[GM-ACE]

Originally Posted by grkjet

Wasn't expecting a radical change from the 5th gen so the evolutionary design is not disappointing for me. I think my opinion of the the car will hinge on how the rear of the car, specifically the tail lights, and the interior looks. IMO the interior for the 6th gen has to be revolutionary rather than evolutionary. The 5th gen was mean and just stunning, but the interior left a lot to be desired.

100% agree.

[GM-ACE]

Originally Posted by HuJass

So, from what I've seen of the camo'ed cars, the tease pics, and the renderings, I too feel that GM could have pressed a little more on the design. But they could have done that while keeping the design elements of the Camaro that make the Camaro what it is.

I look at some of these concepts done by non-GM people and wonder why they didn't go more in these directions:



This one has a great profile, very aggressive, sharp crisp lines, muscular, and is still recognizable as a Camaro (the front & rear of this one were not good)


Y


This one was VERY promising. Obviously it had to be toned down a bit. But it still looks like a Camaro.





This one is neat. Hadn't seen it before.





This one is freah & edgy, yet still looks like a Camaro






This one is really good. Has a lot of promise.





The one in the foreground has promise.




Do any of these concepts appeal to you?

Yes! Thank you. All of them in some way say Camaro in their looks, but in their own way. They don't look like the designer started with a 5th gen. The lone exception being that design by George Loizou.

[DenverTaco07]

I really like the edging behind and the 1/4 window, and below the whole set of side windows. This is a great design feature - I'm sure we will see more of these great lines that were hidden by camo, this car is going to be really nice looking. Anyone here who is disappointed by the lack of a radical change - well, my guess is you'll come around.

[HuJass]

See, I think those all carry something over from the 5th gen.

To me, these are just exaggerated, more aggressive 5th gens.

[DenverTaco07]

Originally Posted by HuJass

See, I think those all carry something over from the 5th gen.

To me, these are just exaggerated, more aggressive 5th gens.

I think the carry over happens to just about 99.9999% of all vehicles...would you agree? Rarely do we see a next generation that when placed next to previous, we wouldn't see the similarities.

ok...so the REAL QUESTION IS - WILL THERE BE GILLS?

[Millertime555]

Official article:

http://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/...ro-teaser.html

[IOMike]

GM has been doing a great job with the fronts of vehicles lately. It's the rear that I'm worried about.

[Bhobbs]

Brightened image from GMI.

[87GNX]

Originally Posted by ChefBorOzzy

Idk about "great" the last 20 years.. 2005-2009 Mustang is absolutely hideous. Previous gen Fusion wasn't a bad design. Taurus is decent, but quite fat and lacks interior for how big it is in the outside. New Fusion is a hit and miss depending on trim, I actually prefer the Accord across the board.

Now, I think they've done a great job with the Flex (looks so cool) and the new Explorer. F150 doesn't do anything for me.

20 years is a definite I stretch I would say.. Not like Chevy had great looking cars 15 years ago either though.

I'd really have to look at each model and see what I think about it again, buy can't really think of many that were great designs.

This is the best looking Ford imo...sexy midsized suv. Ford Edge Sport....badass interior too.

[87GNX]

Originally Posted by HuJass

See, I think those all carry something over from the 5th gen.

To me, these are just exaggerated, more aggressive 5th gens.

It looks like a sleeker 2015, nothing revolutionary at all.

[ChefBorOzzy]

Originally Posted by 87GNX

This is the best looking Ford imo...sexy midsized suv. Ford Edge Sport....badass interior too.

I agree. Edge is very nice.

[DenverTaco07]

Originally Posted by 87GNX

It looks like a sleeker 2015, nothing revolutionary at all.

And for two years GM has stated "Evolutionary". Are folks expecting them to provide revolutionary after they stated evolutionary?

IMO, most buyers will see the car for the car that it is; they simply won't make any comparison to the previous gen and say "golly gee, it just isn't radical enough of a departure for me...i'm getting a Challenger (cuz it looks exactly like the original).

anyway, it's going to kick a$$ so why care what it looks like compared to any other car.

[Bhobbs]

Someone on GMI brightened the teaser.

[DenverTaco07]

Originally Posted by Bhobbs

your pic ain't comin thru...at least for me. If i think it is what i think it is, i think you have to be logged into GMinsidenews for this to show up. Maybe you can download it to your local computer, then upload from there? I'm just throwin that out there.