|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
PRAY Performance Cam gains 75/23rw. 562/500rw.
Got back on my normal dyno today. I was running into some TM things and it limited me a little bit. I need to work my TQ Coefficients again. I also didn't have time to start moving my injector timing back towards stock to see if that helped anything. It is retarded right now. I know there was more in there cause it put down 547/478rw in 5th. I ALWAYS get a 23-25rw bump from 5th to 6th. Didn't see that this time. Total gains 189/111rw so far. Still SBE.
Graph one is stock vs. bolt on/Heads vs. H/C now. Graph two is just heads vs. H/C. And H/C alone.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
SABIO
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
|
ImpressiveCam doesn't kick in until 5000rpm. Why is that?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
It's up 12-15rw from 3,500to 4,200. Then it takes back off at 4,700. So there is a gain there even though it is ever so slight. I didn't get the compression I wanted out of this thing. That is definitely hurting down low. It could also be that I am exceeding my tq tables greatly down low and only slightly up top. I also designed this cam with going 9's as the single goal. I did think I would see a solid 20rwtq bump across the board but I just didn't get it. I wouldn't change anything though.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS A8 Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Euphrasia
Posts: 88
|
Great news! Impressive as always man. Wish you were closer so I could get in on some of these gains lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Drives: 17 Hyper Blue SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 423 Tennessee
Posts: 89
|
What's SBE stand for?
Glad you're close to me if I decide to Ultimately do a all motor road race setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,559
|
Nice results!!
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Thanks guys.
Looking at the graphs some more I have come to the conclusion that the bump where the tq curves meet is due to the whole curve is shifted right about 750rpm which makes perfect sense.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
very impressive, cant wait to see what it runs. I look at the et and mph some of you na guys are running and am just blown away.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
I am thinking it will go 9.9 maxed out. 107 in the 1/8 and 135 in the 1/4. Time to work on the car now. I don't think I am going to get much more put of the motor. I wish I would have done a better job with the fly cutting. There is still more porting to be done in the IM and heads as well. I am also reworking my PCV system. I would really like to squeeze another 10rw out of this thing.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Drives: 2000 pontiac formula Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: palm beach gardens
Posts: 105
|
Those are some impressive numbers. If you trap 135 that would be crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
I am sure it will take a 26" tire and some weight reduction and negative DA but all three of those things are easily done. Winter is rapidly approaching so the weather should start looking good. HPT also just released a bunch of converter tables we have been missing. There should be some more mph in there once I figure Thise out. But I am more than willing to sacrifice mph for ET up front. The next couple months are going to be very interesting.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Drives: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 32
|
Pretty impressive
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 SS 1LE Mosiac Black Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,132
|
I really cannot imagine any H/C package yielding a larger net gain than your package did. Brett, although I am not sure you ever tested this, in all the testing you have done or heard about, do you have any idea how much a catted car loses vs non-catted (e.g. 10-12 hp)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|