Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2017, 12:40 PM   #15
Atomic Ed

 
Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by parish8 View Post
2900 and 45psi holding steady.
45 psi !?!?
Atomic Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2017, 12:54 PM   #16
Perdieu
 
Perdieu's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Nightfall Grey Auto 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Blue Springs MO.
Posts: 525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic Ed View Post
45 psi !?!?
high side and low side fuel pump numbers
Perdieu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2017, 02:50 PM   #17
Atomic Ed

 
Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perdieu View Post
high side and low side fuel pump numbers
LOL! Ok, I was thinking, jeez, his power is down because his heads are lifting off the block with that kind of boost!

Need to read more carefully.
Atomic Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2017, 07:34 PM   #18
Tcamaro
 
Drives: 16' 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Frankfort
Posts: 80
NOS and large turbos are very fun! On my grand national I ran a 88mm and very tight converter but would spray 75hp shot and turn it off at about 110kpa. You get the best of both worlds by running a tight converter.
Attached Images
 
Tcamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2017, 07:48 PM   #19
PRAY


 
PRAY's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
Good work, congrats.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
PRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2017, 11:25 AM   #20
ProCharger
 
Drives: Many C7's
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by parish8 View Post
My first trip to the track with the twins suggests some significant power at low boost. Quite a bit more than I was expecting especially when looking at some calculators. http://www.wallaceracing.com/et-hp-mph-8th.php



Stock at ran 89.6 in the 1/8mile, calc shows 447hp

E85 and some exhaust mods at ran 92.3mph, calc shows 489hp

Now add 3psi with closed exhaust, 100.8mph, calc shows 656hp

Now open exhaust which bumped the boost to 5psi, 104.8mph, calc shows 715hp

This is wg spring only and the smallest spring that came with the waste gate. I like to play with the calculators and always have an expectation when I goto the track what it should run. It is quite a bit faster than I anticipated.


Hows my old KTM doing?


The good news is that you really don't have to guess on your HP numbers.
That data log you posted shows pretty much exactly what she is doing....

I would say about 693hp (crank) based on that log. ON THE HIGH SIDE.
Which is very impressive.

E85 is the magic fuel....
ProCharger is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.