|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1970-1/2 Z-28, 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sanford, Fl
Posts: 973
|
Possible motor for Z/28??
http://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/enthu...KWN?li=BBnbfcL
In the article they write, "A notable power upgrade to the C8 will occur in January 2019, attributable to a new four-cam, 32-valve V-8 set to be presented at NAIAS." Could a toned down version of the motor make it into the Z/28 before the higher horse version gets into the ZORA? Just a thought. Also in the article, "The C7's final hurrah will occur at next year’s 2017 NAIAS, when a swan-song mega-power edition debuts, possibly wearing the illustrious ZR1 badge." Now I expect that this one might be FI but another possible option for the Z. Anyway, it looks like GM has some power plants that they have been working on which could debut in less powerful form in the Z/28....if you still believe that the Vette must have the best first, which I don't think is the way things work anymore (see A10). |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
I just can't see GM putting an all new engine in the 6th gen z/28. Would I like to see some flashy new powerplant? Absolutely! Who wouldn't? It just doesn't make sense though.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Drives: Four wheels and an engine Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Garage
Posts: 363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1970-1/2 Z-28, 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sanford, Fl
Posts: 973
|
it would be a great test platform to debut the engine before you throw it into your shiny new flagship vette. I get what you are saying though. Just thought it interesting there may be two motors out there that GM has been quite about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
No way man. The Vette guys would be like "seriously you put a leftover camaro motor in my new 100K vette?"
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 1LE Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
|
People keep saying it doesn't make sense. I don't understand why not. Remember, the 4th and 5th gen cars were from a broke GM just trying to keep the doors open. R&D money was minimal and the Camaro team had to fight for every penny. Fast forward 10 years (yes it has been that long since most of the 5th gen tech was developed) and GM is far more stable financially. The Camaro is no longer a financial burden and is seen as a big money maker. It only makes sense to continue to pour money into it to keep the momentum. This strategy is evident in the number of performance releases in the last couple of years of the 5th gen. With the 6th gen already on the drawing board they released an over the top Z/28. That is not the mark of a model they are trying to keep on a small budget. GM knows the Camaro is worth spending money on and they realize you have to spend money to make money. I don't know if it will get a special engine or a new engine before the Vette. But it is entirely possible that with well over a year before production, they could have a new engine available and share it with a new model.
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.
Delivered 21 Jan 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1970-1/2 Z-28, 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sanford, Fl
Posts: 973
|
In the new world order of GM, the Vette does not tell Camaro what it can and cannot do. They Program Groups for each car are completely independent and if the motor division creates a motor that the Camaro team thinks works well in their car and they can make a profit on.....the Vette team has nothing they can do about it. Don't forget, the vette is getting the leftover Camaro 10 speed transmission next year. When GM was reorg'd coming out of bankruptcy, the hierarchial decision making where Vette or Caddy had to get everything new first was flushed out with all the other bad ideas that drove GM in default. The rate of innovation in the industry does not allow for a single model of car to "own" a technology and have proprietary access. If an engine is developed that gives Camaro an advantage over the competition and that motor is ready to go, waiting 2-3 years for it to get in the Vette first just does not work in today's marketplace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2013
Location: San Diego, CA.
Posts: 457
|
When was the last time a high performance V8 went into to a Camaro that was not in the Corvette first?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1970-1/2 Z-28, 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sanford, Fl
Posts: 973
|
We can do this all day man...the LT1 and LT4 went into the Vette because production cycles lined up. There would be no difference if the Camaro was in the same spot and there was a motor that was ready for production. Like I said, the A10 is going into the Camaro FIRST because production cycles lined up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
Yeah, because all the engine cycles just happen to line up with the Corvette cycles.
There is a reason the line up, and that's because they plan them to. It's not a coincidence.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
KaBoom1701
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 8,631
|
There's always a bigger fish in the sea somewhere guys.....lol
__________________
Mods:
Roto-Fab Intake, WW Res. kit & Big Gulp Air Scoop, Elite Catch Can, ATI Super Damper & 18% OD Pulley, LF Idler pulley bracket, Metco CC breather, ID850 Injectors, Stainless Power Headers w/ ceramic coating, TR71X Spark Plugs, JMS Fuel Pump Booster, Bo White TB, Tuned by Ted @ Jannetty Racing, Ron Davis HX, D3 Reservoir, Pfadt 1" Springs, Moreno Camber Plates, ZL1 Addons Splitter guard washers, Tow Hook kit & rock guards, Hurst Shifter Billet Plus 6 Speed Short Shifter, ZL1 DRL lighting harness, ZL1 Recaro Seats. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Drives: KIA Forte GT2 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: everywhere and no where
Posts: 318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1970-1/2 Z-28, 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sanford, Fl
Posts: 973
|
Lol. That's all you guys got?? Can't happen because it has not been in the Vette yet? Really?? Let's pretend the Camaro can get something really cool first for once. Hold on, we don't have to pretend....it got the most innovative transmission ever released by a domestic car manufacturer in the A10 so your argument is only valid looking backwards as GM has proven that the Camaro is worthy of debuting technology as much as the Vette, don't forget the suspension on the Gen5 Z/28 which never made it to the Vette yet is far superior to anything the Vette currently offers. You guys sound like the old guys down at the barbershop saying, "back in my day...". Lol. Well, I for one think that the only thing separating the Vette and the Camaro in the eyes of GM now that they have pushed the performance of the Camaro this far is the backseat. No more little brother. Anyway, the more I talk to guys who work closely with GM on the Continental racing circuit, the more I get the feeling that Team Camaro has a real surprise for all of us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|