|
|
#295 | |
![]() Drives: 1981 silver corvette,Hyper Blue 2SS Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 625
|
Quote:
There is a demand for both, so let people have both. |
|
|
|
|
|
#296 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#297 | ||
|
corner barstool sitter
Drives: 08 Mustang GT, 19 WRX Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eastern Time Zone
Posts: 6,990
|
Quote:
Quote:
Norm
__________________
'08 GT coupe 5M (the occasional track toy)
'19 WRX 6M (the family sedan . . . seriously) |
||
|
|
|
|
#298 | |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Quote:
I have an SCCA license, and run SCCA and NASA events. I have been doing track events and around people in the know for over 15 years. I also know multiple Vette owners who have had MRC, and have removed it for high end coilovers and gone quicker, and it allows more adjustability. MRC is great for what it is, and works fantastically on the street, but it is not the best solution for the track. MRC is used a lot now as it can give very good on track performance, and still keep good ride quality. It is not because it is the best bar none. I mean even GMC uses it in their full size trucks...to improve the ride. If you ask ten legit racers who will run their 1LE's on the track, not posers, I would bet 9/10 or 10/10 would not check the MRC option box. It is not saying MRC isn't awesome, it is, just not the best in this case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#299 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Chevy Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 794
|
Quote:
Bam. Truer words can not be spoken. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#300 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,991
|
Quote:
From the testing I've seen, the MRC and hydraulic cars have pulled basically identical skid pad and figure 8 numbers. Either GM's MRC isn't as good as you say or Camaro engineers disagree because the Z/28 did not come with MRC.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#301 |
![]() Drives: 1981 silver corvette,Hyper Blue 2SS Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 625
|
Making a dedicated 100% track focused car, I would agree that MRC probably isn't the way to go (unless air-born mode could take significant advantage of it) but for anything less than 50/50 track / street, the minor hindrances in track performance could be worth it (at least, in my opinion) to have the option for a more pliable ride on mediocre driving surfaces
|
|
|
|
|
#302 | |||
|
Speed Freak
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
|
Quote:
Quote:
I understand the understeer adjustablity comment but like I said in my last comment, the real track rats may opt for something else, I personally feel the magride is so good, if you check that box you can spend your upgrade dollars on power or tires or brakes and be faster. Quote:
Read the comparison between the Z/28 and the GT350R in motortrend. Look at what they say about the suspension on the 2 cars. That is the difference between magride and conventional, and Z/28 has a very good conventional suspension. Magride is the newest technology and Gm has done an outstanding job of continuing to improve their Magride suspensions. If my car trailered to the track or was a garage queen that only came out for trips to the track, then I might skip the mag ride and build a custom system. My SS is my daily driver and I love that there is so much adjustablility with the selection of drive mode.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq
2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date. ![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#303 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,578
|
The 1LE will be something unique....
If the suspension can be tuned so that MRC and regular 1L-E "shocks" would be the same set-up, then you may see the MRC as an option...but I don't think that will be the case... The SS suspension with an MRC option is already available, if that is your track preference. I don't see why they would duplicate it again on a 1LE... |
|
|
|
|
#304 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,991
|
What comparisons have run a 6th gen SS around a track and given a lap time? I haven't seen one.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#305 | |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Quote:
FYI, the ZL1 got MRC to help handle it's huge heft and weight gain, if you look the Z28 (more track oriented, and quicker track car), it didn't get MRC, and in that price point it certainly could have. Just some food for thought... Not knocking MRC, it is an awesome system, but many on here don't fully understand it. Where? By whom? I have yet to see one, as far as I know they do not exist from a reputable source yet... Not true, Motor Trends test car did not have MRC, and so far that car got the best skidpad and figure eight numbers... |
|
|
|
|
|
#306 |
|
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
#307 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Considering the Z51 setup on the C7 has optional MRC, I would say they could. I'm positive we will not see MRC standard on the 1LE and like the C7 it will be an option for those who want to drive it on the street. It will also solve the only real compliant against the 5th gen 1LE, ride quality.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
|
#308 | |
|
Speed Freak
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
|
Quote:
The Motor Trend Camaro vs Mustang is the only non magride article and indeed they got a better skid pad number. I must admit that this surprises me... hard to say if this is in fact better than a magride car would have done in the same conditions but food for thought anyway. I still think that most occasional lappers would do better with magride... and on the public roads it is no contest.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq
2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed Thread
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|