|
|
#183 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#184 |
|
|Engineer|
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 402
|
> V6 vs V8 Dilemma
V8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#185 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: LT W/2LT,blue metallic Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: central florida
Posts: 5,043
|
i can sort of understand this.less drama/rpms/shifting inside the car makes the mrs. assume she is not travelling as fast.quicker acceleration but its over with no drama.these cars are fairly quiet,ive had my RS up to 110 while my wife was reading the paper in the passenger seat and she though we were putting along at 70.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#186 | |||
![]() Drives: 2014 2SS/RS/1LE Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Hurricane Alley
Posts: 700
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I4 - 121.9 cu. in. - 275hp - 295 tq 2.26 hp per cubic inch, 2.42 tq per cubic inch V6 - 222.1 cu in. - 335hp - 284 tq. 1.51 hp per cubic inch, 1.28 tq per cubic inch LT1 V8 - 376 cu. in. - 455hp - 455 tq 1.21 hp and tq per cubic inch
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#187 | |
|
Retired fr GM + SP Global
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,043
|
Quote:
Boosted DOHCs (like the Camaro I4) can make up to 200 hp/liter. That would have a 2.0L turbo hitting 400 hp (Honda Civic Type R is about 175/liter, Mercedes CLA AMG 2.0T is just under 400 hp, and expected to improve to over 400). Camaro is at 137.5 hp/l. Mustang 2.3T is at 152 hp/l. That's why they no longer offer a V6.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#188 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS & '99 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,975
|
I haven't driven the Manual and I understand it has two less gears, but from a dig, pulling out with the V6 is cake-walk. Its at the top-end where things get dicey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#189 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2019 Dodge Challenger Scat Pack Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Frederick, Colorado
Posts: 1,245
|
That's what I thought lol. I'd say I'm safer in my V6 because I've learned instead of speeding up to cut everyone off I'll just get in line and follow the traffic. The 12 seconds I saved round trip eventually don't matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190 | ||
|
Moderator.ca
|
Quote:
Just because an engine is spinning fast doesn't mean the wheels have to be. Quote:
Basically, naturally aspirated engines have much tighter limitations on how much torque they can produce per litre of displacement. With only so much oxygen, you can only burn so much fuel, which produces only so much pressure. Small gains can be made, but most naturally aspirated engines of the same era are going to be pretty similar in terms of torque/L. For example, while the 3.6L in the Camaro makes about 25% more hp/L than the LT1 does (93 vs 73) there is only about a 5% difference in torque/L (77 vs 73). Also, don't confuse torque with power. You're in electrical, so I'll put it this way: torque is sorta equivalent to current, while rpms are like voltage. Power is the product of both.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#191 | |
![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS 1LE Hyper Blue Join Date: May 2017
Location: Roy Utah
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
I'm not saying a v6 can't accelerate safely on the top end just that it's harder and you really have to work the car to get the performance out of it when compared to how easy it is with a V8 simply because there is torque everywhere. This is only my experience. I stated initially to test drive both and that everyone's milage may vary. I should have stated that I'm specifically talking v6 manual to V8 manual. I imagine an auto would be less of a difference especially with the extra gears. I personally think that matching or being slightly faster than the lane your trying to merge into is the safest way to do so and has the least impact on other drivers so that's why I accelerate before merging over. If someone else prefers to merge and then speed up that's up to them but as the guy you are cutting off or forcing to match your speed it's a bit irritating. My only point was that the low end torque of the V8 allows me to easily accelerate and merge vs when I was in the v6 I'd have to look at how fast I was going to figure out what gear to put the sucker in because I had to be more aggressive with the rpm. If you care about freeway driving and are interested in a manual transmission I would recommend doing a few freeway pulls to find out how the power bands work for you. The limit where I'm at is usually 75 mph but when traffic is moving freely 80 seems to be the norm. Semis and similar vehicles tend to do 70. A 65 to 80-85 pull is fairly common for me when merging. I don't like to hangout in the passing lane and only use it for actual passing unless all lanes are slow do to traffic. Once I've passed I get back over and match the speed of traffic until I get stuck behind a vehicle I would prefer to pass again. Just trying to provide more clarity around my driving style and why I prefer the V8. Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#192 |
|
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,685
|
Lots of controversy here...
If you can afford the v8, buy the v8... If you plan on modifying the car at all and want to race at the drag strip if your budget doesn't allow the v8 and you're thinking you need to buy a v6... Buy a 4 cylinder instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#193 | ||
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS M6 Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Panama City, FL
Posts: 217
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
‘16 Camaro 2SS M6 - RotoFab CAI, Soler Performance TB, E85
8.102 @ 89.85 MPH (bone stock) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#194 |
|
Lovin the growl...
Drives: 2018 2SS Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Rogers, Arkansas
Posts: 926
|
Test drive them all then pick the trim which gives you the biggest smirk, grin, hard-on, ego boost (w/o being a dick) behind the wheel, because unless you have a blossoming money tree rooted in your back yard you're gonna be spending a lot of doe, possibly taking major dings to your credit score and/or even worse, having to wait an extended period of time driving the wrong trim before you can finally rectify your bad choice. Choice wisely grasshopper...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#195 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: LT W/2LT,blue metallic Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: central florida
Posts: 5,043
|
i own a v6 and im happy with it.the loaner 4 cylinder i drove seemed to be making good power though.im not seeing why turbocharging the 6 wouldnt make more power than the 4,although it would cost more to do so.just a matter of cost effectiveness as you would only need to switch wastegates/change the size of the turbo on the 4?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#196 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
Reaching now aren't you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|