Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-06-2018, 01:26 AM   #2451
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
How the **** is asking whether the Camaro has run faster than a particular time by a Mustang a troll when its posted in a"Vs 2018 Mustang" thread. You have to be the most hypersensitive fanboy I have come across besides "thepill".

The Camaro has had 3 yrs of fall/winters to run in. Some of the guys who are posting the fastest times frequent this thread. I asked a legit question without knowing the answer. I had not seen a faster pass from the camaro with those mods, but I'm not upto date on what the Camaro has best run.

My responses to Ultra and Snow were matter of fact and not condescending in the slightest, I don't believe they took it that way, but if they did it was not my intention.

Why do you even care? you are the guy who takes his car to the track to not try. Yet you get the most defensive about things that apparently matter little to you.
First off, I AM a fan of the Camaro. Definitely. I'd pick the Camaro any day over the Mustang. SO if you wanna call me a "fanboy" then so be it. I don't give a rats ass. And I have no idea who "the pill" is.

Second, it was a troll comment. Because when you got an answer you decided to be a smartass about it instead of accepting the answer. And I'll repeat, you did the exact same thing when I asked you the question. You gave a direct smartass criticism to Ultra and you were condescending. Now if you're that oblivious to your own damn attitude then fine. But don't sit here acting all innocent when you get called on it. I posted your comment about Ultra a couple times at least. Anyone can see that you were being condescending. And if you weren't, then why did you take my question to you the way you did?

Third, I do take my car to the track and no, I don't try. The fact that my not trying landed me an ET and MPH that a stock Mustang needs perfectly ideal conditions and a pro driver launching and shifting the hell out of it just to still NOT manage to pull off tells me that the S550 Mustang even after all this time is still pathetic. And even if it could manage to duplicate my novice times, which it can't, it still would be nothing more than a one trick pony at it's very best. And the fact that the Mustang is the only one of the Big Three that still can't run a decent time without perfect conditions says a lot. So next time you really wanna know if a Camaro can do this or that, maybe you should consider the multitude of limitations the Mustang has because at it's best it is still the slowest overall.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2018, 01:57 AM   #2452
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
The new gt is a great performer. But the SS is still in the game. That’s how I see it. Pretty impressive for a drivetrain introduced almost 5 years ago.

I might have to give the GT a slight edge NA bolt on all things equal. But nothing that can’t easily be overcome. And when it comes to heads cam NA power output the lt1 is beast already reaching nearly 600 rwhp with ported stock castings. Then after that it’s not cube limited like the coyote. NA to NA in the end lt1 wins. Now boost is a different story. On the stock bottom end the mustang is superior. It also doesn’t have as many fueling issues. The lt1 can get it done but you need pistons and expensive fueling upgrades to compete with a more basic FI coyote setup. But in the end it all comes down to money
I'm not impressed with the GT because I think it's too late in the game. I liked the S197 Coyotes and what Ford did from 2011 to 2014. But I am not a fan of the S550 from a performance perspective. Even now, if it does happen to be faster, that will all change when the SS gets the A10 trans at which point we'll see thing either switch to the Camaro side once again or it'll be too close for either to declare a victory. What I think Ford should have done was they should have upped the GT to where the SS couldn't possibly catch it with the A10, built the PP2 properly with coolers, dropped the Shelby, and then brought out the GT500. But the fact that they didn't tells me they're still fighting with kiddie gloves. Perhaps the next Gen Mustang will be better. But I don't care how many YT videos these guys post of Mustangs doing whatever with this or that mod, nothing short of the GT500 is going to impress me. And that thing better be a killer.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2018, 11:58 AM   #2453
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
The new gt is a great performer. But the SS is still in the game. That’s how I see it. Pretty impressive for a drivetrain introduced almost 5 years ago.

I might have to give the GT a slight edge NA bolt on all things equal. But nothing that can’t easily be overcome. And when it comes to heads cam NA power output the lt1 is beast already reaching nearly 600 rwhp with ported stock castings. Then after that it’s not cube limited like the coyote. NA to NA in the end lt1 wins. Now boost is a different story. On the stock bottom end the mustang is superior. It also doesn’t have as many fueling issues. The lt1 can get it done but you need pistons and expensive fueling upgrades to compete with a more basic FI coyote setup. But in the end it all comes down to money
spot on, couldn’t agree more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
First off, I AM a fan of the Camaro. Definitely. I'd pick the Camaro any day over the Mustang. SO if you wanna call me a "fanboy" then so be it. I don't give a rats ass. And I have no idea who "the pill" is.

Second, it was a troll comment. Because when you got an answer you decided to be a smartass about it instead of accepting the answer. And I'll repeat, you did the exact same thing when I asked you the question. You gave a direct smartass criticism to Ultra and you were condescending. Now if you're that oblivious to your own damn attitude then fine. But don't sit here acting all innocent when you get called on it. I posted your comment about Ultra a couple times at least. Anyone can see that you were being condescending. And if you weren't, then why did you take my question to you the way you did?

Third, I do take my car to the track and no, I don't try. The fact that my not trying landed me an ET and MPH that a stock Mustang needs perfectly ideal conditions and a pro driver launching and shifting the hell out of it just to still NOT manage to pull off tells me that the S550 Mustang even after all this time is still pathetic. And even if it could manage to duplicate my novice times, which it can't, it still would be nothing more than a one trick pony at it's very best. And the fact that the Mustang is the only one of the Big Three that still can't run a decent time without perfect conditions says a lot. So next time you really wanna know if a Camaro can do this or that, maybe you should consider the multitude of limitations the Mustang has because at it's best it is still the slowest overall.
You keep fighting the good fight.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2018, 02:35 PM   #2454
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
You keep fighting the good fight.
I definitely will next time you make a failed attempt to troll.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2018, 06:07 PM   #2455
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
What is the possibility of us seeing an actual H2H with the SS 1LE vs the GT PP2?
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 06:29 AM   #2456
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
I'm not impressed with the GT because I think it's too late in the game. I liked the S197 Coyotes and what Ford did from 2011 to 2014. But I am not a fan of the S550 from a performance perspective. Even now, if it does happen to be faster, that will all change when the SS gets the A10 trans at which point we'll see thing either switch to the Camaro side once again or it'll be too close for either to declare a victory. What I think Ford should have done was they should have upped the GT to where the SS couldn't possibly catch it with the A10, built the PP2 properly with coolers, dropped the Shelby, and then brought out the GT500. But the fact that they didn't tells me they're still fighting with kiddie gloves. Perhaps the next Gen Mustang will be better. But I don't care how many YT videos these guys post of Mustangs doing whatever with this or that mod, nothing short of the GT500 is going to impress me. And that thing better be a killer.
My guess is that the GT350 will wrap up in the next model year. At that point you will see the 480 hp Bullitt motor on the standard GT and the coolers on the PP2. The 500 will then appear but the GT will not be a threat. Look for a Mach1 package with another bump in HP as well.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 08:14 AM   #2457
ST1LE


 
ST1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 BMW M3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
My guess is that the GT350 will wrap up in the next model year. At that point you will see the 480 hp Bullitt motor on the standard GT and the coolers on the PP2. The 500 will then appear but the GT will not be a threat. Look for a Mach1 package with another bump in HP as well.
With all the quarter mile talk, and considering the obvious inclusion of the A10 in those conversations, we don't talk much about the manuals.

Would it be out of line expecting the Tremec to trickle down in there too? Ford's approach this generation makes me feel like it is out of line, but I am not sure if Ford is as rigid as GM or if there is a precedence for things like this set in previous generations.
__________________
SOLD - 2013 1LE - Pat G Spec'd Cam, NPP with 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers with High Flow Cats, Intake w/scoop, Ported Throttle Body, and Apex 1.25" Lowering Springs.
J-Rod Built and Matt@FSP Tuned
ST1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 09:12 AM   #2458
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by ST1LE View Post
With all the quarter mile talk, and considering the obvious inclusion of the A10 in those conversations, we don't talk much about the manuals.

Would it be out of line expecting the Tremec to trickle down in there too? Ford's approach this generation makes me feel like it is out of line, but I am not sure if Ford is as rigid as GM or if there is a precedence for things like this set in previous generations.
No idea on the Tremec, it would be nice but the MT82 is improving compared to the earlier versions. That being said if 1/4 mile is your thing the A10 will be your choice. I do know that an automatic transmission in my Boss would ruin the car, so I hope that the manuals continue to be an option.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 12:12 PM   #2459
Chadicus

 
Drives: 2017 2SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Billings MT
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
No idea on the Tremec, it would be nice but the MT82 is improving compared to the earlier versions. That being said if 1/4 mile is your thing the A10 will be your choice. I do know that an automatic transmission in my Boss would ruin the car, so I hope that the manuals continue to be an option.
I think the Tremec should replace the MT82 right now. There have been versions of it that are better than others but honestly no version is as good as the Tremec. Just scrap it already Ford. I also see a trackpack version of the PP2 coming with coolers.

The Bullitt engine being the base GT engine sounds like a no brainer but what will the 2020 SS and Chally have by then?
Chadicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 12:34 PM   #2460
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
What is the possibility of us seeing an actual H2H with the SS 1LE vs the GT PP2?
I would like to see that as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
My guess is that the GT350 will wrap up in the next model year. At that point you will see the 480 hp Bullitt motor on the standard GT and the coolers on the PP2. The 500 will then appear but the GT will not be a threat. Look for a Mach1 package with another bump in HP as well.
This I would also guess is a very realistic possibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadicus View Post
I think the Tremec should replace the MT82 right now. There have been versions of it that are better than others but honestly no version is as good as the Tremec. Just scrap it already Ford. I also see a trackpack version of the PP2 coming with coolers.

The Bullitt engine being the base GT engine sounds like a no brainer but what will the 2020 SS and Chally have by then?
Well the Challenger engine is a mystery, the Camaro will still plod along with the LT1. When there was no update done at the refresh I think the LT1 will soldier on until the 6th gen is finished. I don't see them replacing it like GM did with the C6 when it from LS2 to LS3
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 04:34 PM   #2461
Mountain

 
Mountain's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2016 1SS (previous)
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Metro-Detroit
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadicus View Post
I think the Tremec should replace the MT82 right now. There have been versions of it that are better than others but honestly no version is as good as the Tremec. Just scrap it already Ford. I also see a trackpack version of the PP2 coming with coolers.

The Bullitt engine being the base GT engine sounds like a no brainer but what will the 2020 SS and Chally have by then?
There's no way Ford would do that. From an investment standpoint - no way. The opportunity was when the S550 came out or with the 2018 Refresh/Redesign. Probably the best opportunity was for 2018:

1. The TR-3160 was completely validated through the GT350 and wouldn't take much to further qualify it for the Coyote G3.

2. The TR-3160 was already integrated into the S550 platform via the GT350.

3. The 2011-2014 and 2015-2017 MT-82's were largely the same, with only small improvements over time. So, the return on investment into that project over those years should have been enough to call the business case a wraps (especially with the sales numbers the S550 brought).

With the 2018, the MT82 is basically re-invented... So, there is a significant re-investment by Ford. I would expect the MT82 to stay until the S650/Gen7 Mustang.
https://youtu.be/s7rUZKhdMOM

History indicates the Bullitt upgrades will trickle down to the GT. At that point, Camaro will become the underdog. Right now, things are pretty equal from a power standpoint, engine vs. engine.

Camaro is hard to tell right now... Mainly because the sales. Before the 2019 refresh, I would have said, for sure, the DOHC V8 would make its way to the Camaro at some point/way. The pre-2019 Camaros were already a compromise towards a performance car, hurting overall sales, but now you have a refresh that is very polarizing and seems to be targeting a very select audience. I do not think the 2019 Camaro exterior refresh is equal to the 2018 Mustang exterior refresh. The Camaro went through a complete change of the front and a significant change in the rear. The Mustang went through a moderate change of the front and a minor change of the rear. The character of the Camaro has been completely changed, where the Mustang was only modified.

Challenger will likely soldier-on with what they have, like they have been doing for the last decade, for a few more years. Don't expect changes until they, maybe, decide to invest into a new chassis (I'd love to see a Challenger in Mustang size/weight). On the surface, the sales numbers for Challenger/Charger make the vehicle look like "they got it figured out", but if you look into the entire picture, it's more like "riding the wave".

Last edited by Mountain; 10-09-2018 at 05:00 PM.
Mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 11:22 PM   #2462
torqueaddict

 
Drives: Tesla M3 LR-AWD [Former 1SS owner]
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Miami
Posts: 950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadicus View Post
I think the Tremec should replace the MT82 right now. There have been versions of it that are better than others but honestly no version is as good as the Tremec. Just scrap it already Ford. I also see a trackpack version of the PP2 coming with coolers.

The Bullitt engine being the base GT engine sounds like a no brainer but what will the 2020 SS and Chally have by then?
The Tremec should have replaced the MT-82 in all their cars a looong time ago.

The fact that they didn't trust it the GT350 says it all. And the Tremec in the GT-350 is actually a lower spec'd one compared to the TR-6060. So Ford didn't even see the need to give their owners more headroom.

They say the MT-82 is revised, smooth, blah blah blah. No, it's just cheap!! It's about the bottom line. Let's put the cheap crap in the base and go with something just a little bit better for the higher dollar cars.

As for the engines, I look down on the Coyote and Voodoo. IMO, they are unfinished and unreliable. And being DOHC is not the be-all and end all. Not when Ford seems to be issuing short block replacements like there's no tomorrow.

The old push rod LT1 has a lot of potential left. GM can continue to improve and run with it for years to come.
torqueaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 09:47 AM   #2463
Mountain

 
Mountain's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2016 1SS (previous)
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Metro-Detroit
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by torqueaddict View Post
The Tremec should have replaced the MT-82 in all their cars a looong time ago.

The fact that they didn't trust it the GT350 says it all. And the Tremec in the GT-350 is actually a lower spec'd one compared to the TR-6060. So Ford didn't even see the need to give their owners more headroom.

They say the MT-82 is revised, smooth, blah blah blah. No, it's just cheap!! It's about the bottom line. Let's put the cheap crap in the base and go with something just a little bit better for the higher dollar cars.

As for the engines, I look down on the Coyote and Voodoo. IMO, they are unfinished and unreliable. And being DOHC is not the be-all and end all. Not when Ford seems to be issuing short block replacements like there's no tomorrow.

The old push rod LT1 has a lot of potential left. GM can continue to improve and run with it for years to come.
GM, I think, has taken the OHV/push-rod engine about as far as it can go, with mass production business reason. Think about the displacement: increased displacement is needed to get the needed competitive power in OHV form. Going forward, you need more fuel efficiency, similar/lower weight, tight packaging, and more power. The options to increase power are, from a staying NA OHV perspective, increased displacement, increased RPM and increased efficiency. They are already very near or at the ceiling for RPM, efficiency and displacement before stepping into an area that becomes either unreasonable for business or negativly effects another aspect.

The Gen3 Coyote seems to have reliability issues and, of course, the Voodoo. I blame the spray bores (suspect cheapened-out, high-volume processing) and vibrations in those cases. But the Gen1 and Gen2 Coyotes and Roadrunner were very good engines.

Last edited by Mountain; 10-10-2018 at 10:00 AM.
Mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2018, 01:06 PM   #2464
ST1LE


 
ST1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: E92 BMW M3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,496
Yeah, the reason I posed the question about the Tremec is Ford doesn't have any really attractive manual offerings right now.

To get the Tremec, you have to sign up for the Voodoo...no thanks. Pre-Gen 3 Coyote you could geta reliable engine, but with the MT-82....again no thanks.

Would be awesome to see them offer something like a Mach 1 with a worked out Gen 3 Coyote with a power bump and the Tremec from the GT350.

THEN.....I would be a serious potential buyer if ADMs dont get in the way.
__________________
SOLD - 2013 1LE - Pat G Spec'd Cam, NPP with 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers with High Flow Cats, Intake w/scoop, Ported Throttle Body, and Apex 1.25" Lowering Springs.
J-Rod Built and Matt@FSP Tuned
ST1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.