|
|
#15 | |
|
FMPG
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 1,888
|
Quote:
__________________
Ordered 3/8/16- NFG/Ceramic White, M6, MRC, NPP, 6 pots, blk blade, no sunroof, blk splitter, blk bow ties, dark tails, nav.
ARH 1 7/8" ceramic coated full sys w/NPP; Maggie 9.2psi (85mm); Jannetty rough idle cam(TSP), tune and LT4 fuel system; Forgeline VX1 Black PVD (20x10,11); R88R 315's; ALPriority; BMR rear arms, bushings, DS loop; RF intake (red); nGauge ![]() 93 octane: 712rwhp, 654rwtq / E85 (E66 mix): 734rwhp, 674rwtq (SuperFlow Dyno) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
|
No Heartbeat here, but daily driving an E-Force, which is basically the same Eaton 2300 guts in the SC.
I'm putting it on the dyno tomorrow to get some honest figures. Edelbrock claims 580 rwhp from the E-Force, but I'll be surprised if it hits that number. (Their graph also shows a stock LT1 at around 440 rwhp......don't think so.) Knowing dyno numbers are just that, numbers, but it will still will be interesting to see real world output. My estimate is around 540 rwhp, given Edelbrock's need to tune conservatively. I'm currently running a Garrett 2871 turbo on my Audi at 24 psi. The Audi has a 9.3 CR and is limited by the turbo, not the CR. These high pressures are on a stock block and heads, with a set of J.E. pistons. Any higher psi on the turbo and the head starts to lift. Tuning is everything with any forced induction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
FMPG
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 1,888
|
Quote:
__________________
Ordered 3/8/16- NFG/Ceramic White, M6, MRC, NPP, 6 pots, blk blade, no sunroof, blk splitter, blk bow ties, dark tails, nav.
ARH 1 7/8" ceramic coated full sys w/NPP; Maggie 9.2psi (85mm); Jannetty rough idle cam(TSP), tune and LT4 fuel system; Forgeline VX1 Black PVD (20x10,11); R88R 315's; ALPriority; BMR rear arms, bushings, DS loop; RF intake (red); nGauge ![]() 93 octane: 712rwhp, 654rwtq / E85 (E66 mix): 734rwhp, 674rwtq (SuperFlow Dyno) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Drives: 2015 Mustang GT PP M6 Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Hope Mills, NC
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
I'm sure once there's more time on the ECU on these cars they'll start to wake up even more.
__________________
'15 GT PP M6 763RWHP @ 8100RPM 3740lbs
3.2LC KB, ID1000, Boundary OPG, TSS CS, KB BAP, SCT X4, Palm Beach Tuned, Kooks 1 7/8 Catted LT's, Magnaflow Comp. Cat-back, Mantic Twin Disc, MGW Short Throw, Maximum Motorsprots CC Plates, BMR Cradle Lockout, Eibach Pro-Kit, Proj. 6GR 19x10 ET35 19x11 ET50 Lumar 35% Tint, UPR Floating Pony, MMD Decklid, BlackVue650GW Dash Cam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2001 Audi TT, 2016 Camaro Join Date: May 2016
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 833
|
Quote:
I do note that your long tubes only added 20 rwhp. Given the price of a full exhaust setup, I don't see this as a "must have" at the moment. Frankly, I like the relatively quite exhaust setup right now and may only do long tubes with the stock exhaust. I think a CAI and a tune will yield the best "bang for the buck" for this setup. I also agree that Edelbrock has to tune conservatively to reduce their exposure to "your SC blew up my engine" lawsuits. So I plan to just drive it and enjoy it for a while to stay in the warranty window. Maybe I'll get it tuned later when I'm satisfied the bugs are worked out and I'm confident that I won't need the warranty. I've learned through the years that someone else will always have something faster/quicker/more powerful than I have. I now just go by what gives me the driving experience I want and leave it at that. As it sets, it's a great all-around package; may not change a thing.
Last edited by Atomic Ed; 06-07-2016 at 05:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|