Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V8 LT1 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


KPM Fuel Systems


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-18-2023, 07:55 PM   #1
Dmoney2SS
 
Drives: 2022 summit white Chevy Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Port St. Lucie, florida
Posts: 119
LT5 (95mm) throttle body port or no

Is it worth porting an LT5 throttle body or could I get away with an unported 95mm? I’m planning on just doing a simple bolt on build for now, that being lt2 manifold 95mm tb and possibly a rotofab, also would I need a spacer for it or would it bolt right up?

Last edited by Dmoney2SS; 07-18-2023 at 10:38 PM.
Dmoney2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2023, 08:26 PM   #2
6spdhyperblue


 
Drives: 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,786
I run unported lt5. I tried a few different ported lt5s.
__________________
6spdhyperblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2023, 10:37 PM   #3
Dmoney2SS
 
Drives: 2022 summit white Chevy Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Port St. Lucie, florida
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6spdhyperblue View Post
I run unported lt5. I tried a few different ported lt5s.
Was there any difference?
Dmoney2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2023, 07:37 AM   #4
Joshinator99
Moderator
 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 6,198
Run the unported 95. Ported versions can be a nightmare to tune and aren’t worth the aggravation. If you need more airflow than a 95 then simply buy a 103.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2023, 07:31 PM   #5
Dmoney2SS
 
Drives: 2022 summit white Chevy Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Port St. Lucie, florida
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
Run the unported 95. Ported versions can be a nightmare to tune and aren’t worth the aggravation. If you need more airflow than a 95 then simply buy a 103.
Do you know if I need a spacer to run it? With an LT2 IM
Dmoney2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2023, 07:52 PM   #6
Fstlane
 
Drives: 2019 Summit White ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: ZL1 Nirvana
Posts: 103
189 bucks on Rock Auto....genuine GM part
Fstlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2023, 08:10 PM   #7
6spdhyperblue


 
Drives: 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,786
U need a spacer unless you widen the holes on the throttle body and then port the throat of the intake and cut beyond the o-ring
__________________
6spdhyperblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2023, 09:27 PM   #8
Fstlane
 
Drives: 2019 Summit White ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: ZL1 Nirvana
Posts: 103
Ok to try to provide some clarification. I have a stock LT5 throttle body from Rock Auto it is a GM Stock part on a ZL1. I used an adapter plate from
https://www.solerengineering.com/generalmotors.

Car runs great....still in the process of tuning and I have not had the car on a dyno yet as I am still adding a few things.

Listen to Josh....he knows what he is talking about.
Fstlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2023, 09:45 PM   #9
Joshinator99
Moderator
 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 6,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fstlane View Post
Ok to try to provide some clarification. I have a stock LT5 throttle body from Rock Auto it is a GM Stock part on a ZL1. I used an adapter plate from
https://www.solerengineering.com/generalmotors.

Car runs great....still in the process of tuning and I have not had the car on a dyno yet as I am still adding a few things.

Listen to Josh....he knows what he is talking about.
Thanks Fstlane.

I think that adapter actually looks pretty good…less restrictive than others I’ve seen.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2023, 12:37 AM   #10
Daily1LE
 
Daily1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: IL
Posts: 122
Just curious, is there any benefit at all with a 95MM LT5 TB mated to a LT1/2 IM? Both have to be choked back down to 87mm so I wonder what is the point of the 95MM TB?

I just picked up a LT2 IM manifold myself and am in this similar debate on if I run my stock TB or a LT5, but failing to find any reason to run the LT5 on a stock LT2 IM.
__________________
2018 1SS 1LE - DSX E85 Kit | Full ARH Exhaust | RotoFab CAI | Katech Cam | Katech Ported Stock Heads | Tuned - 530HP/456TQ
Daily1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2023, 07:15 AM   #11
6spdhyperblue


 
Drives: 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,786
If the lt2 is ported, the throat should be larger than 87mm
__________________

Last edited by 6spdhyperblue; 07-24-2023 at 12:42 PM.
6spdhyperblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2023, 08:43 AM   #12
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,789
I can attest to ported LT5s can be over-ported pretty easily and the resulting tuning necessary to get it to behave can be not fun...
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2023, 10:10 AM   #13
EliteLT1
 
EliteLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Camaro LT1
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 33
mm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daily1LE View Post
Just curious, is there any benefit at all with a 95MM LT5 TB mated to a LT1/2 IM? Both have to be choked back down to 87mm so I wonder what is the point of the 95MM TB?

I just picked up a LT2 IM manifold myself and am in this similar debate on if I run my stock TB or a LT5, but failing to find any reason to run the LT5 on a stock LT2 IM.
I'm running the LT2 IM unported, with the 95mm throttle body, also unported.

My logic (shoutout to EssMotorsports on youtube) is that for any throttle position besides WOT, the larger throttle body will allow more air to flow. For example, you will get more airflow with a 95mm TB at 50% throttle than you would get with an 87mm TB at 50% throttle. Probably more of a throttle response benefit in this case

At WOT, the 87mm TB still has the plate and shaft blocking part of the opening (effectively reducing airflow below a true 87mm opening), while the IM opening is always the full 87mm diameter circle. In this case the TB is the limiting factor for airflow. Going to a 95mm would make the IM opening the limiting factor

Unless I'm misunderstanding how they measure the TB, this makes sense to me. But I don't have any comparison numbers isolating only the TB differences
EliteLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2024, 10:06 PM   #14
wang970305
 
Drives: 2021 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: HTX
Posts: 523
Quote:
Originally Posted by EliteLT1 View Post
mm

I'm running the LT2 IM unported, with the 95mm throttle body, also unported.

My logic (shoutout to EssMotorsports on youtube) is that for any throttle position besides WOT, the larger throttle body will allow more air to flow. For example, you will get more airflow with a 95mm TB at 50% throttle than you would get with an 87mm TB at 50% throttle. Probably more of a throttle response benefit in this case

At WOT, the 87mm TB still has the plate and shaft blocking part of the opening (effectively reducing airflow below a true 87mm opening), while the IM opening is always the full 87mm diameter circle. In this case the TB is the limiting factor for airflow. Going to a 95mm would make the IM opening the limiting factor

Unless I'm misunderstanding how they measure the TB, this makes sense to me. But I don't have any comparison numbers isolating only the TB differences
Im confused... the IM opening is choked back down to 87mm, how come the 95mm TB would work better than the stock 87mm tb
__________________
2021 Camaro 2SS Summit White
Kooks 1-7/8'' LTH with high flow cats, Corsa Catback Exhaust, Roto-Fab CAI, Ported LT2 IM, LT5 95mm TB, Lethal Garage Flex Fuel Sensor, Mishimoto catch can, AEM Wideband.
wang970305 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.