Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-18-2024, 07:24 PM   #1
Bill2017SS
 
Drives: chevy camaro ss
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Florida
Posts: 8
Thinking about getting a Magnuson 2650R, which one?

I thought Layno15's setup was almost the perfect setup. Which version of the Magnuson supercharger should I get? The complete LT1 version or the much cheaper LT4 version? The car is a 2023 SS. I also already have the hp tuners MPI2. I have headers and exhaust that are currently on my 2017.

Are the 103mm snout and throttle body worth adding? I don't think Layno15 has them. Seems like his car made more than enough power.

Thanks
Bill2017SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 07:38 PM   #2
Joshinator99
Moderator
 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill2017SS View Post
I thought Layno15's setup was almost the perfect setup. Which version of the Magnuson supercharger should I get? The complete LT1 version or the much cheaper LT4 version? The car is a 2023 SS. I also already have the hp tuners MPI2. I have headers and exhaust that are currently on my 2017.

Are the 103mm snout and throttle body worth adding? I don't think Layno15 has them. Seems like his car made more than enough power.

Thanks
If you have an SS, you need the LT1 version. LT4 version won’t come with heat exchangers, pump, etc which is a problem since you don’t already have those like the ZL1 does.

What is your power goal…? It’s always the starting point.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2024, 10:17 PM   #3
Bill2017SS
 
Drives: chevy camaro ss
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Florida
Posts: 8
Oh, ok thanks. I wasn't really sure what all the differences were. I was thinking 700ish wheel. I also live in south Florida where it is hot a lot.
Bill2017SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2024, 07:12 AM   #4
Joshinator99
Moderator
 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill2017SS View Post
Oh, ok thanks. I wasn't really sure what all the differences were. I was thinking 700ish wheel. I also live in south Florida where it is hot a lot.
A big part of laynlo15’s build was being able to run E85. At a minimum, add LT4 in tank pump w/JMS voltage booster, LT4 HPFP, and LT4 injectors so that you can run some E. It will help your stock LT1 bottom end live a lot longer, not to mention make a lot more power.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2024, 07:58 AM   #5
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,641
Laynlo had a 2300 on his last car. You are going to need more than LT4 fuel system to run any amount of E @ 700whp. With a stock cam you will need +30's, Big Bore HPFP, JMS booster for you low side pump which should already be a LT4. Then you will be able to run E50-60. Or do Port injection.
__________________

2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2024, 11:20 AM   #6
Bill2017SS
 
Drives: chevy camaro ss
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Florida
Posts: 8
I forgot that Laynlo had a couple builds. Yes I was referring the the last or the 2300 build that made 707.
I thought the port injection was the most budget friendly and worked well. Is that no longer the case?
I believe E85 is available locally. Could the smooth boost (I think that was what it was called) be used to keep hp lower, maybe 600 for running pump gas then when the need arises add E85 and turn off smooth boost to reach the higher hp level?
Bill2017SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2024, 04:04 PM   #7
Joshinator99
Moderator
 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill2017SS View Post
I forgot that Laynlo had a couple builds. Yes I was referring the the last or the 2300 build that made 707.
I thought the port injection was the most budget friendly and worked well. Is that no longer the case?
I believe E85 is available locally. Could the smooth boost (I think that was what it was called) be used to keep hp lower, maybe 600 for running pump gas then when the need arises add E85 and turn off smooth boost to reach the higher hp level?
Port injection will definitely cover your fueling needs but you still need a low side to support the port injection (plus your stock DI fueling).

Smoothboost can be very helpful but seems like a good amount of extra complexity for 700 WHP.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2024, 04:06 PM   #8
James Montigny
 
James Montigny's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Raymore, MO
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill2017SS View Post
I forgot that Laynlo had a couple builds. Yes I was referring the the last or the 2300 build that made 707.
I thought the port injection was the most budget friendly and worked well. Is that no longer the case?
I believe E85 is available locally. Could the smooth boost (I think that was what it was called) be used to keep hp lower, maybe 600 for running pump gas then when the need arises add E85 and turn off smooth boost to reach the higher hp level?
700 is stretching the limits of the LT4 injectors and HPFP
I was making 670 with heads/cam/2650 @ 6psi and used an aux pump.
It ran well on 93 or e85.
That's really as far as I wanted to go with a stock bottom end LT1

To run 13psi, I had a forged bottom end installed, then added meth for safety and a dual in tank system to make 864.
To get that beyond 15psi (~900rwhp), we'd need larger injectors and a bigger HPFP or a plate system to keep it fueled. Also, more ribs to prevent slipping.
__________________
James Montigny
2017 Camaro 2SS A8 - Krypton Green
Magnuson 2650 @ 13psi, Forged TSP Rods/Pistons, TSP Ported Heads, BTR PD Cam, Aeromotive Low Side, DSX Flex, LT4 HPFP, 103mm TB, Big Gulp, Meth.
Built by Killer Performance, Tuned by Justune.
James Montigny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2024, 08:53 PM   #9
Bill2017SS
 
Drives: chevy camaro ss
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Florida
Posts: 8
Thanks again. I e-mailed Toohighpsi and they also said that I would need low side support which is usually done by adding an auxiliary fuel pump (in addition to the plates/controller/plate injectors). They also said auxiliary pump can be controlled by the reflex controller.

At this point I am not very familiar with how these fuel systems work but is there a separate fuel pump for the high pressure and low pressure.

Any suggestions as to which auxiliary pump?

Thanks
Bill2017SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2024, 08:14 AM   #10
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,641
There are some dual drop-in tank solutions now that appear to be working well. Both DSX and Katech offer them. Or you can do the DSX aux kit if you desire. Either will work but the in-tank setup is a more "OEM" solution...no need to tap a hole in the tank, and you don't have to worry about running the car hard with a 1/4 tank of fuel and starving the fuel system. Mainly an issue for road course stuff.
__________________

2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2024, 08:23 PM   #11
Bill2017SS
 
Drives: chevy camaro ss
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Florida
Posts: 8
Are you referring to the Katech Goliath pump and the DSX dual in tank pump set up. I saw something about Katech having a dual pump setup but there was an issue with the supplier. The Katech Goliath is $3,000 and the DSX is $2,000. This stuff sure adds up? Kind of crazy. I saw there was a Deatschwerks – X2 kit? Would that work. So with the port injection and no low pressure support do you think you could safely make 625ish rwhp? What would the addition of these pumps allow you to safely make? Thanks
Bill2017SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2024, 08:43 PM   #12
WiggyB
 
WiggyB's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Camaro 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: NC
Posts: 408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill2017SS View Post
Are you referring to the Katech Goliath pump and the DSX dual in tank pump set up. I saw something about Katech having a dual pump setup but there was an issue with the supplier. The Katech Goliath is $3,000 and the DSX is $2,000. This stuff sure adds up? Kind of crazy. I saw there was a Deatschwerks – X2 kit? Would that work. So with the port injection and no low pressure support do you think you could safely make 625ish rwhp? What would the addition of these pumps allow you to safely make? Thanks
You should be able to do that with just complete LT4 fueling and some mixture of E. You could do a JMS BAP on there with the current fuel setup and be good too.
__________________
d1sc w/ stage 2 intercooler, Lt4 fueling, JMS BAP, lt2 intake, mamo ptb, kooks 1/78 longtube headers w/ h/f cats, alky meth kit, thpsi port injection

Last edited by WiggyB; 12-21-2024 at 08:53 PM.
WiggyB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2024, 12:19 AM   #13
Patriot Motorsports USA
 
Patriot Motorsports USA's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 ZLE, C5 Z06 6.0L Procharged
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 574
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Montigny View Post
700 is stretching the limits of the LT4 injectors and HPFP
I was making 670 with heads/cam/2650 @ 6psi and used an aux pump.
It ran well on 93 or e85.
That's really as far as I wanted to go with a stock bottom end LT1

To run 13psi, I had a forged bottom end installed, then added meth for safety and a dual in tank system to make 864.
To get that beyond 15psi (~900rwhp), we'd need larger injectors and a bigger HPFP or a plate system to keep it fueled. Also, more ribs to prevent slipping.
Wouldn't it be cheaper to sell the SS and just buy a ZL1?
Patriot Motorsports USA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2024, 09:54 AM   #14
Bill2017SS
 
Drives: chevy camaro ss
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Florida
Posts: 8
Thanks for all the help. Kind of bummed out about needing the fuel pump on top of everything else.

I did some searches so I am not as clueless about the fuel systems and options. A lot of the same people responding to this thread provided some really good information on previous threads. The stock system does seem pretty capable especially on an NA build. Thought about a an NA build but the drivability is always a huge factor.

Maybe do the supercharger and port injection for a more modest setup and add a pump down the road.

I thought about the ZL1 but had a hard time justifying paying that much for a car. They are definately nice cars though. On top of that to race it. Seems like the ZL1 has the same fueling issues once you go beyond a certain point.
Bill2017SS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.