Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


KPM Fuel Systems


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-30-2018, 06:53 AM   #1
Bluecyclone
 
Bluecyclone's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Cyclone mustang
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Port Lavaca,Tx.
Posts: 355
BMR cradle lockouts reviews

I'd like to hear from your own experience how these have helped your Camaro? My Mustang has them & I believe they stiffen the chassis well.
Attached Images
 
__________________
2014 Cyclone/Select Shift/"/Sold
2016 ruby red GT w/3.55:1/resonator delete X- pipe/UPR catch can/Airaid "tube"W/AEM/J&M/BigWorm/BMR /SVE /ZL1addons/Redline/Steeda/BG fluids/
Bluecyclone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 03:05 PM   #2
Ventmaster


 
Ventmaster's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 1SS 6spd
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,041
Much better controlled back end and zero impact on NVH- in fact I kinda forgot I had put it on until one early morning drive (still dark out) and I took a tight left, uphill, slightly off camber turn and noticed the traction control nannies flashed for a moment.

Then realized why... doing 98 in a corner marked for 40 MPH.
Ventmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2018, 03:12 PM   #3
TRZ06

 
TRZ06's Avatar
 
Drives: 22' Porsche PDK GT4
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,027
Locking down the rear-end is the best thing you can do for these 6th gen Camaros.

It is a stellar chassis, it is the only weakness to them. It's too bad GM didn't do this across the entire line, not just the ZL1 1LE.
__________________
Current:
22' Porsche PDK GT4 (MCS 2-way remote dampers)

Previous:
18' NFG 2SS 1LE (ZL1 1LE solid rear cradle bushings & Corsa Exhaust)
16' F80 M3 (Ohlin R/T Coilovers)
13' Audi TTRS (APR Stage 1, MSS Springs)
09' C6 Z06
08' E90 M3
06' 335i (KW V2 Coilovers)
03' C5 Z06
TRZ06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2018, 05:18 PM   #4
crankaholic

 
crankaholic's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 771
What TRZ06 said... GM had to save money somewhere I guess. Installing rear subframe lockouts and braces made a huge difference for me. I upgraded to poly bushings on a few previous cars and always had a noticeable NVH impact... the lockout didn't have any of those side effects. I definitely recommend it.

Although I have to say if you're planning on upgrading your rear control arms as well, I would go with the poly bushing models for the trailing arms... for a street car. I had a full set of spherical joint control arms at the rear, and that added some harshness... I swapped the trailing arms for ones with poly bushings and the car rides better now. I still have the fully-adjustable spherical joint upper control arms and toe rods, with stock lower control arms. The rear end is extremely planted - the car just squats a bit and goes without any of the extra movement I had with the stock setup.
__________________
crankaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.