12-05-2013, 04:34 PM | #183 | |
Est.1775
Drives: '15 Challenger Hellcat (sold) Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,502
|
Quote:
Not everyone can afford a $60-70k car that is not daily driven capable. GM needs needs to consider this. |
|
12-05-2013, 04:39 PM | #184 |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
What is a Z28 without the slash? For the LS1 Camaros, it was just the base V8. If that's what you mean, then that's the SS.
|
12-05-2013, 05:33 PM | #185 |
Est.1775
Drives: '15 Challenger Hellcat (sold) Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,502
|
|
12-05-2013, 05:38 PM | #186 |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
|
01-23-2014, 01:25 AM | #187 |
Drives: 12 Gen Coupe, 13 4runner limited Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Clayton, NC
Posts: 1
|
I have read through the majority of this thread and I am perplexed at the reaction to a 4 cylinder in the Camaro. I understand the knucklehead idea that american muscle has to be 8 cylinder or flop, and part of my sole still loves to hear an 8 cylinder sing. But truth be told we are one of the last countries that stick to the bigger is better philosophy. Europe has been downsizing from v12's and v10's over the last two decades, and v6 and v8 options down to turbo 4s and 6's. There are a few examples of them moving up, but for the most part mainstream models have down sized.
Another issue that is coming up is the government cafe rules, which state by 2025 the fleet average for each automaker must have a combined mpg of 54.5 mpg. Now that number sounds outlandish but the calculation is a little different, and actually gives credits for a number of reasons, I beleive someone stated it equates to 40.5-42 mpg EPA rating. This is a serious issues, and is one of the many reasons that companies such as Ford are starting to warm up to the idea of a 4 cylinder as the base engine, and turbo sixes in their trucks to replace the v8. That is also the reason why they have started aluminum cabs and beds in their trucks. It is really a race. Another thing that is going to hit all of us, as state legislators are paying attention to what the west is piloting. Both Carbon Emission taxation and mileage tax. Both have been discussed as a way of pushing people to more efficient cars while maintaining precious tax dollars the states are losing as more efficient cars are uses less gas. To avoid this carbon tax, which will be calculated by average carbon emmision per mile, multiplied by the number of miles driven, is already used in a number of countries in Europe. When developing new models these are a few things that have to be considered. And I don't understand why people get so up in arms when a company provides an option such as a turbo 4 mill. You are not required to buy the damn thing. And the fact of the matter is you get more gains, for less, when an engine is already boosted. The ford mill will be 325-350 hp 4 banger, will weigh 100-150 lbs less than the v8 about 50 lbs less than the 6 cylinder. And will be about 2k from 450-500 hp depending on what type of internal it has. And will probably still get 28-32 on the high way. And that is the potential. My Gen Coupe has a larger Turbo on it, its a 4 banger, pumping out 399 hp and 362 lb ft of torque..... and the best thing is I get 31 mpg on the highway as long as im out of boost. I have to be going around 80 to be pushing boost in 6th gear. And that is a small 2.0L mill. It will just be another option.......not the end of the damn world. |
01-23-2014, 01:40 AM | #188 | |
I Use Three Pedals
Drives: 2011 VR M6 Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 793
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
01-23-2014, 09:34 AM | #189 | |
Dances With Mustangs
|
Quote:
__________________
Blue Angel is here!! 1SS/RS LS3 M6 IBM |
|
01-23-2014, 11:37 AM | #190 |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
Why do I not like a 4 banger in a Camaro? Not because of what it is but because of what it represents. It means the government is winning and forcing everything towards the ultra efficient side of things. Performance cars will become a luxury that most will not be able to afford.
|
01-23-2014, 11:53 AM | #191 | |
Drives: 2018 GT350 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 2,716
|
Quote:
Oh..Genesis Coupe...what a piece of horse shit. I had one of the first 2010 Mirabeau Blue 3.8 Track Models, and that car was so much trouble and frustration and subpar manufacturing. Couldn't sell it fast enough... Next time, leave that part out.
__________________
Off to the Dark Side
|
|
01-23-2014, 12:41 PM | #192 |
Turning wrenches
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS By Berger 11BC21 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,154
|
The people who wanted a turbo 4cylinder think they'll save money on gas, you know you need to run premium right? Please no turbo 4 cylinder in a muscle car ever
__________________
Sold-2006 Pontiac GTO
M6 1 of 475 353rwhp 353rwtq Sold-2000 Camaro SS A4 Hardtop #867 of 8913 1 of 103 Bright Rally Red Hardtop SS A4 in 2000 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS M6 By Berger #11BC21 |
01-23-2014, 01:39 PM | #193 | |
Drives: 2011 ss Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: ft morgan
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
Just so long as we never have to see the 2.5 I-4 of those early 3rd gens I am ok |
|
01-23-2014, 06:11 PM | #194 |
Founder - Michigan FBody
Drives: 1994 Camaro LT1, 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Haven, MI
Posts: 2,598
|
What's the point of this thread? Scott has already stated in other threads (if not this one too) that Al was misquoted...
If a 4-banger makes the business case for the 6th gen that much more attractive to GM, I welcome the option. It doesn't mean I have to buy a 4-banger, it doesn't mean anyone of us has to buy a 4-banger. It just adds an option. If having a 4-banger in there makes a thousand more people buy a Camaro to get a taste of what the Camaro is all about, why not? How many v6 sales have resulted in people upgrading to the SS model? We see those threads on here every single day. That's two vehicles sold in GM's book.
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 - "Zooma"
1994 Camaro LT1 A4 - "Red Alert" - v6-to-LT1 Swapped Cruiser; Cammed, Stalled, Enjoyed "Gone But Not Forgotten" 2016 Camaro 1LT A8 - "Elmo" 2014 Camaro 1LT M6 - "Cherry Bomb" 2012 Camaro 1LS M6 - "Clifford" Michigan FBody Association http://www.mifbody.com/ |
01-23-2014, 07:26 PM | #195 |
Drives: Camaro's, always have, always will. Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Home of the brave
Posts: 4,851
|
...death before dishonor....so shall it be for the Camaro. But the MSRP for high performance is nearing the roof. If you see something you like now, such as a SS, 1LE or ZL1...you may consider making a move. The Z/28 is all that and more but exhorbitant in price for the mainstream consumer.
__________________
In Scott We Trust...all others must show proof.
|
01-25-2014, 05:40 PM | #196 |
Drives: 2013 SW 2LT/RS LFX/AY6 Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,741
|
Everyone against a Turbo I4 Camaro needs to go out and drive a Turbo I4 sports car / luxury import (say a properly tuned, bolt on VW). They are ridiculously fun and equally good on gas, while maintaining plenty of power with the reduced weight compared to an identical car will a larger engine. A ~320hp ~350ftlb twin scroll turbo I4 Camaro would be cheap and would help keep the Camaro alive when the gas mileage standards change.
__________________
K&N CAI, 1LE Strut Tower Brace, Elite Engineering Catch Can and Clean Side Separator, Apex Scoop w/ Washer Relocation Kit, CTS Front Calipers and Rotors, JacFab Ported Intake Manifold, JacFab Intake Manifold Spacer, 80mm Overkill Throttle Body, SS Brake Lines, Ideal Garage Master Cylinder, Monster Twin Disc Clutch, NPP Retrofit w/ Magnaflow Resonated X, ARH Catless Downpipes, JRE Built 3.45 Diff, 1LE Axles, 1LE Hubs, Overkill Tuned, BMR Anti Wheel-hop Kit Stage I, ACS TL1 Hood Insert, ZL1 Spoiler
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|