Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2018, 08:07 AM   #71
NW-99SS

 
Drives: 1999 Camaro SS M6 - SBE LS1
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 1,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by smokinzx14r View Post
Anyone up for a real test ? Someone with a Stock GT A10 race me with my stock SS A8 at BMP in FL .. 4 runs , two in each lane .. ..Winner is the one with the Best ET , NOT the one that got there first , we are racing the clocks ..

These cars need to be 100% stock... But to take the crying out of it like "I spun or I would have won shit " Both cars will use a drag radial tire .. Same size 305/45/17 on the rear .. Front tires and rims will be stock.. Pump 93 gas from the same gas station close to the track .. Driver weights need to be within a few pounds each other ..

I'm good with anyone bringing a well known tuner to check both cars for a tune so no cheating ..

Anyone up for it lets do it !! We can also Video the hole thing so everyone can see it was a fare test ..

You can bring a pro driver if you want ..I will be driving my own car ..
I absolutely agree and support this.
__________________
1999 Camaro SS 6M - SBE LS1
1994 Camaro Z28 6M - Golen 383 HT
1963 Corvette GrandSport - ZZ502 4M
2017 Denali 1500 6.2
2017 Yukon Denali 6.2
NW-99SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2018, 10:07 AM   #72
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
To be fair...."same day, same track!"

Is the cry of both sides when a test doesn't go their way...happened in the 5th Gen days too on both sides
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2018, 11:15 AM   #73
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
Still trying to count Evan's run ain't ya?? No dice bro. BTW, which of the two is faster between the manual Mustangs and the manual Camaros? Just curious. Why does the GT have to be optioned a specific way to get those times out? And how long did it take for them to get this fast? And what kind of overhaul did it take? LOL, they had to completely re-do an already re-done platform after only 3MYs just to keep up and that is pathetic. Nobody is impressed with that shit.
Evans’s run was just the trigger that had you claiming ringer, pro driver, track rental, then Cars.com did it and you keep trying to block it out like it will go away.

Why does the Mustang need to optioned a certain way? Because Ford offers the Mustang with a different set of option packages vs the Camaro that allow for a cheaper base car, I assumed you smart enough to figure that out.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 09:54 AM   #74
jmackisback
 
jmackisback's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 154
Huge lol @ claiming new Crustangs are 11.9-12.1 cars. Edmunds mid-high 12 was way more realistic.
__________________

1987 Camaro V6
1988 Camaro IROC Z
1993 Camaro Z28
1999 Camaro SS
2017 Camaro SS
jmackisback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 02:12 PM   #75
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
Evans’s run was just the trigger that had you claiming ringer, pro driver, track rental, then Cars.com did it and you keep trying to block it out like it will go away.

Why does the Mustang need to optioned a certain way? Because Ford offers the Mustang with a different set of option packages vs the Camaro that allow for a cheaper base car, I assumed you smart enough to figure that out.
Well what actually happened is that I DID call out Evan's run because it was bullshit. There was a lot of shady shit that went on surrounding his run and him getting that specific Mustang. On top of the other testers that couldn't do better than a mid 12. So that says a lot. I didn't count his run then and I still don't count it now. So get over it. However I also DID give the Mustang it's credit when the other more official testers ran whatever the hell they ran. I didn't block it like you wanna pretend I did. I completely acknowledged it. And you know this because you and your buddies sat here talking shit the whole time. For the record, at least I never went back on any of my statements. And secondly, I predicted what it would run out the gate and that is exactly what it did. But from the very start, even if the Mustang did get to be faster than the Camaro, it means nothing because it took them 3 MYs and a complete re-do of the entire car to get to this point. From the very start I said that at this point there is nothing that Ford can do that will ever make me respect the S550 GT. It started off as garbage and they sold them for dirt-ass cheap then 3 years later had to do what they should have done from the start. So that thing can run an 11.8 officially and I'll still think it's a POS. Now the next Gen, I'll see what they do. But for now it does not impress me one bit.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 02:50 PM   #76
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
Well what actually happened is that I DID call out Evan's run because it was bullshit. There was a lot of shady shit that went on surrounding his run and him getting that specific Mustang. On top of the other testers that couldn't do better than a mid 12. So that says a lot. I didn't count his run then and I still don't count it now. So get over it. However I also DID give the Mustang it's credit when the other more official testers ran whatever the hell they ran. I didn't block it like you wanna pretend I did. I completely acknowledged it. And you know this because you and your buddies sat here talking shit the whole time. For the record, at least I never went back on any of my statements. And secondly, I predicted what it would run out the gate and that is exactly what it did. But from the very start, even if the Mustang did get to be faster than the Camaro, it means nothing because it took them 3 MYs and a complete re-do of the entire car to get to this point. From the very start I said that at this point there is nothing that Ford can do that will ever make me respect the S550 GT. It started off as garbage and they sold them for dirt-ass cheap then 3 years later had to do what they should have done from the start. So that thing can run an 11.8 officially and I'll still think it's a POS. Now the next Gen, I'll see what they do. But for now it does not impress me one bit.
GTFO with your circle talking nonsense and nobody gives **** what you're impressed by so no need to include it in every post you make.

you said...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
Still trying to count Evan's run ain't ya?? No dice bro.
in response to Newmoon stating that publications have gone 11's in the Mustang and haven't been able to in the Camaro. So you either forgot about Cars.com or you have a mental block. No need to type 200 words to try to save face.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 04:39 PM   #77
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
GTFO with your circle talking nonsense and nobody gives **** what you're impressed by so no need to include it in every post you make.

you said...

in response to Newmoon stating that publications have gone 11's in the Mustang and haven't been able to in the Camaro. So you either forgot about Cars.com or you have a mental block. No need to type 200 words to try to save face.
And you're either a straight up troll or a complete liar. Both are fitting and typical considering what you drive. I spelled it out for you because you have a history of conveniently forgetting or trying to act like you forgot or denying or making up stuff that people said. What I said is EXACTLY how those conversations went when they occurred. And in case you forgot or are again trying to lie about it, here is what you just said "Evans’s run was just the trigger that had you claiming ringer, pro driver, track rental, then Cars.com did it and you keep trying to block it out like it will go away."

No, I am not impressed by the GT and I'll say it as often as I want. No matter how many videos get posted about GTs doing whatever "stock with only..." whatever, it won't impress me. 1, because I haven't seen any of them at my track running anywhere close to these times with those mods as you and these YT videos claim. And I live in the northeast where temps are ideal at this time of year. And 2, because it still took them forever to get this far when everyone else (Dodge and Chevy) had cars this fast for a long time now. So they're straight up the last to get to the party and had to benchmark the Camaro to get there because Lord knows they wouldn't have done it on their own since the 15 GT was such a damn flop.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 05:02 PM   #78
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Post #71

...I'm making it up and a liar
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 06:30 PM   #79
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
By last count I think 5 reviews have either high 11s or low 12s for the A10 GT, yet it's a mid 12 second ride. But the Camaro that has a single 12.2 as it's best but we are to consider it a 11 sec ride. The denial is so strong it almost borders on delusional at this point.

Time to face reality. The SS is no longer the fastest of the big three, in fact it will soon be the slowest of the 3 when the 19 Scatpack 1320 arrives shortly.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 07:07 PM   #80
Snowblind

 
Snowblind's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS / '05 SRT10 Ram / '65 bu
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philthy
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
By last count I think 5 reviews have either high 11s or low 12s for the A10 GT, yet it's a mid 12 second ride. But the Camaro that has a single 12.2 as it's best but we are to consider it a 11 sec ride. The denial is so strong it almost borders on delusional at this point.

Time to face reality. The SS is no longer the fastest of the big three, in fact it will soon be the slowest of the 3 when the 19 Scatpack 1320 arrives shortly.
It's hard to take magazine racers seriously.

Signed,
The quickest bolt-on car of all the Big 3 in the last 2 years.
__________________
H/C SBE 9.80@140 powered by Texas Speed
Snowblind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 08:28 PM   #81
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowblind View Post
Signed,
The 2nd quickest bolt-on car of all the Big 3 in the last 2 years.
Fixed that for you.

Your car is flying Snowblind, but RBS550 has been faster with bolt-ons at 10.36@129.

Congrats on the new C6G record.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2018, 09:46 PM   #82
Snowblind

 
Snowblind's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS / '05 SRT10 Ram / '65 bu
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philthy
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
Fixed that for you.

Your car is flying Snowblind, but RBS550 has been faster with bolt-ons at 10.36@129.

Congrats on the new C6G record.
Appreciate the kind words. Isn't RBS a 2015 car ? Seeing as my car wasn't built yet, I chose my words carefully but maybe I wasn't being clear enough.
__________________
H/C SBE 9.80@140 powered by Texas Speed
Snowblind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2018, 03:52 AM   #83
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
Post #71

...I'm making it up and a liar
And a troll but who's counting...??
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
By last count I think 5 reviews have either high 11s or low 12s for the A10 GT, yet it's a mid 12 second ride. But the Camaro that has a single 12.2 as it's best but we are to consider it a 11 sec ride. The denial is so strong it almost borders on delusional at this point.
Cool story bro.
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
Time to face reality. The SS is no longer the fastest of the big three, in fact it will soon be the slowest of the 3 when the 19 Scatpack 1320 arrives shortly.
You sure about that homes??

Here's a question. Under $400K+, what does Ford have available that can match the ZL1, ZL1 1LE, and the ZR1 in any performance category? What does Ford have that can match the Hellcat, Redeye, and Demon in the quarter mile bone stock and under $400K+? Awaiting your bullshit answer because I know you're not gonna admit that they have absolutely nothing.

The SS doesn't have to be the fastest. They kicked the GT's ass for a long time now. It wasn't even a driver's race. Now the GT barely eeks out a win after a major re-design, lol!! Congrats bro. Chevy is still on top as far as overall performance. And as of right now, even if the GT can beat the SS, the Mustang itself is still the slowest of the Big Three just like they've been for quite a while and will be until the GT500 comes out which will be a short lived victory. So enjoy your little win that took forever to get to. Nobody cares. When it turns around again, GM will kick Ford's ass once more leaving them scrounging to make the GT competitive again.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2018, 05:27 AM   #84
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
And a troll but who's counting...??

Cool story bro.

You sure about that homes??

Here's a question. Under $400K+, what does Ford have available that can match the ZL1, ZL1 1LE, and the ZR1 in any performance category? What does Ford have that can match the Hellcat, Redeye, and Demon in the quarter mile bone stock and under $400K+? Awaiting your bullshit answer because I know you're not gonna admit that they have absolutely nothing.

The SS doesn't have to be the fastest. They kicked the GT's ass for a long time now. It wasn't even a driver's race. Now the GT barely eeks out a win after a major re-design, lol!! Congrats bro. Chevy is still on top as far as overall performance. And as of right now, even if the GT can beat the SS, the Mustang itself is still the slowest of the Big Three just like they've been for quite a while and will be until the GT500 comes out which will be a short lived victory. So enjoy your little win that took forever to get to. Nobody cares. When it turns around again, GM will kick Ford's ass once more leaving them scrounging to make the GT competitive again.
Well the SS has kicked the GTs ass for the past 2 years but got its ass kicked the 4 years prior. Who knows maybe the A10 SS will run better if not when is the next update for the SS? And yes you are correct Ford has failed by not having an answer to the ZL1 and Hellcat, never mind the Demon and ZL1E.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.