|
|
#2451 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
Second, it was a troll comment. Because when you got an answer you decided to be a smartass about it instead of accepting the answer. And I'll repeat, you did the exact same thing when I asked you the question. You gave a direct smartass criticism to Ultra and you were condescending. Now if you're that oblivious to your own damn attitude then fine. But don't sit here acting all innocent when you get called on it. I posted your comment about Ultra a couple times at least. Anyone can see that you were being condescending. And if you weren't, then why did you take my question to you the way you did? Third, I do take my car to the track and no, I don't try. The fact that my not trying landed me an ET and MPH that a stock Mustang needs perfectly ideal conditions and a pro driver launching and shifting the hell out of it just to still NOT manage to pull off tells me that the S550 Mustang even after all this time is still pathetic. And even if it could manage to duplicate my novice times, which it can't, it still would be nothing more than a one trick pony at it's very best. And the fact that the Mustang is the only one of the Big Three that still can't run a decent time without perfect conditions says a lot. So next time you really wanna know if a Camaro can do this or that, maybe you should consider the multitude of limitations the Mustang has because at it's best it is still the slowest overall. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2452 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2453 | ||
|
Banned
Drives: 2013 GB GT Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2454 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2455 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
What is the possibility of us seeing an actual H2H with the SS 1LE vs the GT PP2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2456 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2457 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: E92 BMW M3 Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,496
|
Quote:
Would it be out of line expecting the Tremec to trickle down in there too? Ford's approach this generation makes me feel like it is out of line, but I am not sure if Ford is as rigid as GM or if there is a precedence for things like this set in previous generations.
__________________
SOLD - 2013 1LE - Pat G Spec'd Cam, NPP with 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers with High Flow Cats, Intake w/scoop, Ported Throttle Body, and Apex 1.25" Lowering Springs.
J-Rod Built and Matt@FSP Tuned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2458 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2459 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Billings MT
Posts: 773
|
Quote:
The Bullitt engine being the base GT engine sounds like a no brainer but what will the 2020 SS and Chally have by then? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2460 | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 21 Bronco Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,043
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2461 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2016 1SS (previous) Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Metro-Detroit
Posts: 1,869
|
Quote:
1. The TR-3160 was completely validated through the GT350 and wouldn't take much to further qualify it for the Coyote G3. 2. The TR-3160 was already integrated into the S550 platform via the GT350. 3. The 2011-2014 and 2015-2017 MT-82's were largely the same, with only small improvements over time. So, the return on investment into that project over those years should have been enough to call the business case a wraps (especially with the sales numbers the S550 brought). With the 2018, the MT82 is basically re-invented... So, there is a significant re-investment by Ford. I would expect the MT82 to stay until the S650/Gen7 Mustang. https://youtu.be/s7rUZKhdMOM History indicates the Bullitt upgrades will trickle down to the GT. At that point, Camaro will become the underdog. Right now, things are pretty equal from a power standpoint, engine vs. engine. Camaro is hard to tell right now... Mainly because the sales. Before the 2019 refresh, I would have said, for sure, the DOHC V8 would make its way to the Camaro at some point/way. The pre-2019 Camaros were already a compromise towards a performance car, hurting overall sales, but now you have a refresh that is very polarizing and seems to be targeting a very select audience. I do not think the 2019 Camaro exterior refresh is equal to the 2018 Mustang exterior refresh. The Camaro went through a complete change of the front and a significant change in the rear. The Mustang went through a moderate change of the front and a minor change of the rear. The character of the Camaro has been completely changed, where the Mustang was only modified. Challenger will likely soldier-on with what they have, like they have been doing for the last decade, for a few more years. Don't expect changes until they, maybe, decide to invest into a new chassis (I'd love to see a Challenger in Mustang size/weight). On the surface, the sales numbers for Challenger/Charger make the vehicle look like "they got it figured out", but if you look into the entire picture, it's more like "riding the wave". Last edited by Mountain; 10-09-2018 at 05:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2462 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Tesla M3 LR-AWD [Former 1SS owner] Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Miami
Posts: 950
|
Quote:
The fact that they didn't trust it the GT350 says it all. And the Tremec in the GT-350 is actually a lower spec'd one compared to the TR-6060. So Ford didn't even see the need to give their owners more headroom. They say the MT-82 is revised, smooth, blah blah blah. No, it's just cheap!! It's about the bottom line. Let's put the cheap crap in the base and go with something just a little bit better for the higher dollar cars. As for the engines, I look down on the Coyote and Voodoo. IMO, they are unfinished and unreliable. And being DOHC is not the be-all and end all. Not when Ford seems to be issuing short block replacements like there's no tomorrow. The old push rod LT1 has a lot of potential left. GM can continue to improve and run with it for years to come. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2463 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2016 1SS (previous) Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Metro-Detroit
Posts: 1,869
|
Quote:
The Gen3 Coyote seems to have reliability issues and, of course, the Voodoo. I blame the spray bores (suspect cheapened-out, high-volume processing) and vibrations in those cases. But the Gen1 and Gen2 Coyotes and Roadrunner were very good engines. Last edited by Mountain; 10-10-2018 at 10:00 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2464 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: E92 BMW M3 Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,496
|
Yeah, the reason I posed the question about the Tremec is Ford doesn't have any really attractive manual offerings right now.
To get the Tremec, you have to sign up for the Voodoo...no thanks. Pre-Gen 3 Coyote you could geta reliable engine, but with the MT-82....again no thanks. Would be awesome to see them offer something like a Mach 1 with a worked out Gen 3 Coyote with a power bump and the Tremec from the GT350. THEN.....I would be a serious potential buyer if ADMs dont get in the way.
__________________
SOLD - 2013 1LE - Pat G Spec'd Cam, NPP with 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers with High Flow Cats, Intake w/scoop, Ported Throttle Body, and Apex 1.25" Lowering Springs.
J-Rod Built and Matt@FSP Tuned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|