Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Griffin Motorsports


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2017, 05:05 PM   #155
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro5 View Post
So you believe they're running the test mules around to test new fascias?

80% chance of more power.
I would say less than 10% chance of more power. GM has a long history of no power bumps on the mainstream v8's for the camaro and Corvette. Other than the last LS6 (which at the time was a specialty engine, over 15 years ago), I really can't remember the last time they did it.

I'm sure they are just testing the facial or other minor adjustments.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 05:09 PM   #156
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: X-15 Velocipede
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke.Malvo View Post
I would say less than 10% chance of more power. GM has a long history of no power bumps on the mainstream v8's for the camaro and Corvette. Other than the last LS6 (which at the time was a specialty engine, over 15 years ago), I really can't remember the last time they did it.

I'm sure they are just testing the facial or other minor adjustments.
What kind of tests are they running on fascias? NONE

Maybe just riding around for the fun of it, but not testing fascias

I'll adjust to 70% and time will tell.
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 05:11 PM   #157
Zeke.Malvo

 
Zeke.Malvo's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Mustang MaCh1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: SJ
Posts: 835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
Yes, yes they absolutely would be driving cars around for the new fascia. Simply impacts to cooling alone would have them do that.

There will likely be a bunch of changes that cause the need for prototypes to be built and tested.

Does not mean there won't be an engine or engine upgrade in power. GM has rarely done that. Maybe a 5 or 10 hp gain, but there were no bumps that I recall for the LS3 in the Corvette or Camaro.

Only time will tell.
+1

There was no update on the LS3, LS2, LS1, and LT1. Was there an update on the old 350's or 305's from '92 or older? That's over a quarter century of no power bumps AT LEAST.
__________________
1969 Pro-Touring MaCh 1 - CHP 427w 10.8 comp - 3140 lbs. - 460 rwhp / 490 rwtq
T56 Magnum || 14" 6 piston front / 13" 4 piston rear Wilwood brakes || Hydraulic clutch || 9" Detroit Locker || TCP Coilovers || Forgeline Wheels 18x10 275/35 front, 19x12 325/30 rear
Zeke.Malvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 05:16 PM   #158
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: X-15 Velocipede
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
Yes, yes they absolutely would be driving cars around for the new fascia. Simply impacts to cooling alone would have them do that.

There will likely be a bunch of changes that cause the need for prototypes to be built and tested.

Does not mean there won't be an engine or engine upgrade in power. GM has rarely done that. Maybe a 5 or 10 hp gain, but there were no bumps that I recall for the LS3 in the Corvette or Camaro.

Only time will tell.
They're not testing the airflow or cooling with all that camouflage covering the entire front fascia except some vent holes.

HP - maybe wishful thinking - Maybe the new GM will do something new.

camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 05:30 PM   #159
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke.Malvo View Post
I would say less than 10% chance of more power. GM has a long history of no power bumps on the mainstream v8's for the camaro and Corvette. Other than the last LS6 (which at the time was a specialty engine, over 15 years ago), I really can't remember the last time they did it.

I'm sure they are just testing the facial or other minor adjustments.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke.Malvo View Post
+1

There was no update on the LS3, LS2, LS1, and LT1. Was there an update on the old 350's or 305's from '92 or older? That's over a quarter century of no power bumps AT LEAST.
The LS1s in '01 changed to the LS6 intake, different cam and some other small changes. While there was no change in rating (pre SAE testing and Corvette protection era) those engines definitely made more power. There were continuous updates to engines and output during the 3rd gen. The 4th gen saw the most continuity but also saw a huge change in engines from LT1 to LS1. So there definitely is history of refreshes with power changes.

But honestly everything before the 5th gen was a very different GM and a different market domestic market. The 5th gen saw now power bumps but there also wasn't much motivation since the car was doing well and more importantly the power output on the base C6 was higher than the Mustang the entire gen. That is the key thing to consider now. This gen is the first to see the Camaro/Vette on equal power ratings.

If the '18 Mustang GT sees a bump past the 455hp rating of the base Vette, that's an entirely different story for GM. Not in the last 3 or 4 generations has the entry V8 Mustang had the same or more power than the Vette. I can guarantee that GM would not let that happen for long. It may mean a 5 hp bump or something small, but the Vette's status requires it not be second. I mean look at the separate ratings for NPP in the C6 and C7. The real question would be would it trickle down to the Camaro. Which with the Camaro team of today, I would say yes.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 05:37 PM   #160
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro5 View Post
They're not testing the airflow or cooling with all that camouflage covering the entire front fascia except some vent holes.

HP - maybe wishful thinking - Maybe the new GM will do something new.

The camo is set up to a) replicate cooling and b) hide the change. Actually a lot of engineering goes into the camo for both of those reasons. You should have seen what Dave Hill did on the C6 to disguise the cars shorter overhangs compared to the C5.

You are correct that specific cooing tests wouldn't be done with camo. But for all of the evaluations they are doing, cooing is one of the reasons you would build prototypes for testing.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 05:46 PM   #161
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,578
That camo is interesting....I would think it's either hiding a big change or virtually no change at all....The other skin tight type camo seemed to rely just on the optical illusion of the design pattern to "hide" something....

My guess: it will be a "drastic" refresh change in looks for in the front and rear clip....Using the old style camo would make it too easy to tell one way or the other...
90503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 08:32 PM   #162
Martinjlm
Retired fr GM + SP Global
 
Martinjlm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro Fifty SS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
Yes, yes they absolutely would be driving cars around for the new fascia. Simply impacts to cooling alone would have them do that.

There will likely be a bunch of changes that cause the need for prototypes to be built and tested.

Does not mean there won't be an engine or engine upgrade in power.
GM has rarely done that. Maybe a 5 or 10 hp gain, but there were no bumps that I recall for the LS3 in the Corvette or Camaro.

Only time will tell.
Exactly this ^^^.

As for year to year bumps, that has happened. I am speaking specifically of Corvette or Camaro, but in general there have been modest hp bumps in the fairly recent past.

Some from exhaust tuning, some from differences in injection technology, some from other modest content tweaks that don't drive an RPO code change. I can somewhat recall minor changes in hp on 3.6L DOHC as well as the L850 / LGE families of 4-cylinder engines. We did it all the time on diesel engines.

I would not be surprised to see a minor bump once Ford makes the final Mustang GT numbers official.
__________________
2017 CAMARO FIFTY SS CONVERTIBLE
A8 | MRC | NPP | Nav | HUD | GM Performance CAI | Tony Mamo LT1 V2 Ported TB | Kooks 1-7/8” LT Headers | FlexFuel Tune | Thinkware Q800 Pro front and rear dash cam | Charcoal Tint for Taillights and 3rd Brakelight | Orange and Carbon Fiber Bowties | 1LE Wheels in Gunmetal Gray | Carbon Fiber Interior Overlays | Novistretch bra and mirror covers | Tow hitch for bicycle rack |


Martinjlm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 10:25 PM   #163
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: X-15 Velocipede
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,630
This is what I'm talking about - a 20+ HP bump to keep ahead of mustang gt:


Quote:
The gear shown is “4”, while the digital speedometer reads “55”. It’s thought those numbers represent 455 hp for the reworked Coyote V8 engine.

A 20 hp bump seems doable, too, as the Mustang GT receives a new direct injection system and factory quad-tip exhaust. Ford has remained quiet on the matter, but it seems the pony car wars are heating up once again.

Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2017/01/...#ixzz4fnGQ3vE3
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 10:31 PM   #164
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: X-15 Velocipede
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
The camo is set up to a) replicate cooling and b) hide the change. Actually a lot of engineering goes into the camo for both of those reasons. You should have seen what Dave Hill did on the C6 to disguise the cars shorter overhangs compared to the C5.

You are correct that specific cooing tests wouldn't be done with camo. But for all of the evaluations they are doing, cooing is one of the reasons you would build prototypes for testing.
That's interesting that those seemingly random camo details are aero engineered.

Waiting for more pics and speculation now.
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 10:54 PM   #165
doc7000

 
Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lomita,CA
Posts: 806
On power gains some are looking at the Camaro in a vacuum, they will make changes/tweaks based on the perceived need to make them.

Ford has dropped the V-6 engine and will only offer the EB 2.3 as the non V-8 engine, however it doesn't seem as though this engine has gotten a power boost. Because of this I don't think there is really a need to boost I-4 or V-6 power except maybe if Cadillac needs to boost those engines up. Really only the V-8 might need a boost in power with the Mustang GT going up in power.
doc7000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2017, 11:59 PM   #166
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro5 View Post
This is what I'm talking about - a 20+ HP bump to keep ahead of mustang gt:





Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2017/01/...#ixzz4fnGQ3vE3
GM doesn't care what kind of power the Mustang is making, or did you forget about the ZL1 vs GT500? They have already said they have no plans to beat the Hellcat power rating with the Camaro.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 09:15 AM   #167
IMadeYouReadThis

 
IMadeYouReadThis's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Camaro SS 6M / 11 GMC Sierra
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,096
The bottom line is the car is expensive and it's not selling as well as General Motors would like I can't wait to get my RS V6 should be in within another week or two but I don't see any on the road around me and I work at the GM Oshawa plant I drive back and forth on the 401 I hardly ever see one of these new Camaros it's just unfortunately not selling hopefully with whatever refresh they do it will ignite the public into wanting to purchase the Camaro again
IMadeYouReadThis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2017, 09:40 AM   #168
IOMike

 
Drives: 2022 F150, 87 Monte Carlo
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: MN
Posts: 1,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
Sorry but I have to vote no.
I do believe they could do a better job than those two. The current rear just...sucks. The SS 1LE spoiler does help, but it needs more.
IOMike is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.