09-28-2017, 08:39 AM | #141 | |
Chick Racer
Drives: 2017 50th 2SS Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: H-Town
Posts: 789
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
10-04-2017, 06:46 AM | #142 |
Drives: 2002 Pontiac T/Am, 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 151
|
Any idea if I will lose any clearance to the strut tower with this suspension? I have a '16 (so I'm waiting on the calibration update anyways) but I have 19x10 wheels with +25 offset... they are super close as it is. I remember reading that 1LE's had more clearance in that area anyways to allow for more severe track camber.
I just don't want to run any spacers.... haha. |
11-26-2017, 01:08 PM | #143 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: WA
Posts: 132
|
Any updates on the calibration for 2016 yet?
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk |
12-01-2017, 07:16 PM | #144 | |
Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
|
Quote:
Or drop another load of change and get the DSC controller, which will work with this kit. |
|
12-02-2017, 11:07 AM | #145 | |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: WA
Posts: 132
|
Quote:
DSC sounds great at first, but they don't even have a forum. Their "forum" link takes you to a thread on a Porsche forum. I'm sure the 911 guys would love Camaro owners crashing their thread to discuss Camaro chassis tuning. The DSC either needs some great out-of-the-box tune options or a better community, imo. Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk |
|
12-02-2017, 06:54 PM | #146 |
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro SS Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 721
|
HP Tuners or EFI Live do not provide an 'outta the box' tune. Yes they better support in place, but they been around longer.
|
12-03-2017, 10:20 AM | #147 | |
Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
|
Quote:
I describe it to my cohorts as somewhat equivalent to having a person perched on top of each shock constantly adjusting the rebound and compression of the shock while reading all of the parameters above. This dynamic control also makes going to a progressive wound spring a little better setup in that you will avoid the minor over/under dampening throughout the entire travel range of the spring/shock. As for weight and ride height changes, you will do a static calibration, with yourself seated in the car, of the MRC sensors. This calibration zeros out the sensors so that you get the full range (0 - 1000mA) of dampening and match the tables in the controller more accurately. I know spring manufactures say their springs work with MRC shocks, and practically speaking, they are right. But technically there is some skew of the dampening range do to the very point you brought up. As for a forum, well, here your are!....Actually I found the C7 section of the Corvette forum the best place to go to for reviews, tip and tricks. The C7 guys have embraced this controller, so there is a lot more activity over there. I've even spotted a couple of Gen 6 guys over in the C7 forum discussing the controller. The firmware within the C7 Corvette DSC controller is the same algorithms as for the Camaro, so we benefit from any upgrades that are done for the Corvette. DSC just announced the V3 firmware upgrade for the controller for both the Camaro and the Corvette. These guys aren't the best at publically communicating and tend to spend their time buried in development and upgrading. I've seen an interview with one of them on You Tube and....well, not the best sales job I've seen. They are much better at doing than selling. As you can probably tell, I've become a big fan of this controller. |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|