 (400hp) into the upper-trim..... Instead, we got an LS3 for "cheap", and an LSA in our upper-V8 trim. I'm hoping history repeats itself!! My only problem with this concept of a base model 5.3L is cost...it won't be any cheaper to produce a 5.3L than the LT1...not if we're assuming it uses all the same tech. |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|