[KILLA BEE]

I dont all professional mumbo jumbo lol but here ks my dyno chart from yesterday.
First Line/base
Second Line/ on 93 pump
Third Line/ on E70, the E from sheets gas starion completey blows Haha

I have to give "most" of the midrange credit due to the MSD! But, all of the torque credit to the V2!!!!!!!!.
My mods are
Borla Atak AXLEBACK
2in Kooks Lts catless with 3in off road connection pipe
Rotofab
Airforce msd
Ported mamo v2 TB
E85 Flex fuel sensor

[s346k]

you can thank ethanol for the tq. my car picked up 31 ft lb on ethanol with a stock tb. it also gained less than 1 hp/tq with a ported tb, we swapped them with the car on the dyno and compared both.

[DorkMissile]

If you only picked up 18hp from 93 to E70, you need to go get your money back from your tuner

[KILLA BEE]

Originally Posted by DorkMissile

If you only picked up 18hp from 93 to E70, you need to go get your money back from your tuner

The E was complete crap. Hopefully it will adjust when I put in actual E 85. I will Never get E from sheetz gas station again which is labeled "94 octane" and E content 50-81percent.

[KILLA BEE]

Originally Posted by s346k

you can thank ethanol for the tq. my car picked up 31 ft lb on ethanol with a stock tb. it also gained less than 1 hp/tq with a ported tb, we swapped them with the car on the dyno and compared both.

and no i cant, that might be the case from YOUR tb not mine. The Torque is stil high 461 on pump b4 the E

[BruceWayne1LE]

I’m assuming the Baseline was dead stock? 377 is pretty low and yes I get that the dyno is a tool and not absolute.

[BruceWayne1LE]

Also I’d your MSD Ported? I don’t see any loss at the bottom. Looks good

[KILLA BEE]

Originally Posted by BruceWayne1LE

Also I’d your MSD Ported? I don’t see any loss at the bottom. Looks good

Nope I didnt even port it. I know alot of people do. I just personally couldn't spend 600 for 10-12 hp. All i did was put a heatshield under it lol. Only ported is the V2

[KILLA BEE]

Originally Posted by BruceWayne1LE

I’m assuming the Baseline was dead stock? 377 is pretty low and yes I get that the dyno is a tool and not absolute.

yes it was very low. I was thinking 380 390. The autos with that 20% drivetrain kills me

[NA18CamaroSS]

Question: Most of the sixth gen Camaro dynos that I have seen, torque and HP are pretty close. On my car the torque is slightly higher than the HP. On other cars the reverse is true, but the numbers are usually close. On your car you are getting 20 more ft-lbs of torque than HP. Why is that -if you know?

[KILLA BEE]

[QUOTE=B19 Coupe;10775816]Question: Most of the sixth gen Camaro dynos that I have seen, torque and HP are pretty close. On my car the torque is slightly higher than the HP. On other cars the reverse is true, but the numbers are usually close. On your car you are getting 20 more ft-lbs of torque than HP. Why is that -if you know?[/QUOTE

Yup....the Tony Mamo PTB!!°° he is the man im telling you. Check the corvette forums and its not just from the E85 it was high as heck on pump gas also.

[wnta1ss]

What size is the V2 Mamo TB, is it 87mm or 95mm?

That 24% gain in hp seems fairly decent. I will mention that your peak hp rpm seems low for an MSD, as they usually keep pulling higher than that from other charts that I've seen.

[s346k]

[QUOTE=KILLA BEE;10775887]

Originally Posted by B19 Coupe

Question: Most of the sixth gen Camaro dynos that I have seen, torque and HP are pretty close. On my car the torque is slightly higher than the HP. On other cars the reverse is true, but the numbers are usually close. On your car you are getting 20 more ft-lbs of torque than HP. Why is that -if you know?[/QUOTE

Yup....the Tony Mamo PTB!!°° he is the man im telling you. Check the corvette forums and its not just from the E85 it was high as heck on pump gas also.

for comparison, the tq on my car was 7 higher than hp. hard to compare dynos, though and i don’t have near as many mods.

lets see a time slip...if we even get that luxury this year.

[oldman]

no such thing as STD HP anyway.