10-28-2015, 05:10 PM | #1 |
Drives: 08 Accord V6/M6 / 04 Canyon Z71 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,078
|
Official MPG Ratings
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Power...ro&srchtyp=ymm
Looks like the official ratings are starting to get posted. V8 Automatic: 17 city / 28 hwy / 20 combined http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find....n=sbs&id=37097 V8 Manual: 16 city / 25 hwy / 19 combined http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find....n=sbs&id=37098 V6 Automatic: 19 city / 28 hwy / 23 combined http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find....n=sbs&id=37137 V6 Manual: 18 city / 27 hwy / 21 combined http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find....n=sbs&id=37073 Edit for 4cyl ratings: 4cyl Automatic: 22 city / 31 hwy / 25 combined http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find....n=sbs&id=37248 4cyl Manual: 21 city / 30 hwy / 24 combined http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find....n=sbs&id=37249 Last edited by BahamaTodd; 03-05-2016 at 09:13 PM. |
10-28-2015, 05:13 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 195
|
What the gas mileage on the ss auto?
__________________
2016 Camaro 2SS - Bright Yellow
Ordered on 9/22 Built on 11/10 Delivered on 12/15/15 Instagram: luiscarrillo91 |
10-28-2015, 05:13 PM | #3 |
Drives: 08 Accord V6/M6 / 04 Canyon Z71 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,078
|
So for the V6 manual, compared to the 5th gen, the city and combined ratings are up 1 mpg, but the hwy is down 1 mpg. I guess we'll see better improvements with the autos and AFM.
|
10-28-2015, 05:14 PM | #4 |
Drives: 08 Accord V6/M6 / 04 Canyon Z71 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,078
|
|
10-28-2015, 05:14 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 195
|
Oh okay cool. I saw an article earlier that is says 17/28 for auto i feel like that's too good to be true
__________________
2016 Camaro 2SS - Bright Yellow
Ordered on 9/22 Built on 11/10 Delivered on 12/15/15 Instagram: luiscarrillo91 |
10-28-2015, 05:35 PM | #6 |
Drives: '10 CGM 2SS/RS 6M Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,032
|
So that's what a lighter, more powerful car does in terms of MPGs huh? It is crazy that manufacturers have to scrape and scrap around to get one more mile per gallon of gas! the 2015 auto V6 was rated @30mpg hwy so I guess we will see when its comes out.
|
10-28-2015, 05:43 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro convertible 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,077
|
I wonder why they put a pic of the gen 5 instead of the gen 6? Wrong mpg?
|
10-28-2015, 06:52 PM | #8 |
Sales Manager for Chevy
Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313
|
This is not official.
|
10-28-2015, 07:00 PM | #9 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: VA
Posts: 240
|
Not at all official
|
10-28-2015, 07:09 PM | #10 |
Moderator.ca
|
If its not official, how did it end up on the EPA's website?
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
10-28-2015, 07:11 PM | #11 |
Lethal Camaro
Drives: 16 2SS, 71 Std, Suburban RTS Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 3,855
|
The Truth!
__________________
|
10-28-2015, 07:21 PM | #12 |
Sales Manager for Chevy
Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313
|
|
10-28-2015, 07:34 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
|
i thought it got better by 1MPG, not worse?
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod
|
10-28-2015, 08:02 PM | #14 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6 Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
|
Considering the '16 ATS with 3.6/8spd is rated at 20/30, these #s are a little disappointing. It will be interesting to see if the camaro with 8A matches the ATS.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Power...TS&srchtyp=ymm |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|